Peterson Must Prove where Stacy Is

*am so exicted I get the laptop for a few weeks so I have a question for all of you*

Now, how do you think this law effects other cases where spouses think they can just divorce said missing spouse? What about cases like the francisco case and others, where the absentee spouse is never seen alive again?

Do you agree with this finding? I do. I think it should have to be proven in the family courts that there is EVIDENCE said spouse up and "left" or ran away in order for divorce to be granted.
Melanie McGuire said bill stuffed a dryer sheet in her mouth. Drew claims stacy just up and left him, for another man, of course.
And, christine fox claims that her husband nicholas, just never made it home from work that night. All are seeking divorces and or orders of protection......or they were. We all know that Drew cannot prove where stacy is. Just as christine cannot prove where nicholas is.

Peterson Must Prove Where Stacy Is

Suspected wife killer Drew Peterson wants to get a divorce from his missing wife Stacy, but first he’ll have to prove where she is – something the police would love to know.

Under the law in Illinois, where Peterson lives, a divorce can be granted for desertion or abandonment after a spouse has been gone more than a year – but a judge must be convinced that one party willingly walked out.

“Until Drew can show that Stacy definitely deserted him or is dead, a judge is not going to do anything,” Chicago divorce attorney Dion Davi told The ENQUIRER.

(oh drew that is such a bad picture of ya bud)


http://www.nationalenquirer.com/drew...ey/crime/63467

I can't believe he hasn't been arrested yet.

Originally Posted by grammybear

It sounds like to me Drews goose is cooked. He cannot prove where she is without the authorities getting information to prosecute him. If one partner is missing and the other applies for a divorce then the person who decides to file for divorce has to give up what they know.
I do not believe Drew will ever be able to prove that Stacy is alive. He is the only one who supposedly got a phone call from Stacy. Even her sister didn't get a call. You would think as close as the two sisters were she would have contacted Cassandra if she could. This case is purely what he has said. But there has been no contact from Stacy which does not set well with Drews story. I just don't think Drew can prove anything. So if has to prove where she is, which imo he knows where she is but won't tell which tells me that she is dead. I do not believe any of his stories at all. But I guess we will know in time.

jmoo

I wish his goose was cooked! I think he can't stand to be out of the limelight for 5 minutes so he starts something for the media to report. And maybe he wants to marry his current girlfiriend.

[Mayasmimi]

Just so yall know....I have no idea where my ex is. We were divorced....without me knowing where he was. Long, long ago.

I absolutely believe DP is responsible for Stacy's death. I never had to prove where my ex was to get a divorce. Guess I'm missing the point. Haven't been here forever. This just doesn't make sense. Certainly not taking sides with the freakshow.....but just don't understand.

Know what? Yall already know what you are talking about, and I guess I missed something. Carry on. My bad.

[BobbisAngel]

God save this 23 yr old dumb girl and don't allow Drew to get a divorce.
Interesting that he doesn't date women his own age or closer to it at least. I guess he figures it would be harder to control a older woman then some young still wet behind the ears kid. What I can't figure out is what these young girls see in that old goat!