In Session Message Boards  

Go Back   In Session Message Boards > Michelle Young

 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-21-2009, 02:01 AM
awareness awareness is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: All Posts Are JMO/IMO
Posts: 1,218
Michelle Fisher Young case 2/21 thru 2/25

Does the GJ convene again soon?
  #2  
Old 02-21-2009, 09:01 AM
5swab5 5swab5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chapel Hill, N.C.
Posts: 3,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by awareness View Post
Does the GJ convene again soon?

Thank You for the new thread.

Goodness Gracious, the MY board is kinda like Three-card Monte. Now you see it...now you don't.

Not sure about the GJ, but if recent rumors are correct about LE visiting Brevard, sounds like they are keeping the pressure on. MOO
__________________
"Silence is Golden." At what Price?
  #3  
Old 02-21-2009, 12:30 PM
Lindsey Lindsey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Middle Georgia
Posts: 2,108
Quote:
Originally Posted by awareness View Post
Does the GJ convene again soon?
I believe the GJ will meet this coming Tuesday, Feb 24.
  #4  
Old 02-21-2009, 03:33 PM
Stellagant Stellagant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,312
Quote:
Originally Posted by onederwomyn View Post
The first time I read the CNN one it did say there was an arrest warrant. Now they have changed it to read "pursuing an arrest warrant." Strange. At any rate, it looks like they are pretty sure they know who did it.

And they cleared Gary Condit pretty early in the investigation. He should not have been having an affair, but in a way I felt bad for him because it wrecked his career...even though he had nothing to do with her death.
Who is "they"????

I'd like to see a link to support your claim he was ever cleared. He is yet another example that proves an affair does not equal guilty of murder.
  #5  
Old 02-21-2009, 04:00 PM
awareness awareness is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: All Posts Are JMO/IMO
Posts: 1,218
JMO that there's more CE that ties Jason to Michelle's murder than there's evidence that Gary Condit killed Chandra. Awesome about the Levy case though, good for her parents, friends & loved ones.
  #6  
Old 02-21-2009, 04:43 PM
awareness awareness is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: All Posts Are JMO/IMO
Posts: 1,218
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lindsey View Post
I believe the GJ will meet this coming Tuesday, Feb 24.
Thanks. I feel pretty good the case will be presented within this year at some point - maybe not now although Id like that, but perhaps when the transition period for Cassidy is over & Meredith has primary physical custody.

JMO/IMO
  #7  
Old 02-21-2009, 04:48 PM
penguin01
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by onederwomyn View Post
The first time I read the CNN one it did say there was an arrest warrant. Now they have changed it to read "pursuing an arrest warrant." Strange. At any rate, it looks like they are pretty sure they know who did it.

And they cleared Gary Condit pretty early in the investigation. He should not have been having an affair, but in a way I felt bad for him because it wrecked his career...even though he had nothing to do with her death.
Unfortunately they did not clear him. So perhaps now he will finally be cleared.
  #8  
Old 02-21-2009, 07:48 PM
Cardinal Cardinal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,237
Quote:
Originally Posted by penguin01 View Post
Unfortunately they did not clear him. So perhaps now he will finally be cleared.
Having the truth come out will hopefully provide closure for both the Levy and Condit families. IIRC, Condit cooperated with authorities in the investigation of Chandra's murder. That caused me to doubt he was involved.

I think if Jason Young had done the same, public opinion would be more inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt.

And yes, I know he has the right to remain silent. I'm only talking about the impact of that choice on public opinion.
__________________
The truth is rarely pure and never simple.
- Oscar Wilde
  #9  
Old 02-21-2009, 08:15 PM
Stellagant Stellagant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,312
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cardinal View Post
Having the truth come out will hopefully provide closure for both the Levy and Condit families. IIRC, Condit cooperated with authorities in the investigation of Chandra's murder. That caused me to doubt he was involved.

I think if Jason Young had done the same, public opinion would be more inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt.

And yes, I know he has the right to remain silent. I'm only talking about the impact of that choice on public opinion.
You're kidding, right? Because in reality, the media fueled public opinion Condit was lying and the guy lost his job.
  #10  
Old 02-21-2009, 08:25 PM
alterEgo© alterEgo© is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: laughing out loud
Posts: 770
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cardinal View Post
Having the truth come out will hopefully provide closure for both the Levy and Condit families. IIRC, Condit cooperated with authorities in the investigation of Chandra's murder. That caused me to doubt he was involved.

