january 19 - 22

alterEgo© · #1 01-19-2009, 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JHP

I suspect the timing of this visit was either the court ordered it or Jasons Attorney strongly suggested it.
Jason may not have had a choice.
JMO

The court would not order it.

Of course Jason has a choice. It's up to him, and him alone, to determine what is in the best interest of his child. For now anyway.

alterEgo© · #2 01-19-2009, 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barbara2

There are a very few that CLAIM to have seen this so called page. No verification has been given. It seems that the only ones who "saw" this page that no one can link are those that want Jason to remain a free man. IMO

Just like there were a very few that CLAIMED to have seen (while others read) the so called interview with Steve Money wherein he forgave his wife for her transgression. No verification has ever been given. It seems that the only ones who 'saw' this interview that no one can link are those that want Jason to fry. IMO

Barbara2 · #3 01-19-2009, 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alterEgo©

Just like there were a very few that CLAIMED to have seen (while others read) the so called interview with Steve Money wherein he forgave his wife for her transgression. No verification has ever been given. It seems that the only ones who 'saw' this interview that no one can link are those that want Jason to fry. IMO

It seems that whether someone saw it or not doesn't matter much now since the information in the warrant pretty much verifies that an affair did take place between Jason and Michelle Money.

alterEgo© · #4 01-19-2009, 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barbara2

It seems that whether someone saw it or not doesn't matter much now since the information in the warrant pretty much verifies that an affair did take place between Jason and Michelle Money.

Yup.

But it still doesn't change the fact that some interview, which is insisted by some to have occured, cannot be linked to so that those of us who missed it can witness it for ourselves.

At least with the 'coming down from a high' post, it was linked on this board. The Steve Money forgiveness interview has never been linked.

Kat4Eagles · #5 01-19-2009, 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alterEgo©

Just like there were a very few that CLAIMED to have seen (while others read) the so called interview with Steve Money wherein he forgave his wife for her transgression. No verification has ever been given. It seems that the only ones who 'saw' this interview that no one can link are those that want Jason to fry. IMO

I agree, and now we are can talk about something other than murder suspects or accomplices, we are talking about the people that are applying for custody of a child.

A custody case in which part is scheduled to be heard 02.04.09

So, everything gets a even closer look!!

So, who is the leezard MF refers to still living at home with and why?

Kat

Cardinal · #6 01-19-2009, 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kat4Eagles

I agree, and now we are can talk about something other than murder suspects or accomplices, we are talking about the people that are applying for custody of a child.

A custody case in which part is scheduled to be heard 02.04.09

So, everything gets a even closer look!!

So, who is the leezard MF refers to still living at home with and why?

Kat

Her pet iguana?

Happy MLK Day, everyone!

Kat4Eagles · #7 01-19-2009, 11:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cardinal

Her pet iguana?

Happy MLK Day, everyone!

Could be, I am just trying to find out.
Strange choice of word, whether they are meant for a person or pet, I don't know.

Kat

alterEgo© · #8 01-19-2009, 11:10 AM

I dunno Kat.

But I would think the judge would want to see something from the past 2 years to show Jason is unfit to have custody of his daughter. Something besides rumors of stuff that happened before Michelle was murdered which appears to have been lifted off msg boards.

Which is basically all the 'upon belief' allegations. Stuff they believe to be true but have no proof that it is.

Kat4Eagles · #9 01-19-2009, 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alterEgo©

I dunno Kat.

But I would think the judge would want to see something from the past 2 years to show Jason is unfit to have custody of his daughter. Something besides rumors of stuff that happened before Michelle was murdered which appears to have been lifted off msg boards.

Which is basically all the 'upon belief' allegations. Stuff they believe to be true but have no proof that it is.

Oh, definitely..

On all parties concerned, there should be a thorough background check to find what and who is in the best interest of the child.

And , not just based on rumors..you are right.

I saw the page everyone is talking about, she went on to say she did get along with her late father either.

I find all this very interesting.
Kat

Cardinal · #10 01-19-2009, 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kat4Eagles

Oh, definitely..

