Sentencing Dates

JBL · #1 11-03-2008, 11:12 AM

Dates to mark.

Alfred Beardsley to appear on Nov. 19 and produce the ring.
(Goldman suit)

Simpson and Stewart are scheduled to be sentenced Dec. 5
could face up to life in prison with the possibility of parole on the kidnapping conviction.
Each of the two armed robbery convictions carries a mandatory sentence of at least two years and as many as 30.

Former O.J. Co-Defendants Dec. 9

Alexander, 47, of Mesa, Ariz., could get up to six years
Ehrlich, 54, of Miami, could get up to five years
McClinton, 50, of Las Vegas,could get up to 11 years in prison
Cashmore, 41, of Las Vegas, faces up to five years

AnnInOhio · #2 11-03-2008, 06:56 PM

I second that thank ya.

warhorse46 · #3 11-06-2008, 02:31 PM

There is supposed to be a hearing tomorrow on the motion for a new trial.

book · #4 11-06-2008, 07:27 PM

Thank you JBL. Curious though why McClinton will receive more years than the others.

book · #5 11-06-2008, 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VictorV

Maybe he has a prior criminal record?

Could be. Thanks Victor.

JBL · #6 11-06-2008, 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by snowbird01

I think he wouldn't have had the carry permit if he did. People who have the permit are supposed to know something about the laws and what you can and cannot do with your gun. Armed robbery - even if its your 1st one as a favor to a friend - really is beyond stupid - its illegal and he knew it.

"even if its your 1st one "

Who knew

LMAO!

JBL · #7 11-06-2008, 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by warhorse46

There is supposed to be a hearing tomorrow on the motion for a new trial.

Whaaaaaaat!! -------- google is my friend .... shall return

JBL · #8 11-06-2008, 11:14 PM

Curses foiled again!

HMPH raining on my atta boy parade warhouse!! Why I outta......

http://courtgate.coca.co.clark.nv.us...asp/CaseNo.asp

left hand side click : Calender Day

drop down box click: Judge Jackie Glass

Change date for 11/7/2008

warhorse46 · #9 11-07-2008, 01:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JBL

Curses foiled again!

HMPH raining on my atta boy parade warhouse!! Why I outta......

http://courtgate.coca.co.clark.nv.us...asp/CaseNo.asp

left hand side click : Calender Day

drop down box click: Judge Jackie Glass

Change date for 11/7/2008

Ooh sorry didn't mean to rain on your parade. Thanks for the link, I could not find one.

JBL · #10 11-07-2008, 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by forensicpsy

He does. He was busted for pimping in 1998.

He also was busted for drugs and gun possesion, I think, in the 1980s.

imo

I believe your thinking of Alexander that was busted.

JBL · #11 11-07-2008, 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by warhorse46

Ooh sorry didn't mean to rain on your parade. Thanks for the link, I could not find one.

Heh heh.

I'd also looked up Grasso's court calendar WHOA - I thought OJ was his only client. He can't be doing to much babysitting for OJ with that docket.

JBL · #12 11-07-2008, 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by snowbird01

OK - you made us go look! at 9 am Cashmore and Stewart are asking for new trials, and - interesting news: Lucherini wants out as attorney! I wonder if he thinks he is about to be charged for something related to this case. His name did pop up on the tapes!

I don't understand it; Lucherini wants out? heh heh

My gut feeling is he was pushed out by someone who DOESN'T TRUST THE MESSENGER.

warhorse46 · #13 11-07-2008, 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JBL

Heh heh.

I'd also looked up Grasso's court calendar WHOA - I thought OJ was his only client. He can't be doing to much babysitting for OJ with that docket.

Awww poor OJ, doesn't have his own private lawyer @ his beck & call 24/7 like he did with Yale.

JBL · #14 11-07-2008, 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by forensicpsy

Please see my link above.

Post #17.

"alleged "

Aha, some one making up stories about my man, probably a spiteful ex alledging thingsl.

hahaha j/k

fbgweezer · #15 11-07-2008, 12:59 PM

you guys rock when it comes to sharing info.

JBL · #16 11-07-2008, 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by snowbird01

I remember the pimping came out in the trial - was it ever actually proved? The article didn't say anything about gun charge or drug bust, did it? As I asked; how could he have a legitimate carry permit if he had been convicted of those charges? The guy is really mad at OJ, isn't he? He just tried to do a friend a little favor.........lol

They're all FURIOUS! I would be to but hey they got sucked into that affable and may I add nefarious OJ persona.