I think if Jason Young had done the same, public opinion would be more inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt.

And yes, I know he has the right to remain silent. I'm only talking about the impact of that choice on public opinion.
Yeah, that whole cooperating with LE did Scott Peterson a whole world of good in the court of public opinion. I'm sure it would have done the same for Jason Young.
  #11  
Old 02-21-2009, 08:29 PM
Cardinal Cardinal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,237
Condit had an affair with an intern and initially lied about it. That, as much as anything, cost him his job. Apparently his constituents have morals.

Scott Peterson was found guilty - are you drawing comparisons, AE?
__________________
The truth is rarely pure and never simple.
- Oscar Wilde
  #12  
Old 02-21-2009, 08:35 PM
alterEgo© alterEgo© is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: laughing out loud
Posts: 770
No Card, I'm saying that cooperating with LE doesn't generate sympathy in the court of public opinion and cited the Peterson West case as an example.
  #13  
Old 02-21-2009, 08:37 PM
Lindsey Lindsey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Middle Georgia
Posts: 2,108
And now back to Michelle Young case ....

I wonder if Meredith has moved either of her two housemates out yet so that she can have a pretty little room ready for Cassidy on Wednesday. Or if Linda is flying down from NY, they might just have to stay at a hotel if both housemates aren't moved out yet. IIRC, it's only 3 bedrooms in the house.
  #14  
Old 02-21-2009, 08:37 PM
Stellagant Stellagant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,312
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cardinal View Post
Condit had an affair with an intern and initially lied about it. That, as much as anything, cost him his job. Apparently his constituents have morals.

Scott Peterson was found guilty - are you drawing comparisons, AE?
Condit did not lie to the public. That's the myth that cost him his job and he turned around and sued for libel and settled out of court.

AE's point is that Scott Peterson cooperated and was found guilty in the court of public opinion before he was found guilty at trial.
  #15  
Old 02-21-2009, 08:39 PM
Stellagant Stellagant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,312
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lindsey View Post
And now back to Michelle Young case ....

I wonder if Meredith has moved either of her two housemates out yet so that she can have a pretty little room ready for Cassidy on Wednesday. Or if Linda is flying down from NY, they might just have to stay at a hotel if both housemates aren't moved out yet. IIRC, it's only 3 bedrooms in the house.
iirc, the custody agreement requires the housemates to be vacated prior to CY's arrival.
  #16  
Old 02-21-2009, 08:41 PM
Stellagant Stellagant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,312
Quote:
Originally Posted by alterEgo© View Post
No Card, I'm saying that cooperating with LE doesn't generate sympathy in the court of public opinion and cited the Peterson West case as an example.
an excellent example, imo.
  #17  
Old 02-21-2009, 08:41 PM
Cardinal Cardinal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,237
Quote:
Originally Posted by alterEgo© View Post
No Card, I'm saying that cooperating with LE doesn't generate sympathy in the court of public opinion and cited the Peterson West case as an example.
I disagree, AE. When I first heard about Michelle's murder on the local news, it was reported that Jason was "out of town when the murder occurred." I accepted that, initially, and didn't consider him a suspect.

When that was later clarified, I still didn't automatically consider him a suspect. It wasn't until I heard reports that he refused to speak with LE that I got suspicious. For me, only, if I had heard instead that he was cooperating with LE, as did Jenna Nielsen's husband, I would have been more inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt.

That's all I'm saying.
__________________
The truth is rarely pure and never simple.
- Oscar Wilde
  #18  
Old 02-21-2009, 08:44 PM
Cardinal Cardinal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,237
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lindsey View Post
And now back to Michelle Young case ....

I wonder if Meredith has moved either of her two housemates out yet so that she can have a pretty little room ready for Cassidy on Wednesday. Or if Linda is flying down from NY, they might just have to stay at a hotel if both housemates aren't moved out yet. IIRC, it's only 3 bedrooms in the house.
I'm sure she has, Lindsey. And if not, I'm sure she has arranged for the housemates (are there 2 - how do you know?) to stay elsewhere for the weekend. It isn't necessary that they be "moved out" - only that they not be present overnight during Cassidy's visit, as I understand it.