On all parties concerned, there should be a thorough background check to find what and who is in the best interest of the child.

And , not just based on rumors..you are right.

I saw the page everyone is talking about, she went on to say she did get along with her late father either.

I find all this very interesting.
Kat

I didn't get along with my father when I was Meredith's age. Would that show up on a background check?

Kat4Eagles · #11 01-19-2009, 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by confused

On Nov. 15 2006 at 1:46 pm MF's my space was made public on this web site. On Nov. 15 2006 at 5:13 pm it was posted by a barbara that the my space just went private. This barbara said she should have kept the info to herself until she checked it out more. I wonder how many people read it that 4 + hours before it went private? I'm still searching be back with more later.

There is a lot to read through but you can find the posts by looking at the time.

http://www.mermaidsinging.com/2006/1...g_murderer.htm

Thank you, Confused.

Kat

BiggerRedDog · #12 01-19-2009, 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by confused

On Nov. 15 2006 at 1:46 pm MF's my space was made public on this web site. On Nov. 15 2006 at 5:13 pm it was posted by a barbara that the my space just went private. This barbara said she should have kept the info to herself until she checked it out more. I wonder how many people read it that 4 + hours before it went private? I'm still searching be back with more later.
There is a lot to read through but you can find the posts by looking at the time.
http://www.mermaidsinging.com/2006/1...g_murderer.htm

Poster's names on that blog are below the post, confused. The 5:13pm post to which you refer was made by a Captain Joe, not a Barbara.

JHP · #13 01-19-2009, 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alterEgo©

The court would not order it.

Of course Jason has a choice. It's up to him, and him alone, to determine what is in the best interest of his child. For now anyway.

Are you sure? Because I have experienced a similar situation with an extended family member, and the Judge did order it.

alterEgo© · #14 01-19-2009, 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JHP

Are you sure? Because I have experienced a similar situation with an extended family member, and the Judge did order it.

And I'm sure there is paperwork petitioning the Judge to make such an order. As recently at Sept 2008, grandparents were banning together to get visitation laws established in NC since they don't exist today. And since they don't exist, under what authority would Meredith and Linda petition the court to order visitation for the weekend?

Cardinal · #15 01-19-2009, 11:30 AM

Quote:

And I'm sure there is paperwork petitioning the Judge to make such an order. As recently at Sept 2008, grandparents were banning together to get visitation laws established in NC since they don't exist today. And since they don't exist, under what authority would Meredith and Linda petition the court to order visitation for the weekend?

Is it possible the visitation was a condition of the continuance? Their attorney could have argued that the continuance would have the effect of further depriving them of time with Cassidy.

alterEgo© · #16 01-19-2009, 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cardinal

Is it possible the visitation was a condition of the continuance? Their attorney could have argued that the continuance would have the effect of further depriving them of time with Cassidy.

The plaintiff's atty would have no say in determining if an extention is to be granted to respond to the complaint.

Cardinal · #17 01-19-2009, 11:37 AM

Quote:

The plaintiff's atty would have no say in determining if an extention is to be granted to respond to the complaint.

But if he made the argument, the judge would likely consider it.

JMO

JHP · #18 01-19-2009, 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cardinal

Is it possible the visitation was a condition of the continuance? Their attorney could have argued that the continuance would have the effect of further depriving them of time with Cassidy.

Thank you Cardinal you explained it quite well.

alterEgo© · #19 01-20-2009, 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kat4Eagles

Is this allowed here? The last 2 paragraphs sound like a threat.
Postings recorded?

Kat

One that has been posted here time and time again....and a very empty one at that.

I guess some people don't understand what defamation, libel and slander really mean.

Or that's suing for such is a tort action that can only be brought by the party being defamed, libeled or slandered.

BSNBREVARDNC · #20 01-20-2009, 12:39 PM

Quote:

One that has been posted here time and time again....and a very empty one at that.

I guess some people don't understand what defamation, libel and slander really mean.

Or that's suing for such is a tort action that can only be brought by the party being defamed, libeled or slandered.

What was this in reference to? What were the last 2 paragraphs Kat wrote about?