And I wouldn't at all be surprised if Linda is coming down for the weekend. Wouldn't you, if you had a granddaughter you couldn't wait to see?
__________________
The truth is rarely pure and never simple.
- Oscar Wilde

Last edited by Cardinal; 02-21-2009 at 08:49 PM.
  #19  
Old 02-21-2009, 08:56 PM
Stellagant Stellagant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,312
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cardinal View Post
I disagree, AE. When I first heard about Michelle's murder on the local news, it was reported that Jason was "out of town when the murder occurred." I accepted that, initially, and didn't consider him a suspect.

When that was later clarified, I still didn't automatically consider him a suspect. It wasn't until I heard reports that he refused to speak with LE that I got suspicious. For me, only, if I had heard instead that he was cooperating with LE, as did Jenna Nielsen's husband, I would have been more inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt.

That's all I'm saying.
Raven Abaroa cooperated with LE and public opinion is that he was responsible.
  #20  
Old 02-21-2009, 08:56 PM
Lindsey Lindsey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Middle Georgia
Posts: 2,108
Item 7 on page 5

LINK

Of course I would go for a visit while Cassidy is there. Why the argumentive tone?

I was mostly trying to get back on topic to keep us out of trouble.
  #21  
Old 02-21-2009, 09:06 PM
Jester Jester is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,649
Another example to show that Condit was not a suspect, and that this case is entirely different from the murder of Michelle Young. The only similarity is that both cases are taking time to solve.

"I wouldn't think you would because, clearly, the Washington, D.C., police have made it clear consistently from the beginning that Gary Condit was not even a suspect with regard to the investigation into Chandra Levy's life."

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,147930,00.html
Tuesday, February 15, 2005
  #22  
Old 02-21-2009, 09:07 PM
Cardinal Cardinal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,237
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lindsey View Post
Item 7 on page 5

LINK

Of course I would go for a visit while Cassidy is there. Why the argumentive tone?

I was mostly trying to get back on topic to keep us out of trouble.
You obviously misunderstood the "tone" of my post, Lindsey. I was simply clarifying the terms of the custody agreement and expressing my belief that Linda would be looking forward to seeing Cassidy. IIRC, it has been some months since the three (Linda, Meredith and Cassidy) were together.
__________________
The truth is rarely pure and never simple.
- Oscar Wilde
  #23  
Old 02-21-2009, 09:22 PM
Lindsey Lindsey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Middle Georgia
Posts: 2,108
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cardinal View Post
< snip > It isn't necessary that they be "moved out" - only that they not be present overnight during Cassidy's visit, as I understand it.

< snip>
After rereading the custody agreement, I think you're right. They have until August 1st to move out but they can't be there while Cassidy is there? But Meredith can hardly decorate a room for Cassidy if the housemates are still living in the rooms. I'm sure she'll want Cassidy to have a lovely bedroom befitting a 5 year old girl. I know I would.
  #24  
Old 02-21-2009, 09:34 PM
Cardinal Cardinal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,237
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lindsey View Post
After rereading the custody agreement, I think you're right. They have until August 1st to move out but they can't be there while Cassidy is there? But Meredith can hardly decorate a room for Cassidy if the housemates are still living in the rooms. I'm sure she'll want Cassidy to have a lovely bedroom befitting a 5 year old girl. I know I would.
Something tells me that Cassidy will have a lovely bedroom by the time Meredith assumes primary custody. In the meantime, something tells me Cassidy will enjoy her time with her aunt Meredith and grandmother Linda regardless of the room's decorations.

JMO and good night.
__________________
The truth is rarely pure and never simple.
- Oscar Wilde
  #25  
Old 02-21-2009, 09:39 PM
Jester Jester is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,649
Quote:
Originally Posted by alterEgo© View Post
Yeah, that whole cooperating with LE did Scott Peterson a whole world of good in the court of public opinion. I'm sure it would have done the same for Jason Young.
I guess when the husband is guilty, it doesn't make that much difference whether he cooperates with the police or not. Scott cooperated, was guilty, and was convicted. Condit cooperated, was not guilty, was never named a suspect, had an alibi, and he's still a free man. Jason has not cooperated, has been named the slayer, is still a suspect 2 years+ after the murder, and will probably be convicted.
  #26  
Old 02-21-2009, 09:39 PM
BSNBREVARDNC BSNBREVARDNC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 422
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lindsey View Post
After rereading the custody agreement, I think you're right. They have until August 1st to move out but they can't be there while Cassidy is there? But Meredith can hardly decorate a room for Cassidy if the housemates are still living in the rooms. I'm sure she'll want Cassidy to have a lovely bedroom befitting a 5 year old girl. I know I would.
Maybe the hearing on damages for the WDS will solve the problem. If LF get the townhouse in Raleigh, the roommates can move in there.
  #27  
Old 02-21-2009, 09:41 PM
BSNBREVARDNC BSNBREVARDNC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 422
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jester View Post
I guess when the husband is guilty, it doesn't make that much difference whether he cooperates with the police or not. Scott cooperated, was guilty, and was convicted. Condit cooperated, was not guilty, was never named a suspect, had an alibi, and he's still a free man. Jason has not cooperated, has been named the slayer, is still a suspect 2 years+ after the murder, and will probably be convicted.
Good point. It's all about GUILT.
  #28  
Old 02-21-2009, 09:42 PM
Jester Jester is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,649
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lindsey View Post
And now back to Michelle Young case ....

I wonder if Meredith has moved either of her two housemates out yet so that she can have a pretty little room ready for Cassidy on Wednesday. Or if Linda is flying down from NY, they might just have to stay at a hotel if both housemates aren't moved out yet. IIRC, it's only 3 bedrooms in the house.
Do you really think Meredith would do anything to compromise the first stage in the transition of Cassidy to her new home? I doubt it. If anyone will be staying in a hotel or with friends, it will be the roommates, not Meredith.
  #29  
Old 02-21-2009, 09:50 PM
Jester Jester is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,649
Quote:
Originally Posted by BSNBREVARDNC View Post
Good point. It's all about GUILT.
Yup, all about guilt ... and very little to do with public opinion - which is always split pro/con. I'm sure that the investigation goes a little smoother if the immediate family of the victim cooperates, but a lack of cooperation doesn't completely rerail an investigation.
  #30  
Old 02-21-2009, 09:53 PM
Stellagant Stellagant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,312
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jester View Post
I guess when the husband is guilty, it doesn't make that much difference whether he cooperates with the police or not. Scott cooperated, was guilty, and was convicted. Condit cooperated, was not guilty, was never named a suspect, had an alibi, and he's still a free man. Jason has not cooperated, has been named the slayer, is still a suspect 2 years+ after the murder, and will probably be convicted.

fyi: Jason hasn't been arrested.
  #31  
Old 02-21-2009, 09:59 PM
awareness awareness is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: All Posts Are JMO/IMO
Posts: 1,218
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stellagant View Post
fyi: Jason hasn't been arrested.
I'd think Jester is aware of that. Jester's post didn't say Jason had been arrested. It was clearly their opinion they think Jason will be convicted in the future. The rest of the facts (not cooperated, named having slayed Michelle & Rylan, still a suspect 2+ years later) are true.

JMO/IMO
  #32  
Old 02-21-2009, 10:05 PM
Jester Jester is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,649
Quote:
Originally Posted by awareness View Post
I'd think Jester is aware of that. Jester's post didn't say Jason had been arrested. It was clearly their opinion they think Jason will be convicted in the future. The rest of the facts (not cooperated, named having slayed Michelle & Rylan, still a suspect 2+ years later) are true.

JMO/IMO
Thanks. It is my opinion that Jason will eventually be arrested and convicted regardless of public opinion and whether he has cooperated with police.
  #33  
Old 02-21-2009, 10:38 PM
Lindsey Lindsey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Middle Georgia
Posts: 2,108
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jester View Post
Do you really think Meredith would do anything to compromise the first stage in the transition of Cassidy to her new home? I doubt it. If anyone will be staying in a hotel or with friends, it will be the roommates, not Meredith.
No. I was talking about the housemates, not Meredith. Since at least one of the housemates is a long time (school) friend of Meredith's, I'm sure she is tickled pink for Meredith and will do whatever she needs to for Cassidy's visit. Probably the same can be said for the second woman but I don't think they go as far back. Not sure.


IMO
  #34  
Old 02-21-2009, 10:41 PM
Jester Jester is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,649
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lindsey View Post
No. I was talking about the housemates, not Meredith. Since at least one of the housemates is a long time (school) friend of Meredith's, I'm sure she is tickled pink for Meredith and will do whatever she needs to for Cassidy's visit. Probably the same can be said for the second woman but I don't think they go as far back. Not sure.


IMO
Sorry, I must have misunderstood. I completely agree. Meredith's roommates/friends will do everything they can to make Cassidy's transition as smooth as possible.
  #35  
Old 02-22-2009, 12:43 AM
Stellagant Stellagant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,312
Quote:
Originally Posted by awareness View Post
I'd think Jester is aware of that. Jester's post didn't say Jason had been arrested. It was clearly their opinion they think Jason will be convicted in the future. The rest of the facts (not cooperated, named having slayed Michelle & Rylan, still a suspect 2+ years later) are true.

JMO/IMO
It's not established fact that Jason is now guilty of murder and that is the part I responded to. He was named slayer in civil, not criminal court. Both of you seem to have trouble following the discussion.

Originally Posted by Jester
I guess when the husband is guilty, it doesn't make that much difference whether he cooperates with the police or not. Scott cooperated, was guilty, and was convicted. Condit cooperated, was not guilty, was never named a suspect, had an alibi, and he's still a free man. Jason has not cooperated, has been named the slayer, is still a suspect 2 years+ after the murder, and will probably be convicted.
  #36  
Old 02-22-2009, 12:51 AM
Stellagant Stellagant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,312
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kat4Eagles View Post
OT:
It now says an arrest is "imminent"..
Where have I heard that word before?

But,this is good news , and I must confess, I also thought Condit was hiding something...
I followed this case when I first got my computer and I thought I was a super sluether!!
That seems like such a long time ago, now with all these cases.
Chandra, Cherica,Danielle, Samantha, Laci, Bonnie, Nicole, Lori, Rachel, etc.
There was also some news on Rae Carruth I saw the other day,looks like the ex-Carolina Panther gained some weight since he has been eating prison food, and he has had 4 infractions since being incarcerated
I hope this will give the Levy's some closure, they carried themselves with class, grace and dignity while suffering the loss of their daughter.
Chandra.
I will be glad when the word "imminent" is used in the case of Michelle Young and really has meaning this time.

Kat

Just so I am not too off topic, Carruth is in prison in NC..
I'm puzzled how Carruth is connected to Michelle's murder or Chandra's?
  #37  
Old 02-22-2009, 12:54 AM
Kat4Eagles Kat4Eagles is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Philly
Posts: 6,952
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stellagant View Post
I'm puzzled how Carruth is connected to Michelle's murder or Chandra's?
Don't ask me.
I was talking about all the murders since Chandra Levy, and then I remembered this case, the Michelle Young case from North Carolina, and then I thought of Rae Carruth, and
then somehow I got off track.
It won't happen again.



Kat
  #38  
Old 02-22-2009, 12:58 AM
Kat4Eagles Kat4Eagles is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Philly
Posts: 6,952
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stellagant View Post
Off track and wayyyyy into left field. Lol
I apologize .
Oh, and the word imminent threw me off too.

Kat

PS..could you give me a chance to edit my posts?

Last edited by Kat4Eagles; 02-22-2009 at 01:02 AM.
  #39  
Old 02-22-2009, 01:02 AM
Stellagant Stellagant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,312
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lindsey View Post
No. I was talking about the housemates, not Meredith. Since at least one of the housemates is a long time (school) friend of Meredith's, I'm sure she is tickled pink for Meredith and will do whatever she needs to for Cassidy's visit. Probably the same can be said for the second woman but I don't think they go as far back. Not sure.


IMO
Maybe not quite tickled pink if they are paying rent and have to sleep elsewhere.
  #40  
Old 02-22-2009, 01:04 AM
Stellagant Stellagant is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,312
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kat4Eagles View Post
I apologize .
Oh, and the word imminent threw me off too.

Kat

PS..could you give me a chance to edit my posts?
ah, yes, it's been imminent for over two years now.
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All content Copyright Courtroom Television Network, LLC., All Rights Reserved.