Well except for Beardsley. He's not furious. Still hooked and in awe.

#17 11-07-2008, 01:16 PM

Anybody watching this hearing? I was in the kitchen when it started but if the allegations about the jury foreman are true, these men do deserve a new trial (and it really chaps me to say that).

I must admit I like the way OJ looks in jail garb though.

#18 11-07-2008, 01:20 PM

Motion denied. No hearing, no retrial...issues are preserved for appeal.

Yale asks for bail again, has a bail bondsman all lined up. Judge Glass says no again.

JBL · #19 11-07-2008, 01:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kara

Anybody watching this hearing? I was in the kitchen when it started but if the allegations about the jury foreman are true, these men do deserve a new trial (and it really chaps me to say that).

I must admit I like the way OJ looks in jail garb though.

LMAO those allegations from a spiteful attorney (s) about the jury foreman.

More in line with grasping at straws.

They took the foreman's words out of context. If you see the whole tape plus several articles where the foreman came forward to speak on his behalf regarding the accusations against him - IMO he was credible.

Like the rumours that the foreman held the jury hostage until the 13th day of the 13th hour of the 13th aniversary. hahahaha

JBL · #20 11-07-2008, 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kara

Motion denied. No hearing, no retrial...issues are preserved for appeal.

Yale asks for bail again, has a bail bondsman all lined up. Judge Glass says no again.

Missed it never loaded darn Las Vegas Now
http://www.lasvegasnow.com/
Watch live streaming coverage of O.J. Simpson requesting a new trial.

OMG remember last time he had a bailsbondsman set up. Jackie Glass asked who it was and he had to admit he really didn't have one and couldn't come up with a name. What a creature of the law. His proclamation not mine. Well there is one word in there I give credence to in describing him .

JBL · #21 11-07-2008, 01:34 PM

http://www.lasvegasnow.com/Global/story.asp?S=9310925

No New Trial for O.J. Simpson

Yale --->

<--- Jackie

#22 11-07-2008, 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by snowbird01

UH oh! I thought it was his comments following the trial - but the Pepsico thing - well that can certainly be checked to see if its true or not. Did Yale show or say he has any paperwork from Pepsico on that?

Grasso and Gallanter are on with Jami and they are just going over the jury interview, no mention of the Pepsico firing, unless I missed it.... I'm listening to Duffy's song "Mercy". I might sing it tonight but I need to hear it a few times if I'm gonna try it.

Any...on topic, I'm thinking if they had proof of the Pepsico firing, we would have been hearing more about that. If it's fictional, I would sue Grasso and Gallanter (if I were the foreman).

bearwds · #23 11-07-2008, 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JBL

http://www.lasvegasnow.com/Global/story.asp?S=9310925

No New Trial for O.J. Simpson

Yale --->

<--- Jackie

************************************

Aww.... Yale upset about Glass not letting convicted kidnappers "dress out" in their finery for court hearing. Guess no top hat and cane.

All motions denied as the trucks at construction site continue to "beep-beep-beep" in interviews. They are going backwards as well as Yale attempting to.

Jamie cuts off her guest who wants to talk about Obama and OJ. Jamie cuts him off (the lawyer who has the fine died beard) and says she will talk about it in her "Closing Remarks".

Oh joy.

bearwds

JBL · #24 11-07-2008, 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bearwds

************************************

Aww.... Yale upset about Glass not letting convicted kidnappers "dress out" in their finery for court hearing. Guess no top hat and cane.

All motions denied as the trucks at construction site continue to "beep-beep-beep" in interviews. They are going backwards as well as Yale attempting to.

Jamie cuts off her guest who wants to talk about Obama and OJ. Jamie cuts him off (the lawyer who has the fine died beard) and says she will talk about it in her "Closing Remarks".

Oh joy.

bearwds

Unfortunately it's NEVER her last word.

fbgweezer · #25 11-07-2008, 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bearwds

************************************

Aww.... Yale upset about Glass not letting convicted kidnappers "dress out" in their finery for court hearing. Guess no top hat and cane.

All motions denied as the trucks at construction site continue to "beep-beep-beep" in interviews. They are going backwards as well as Yale attempting to.

Jamie cuts off her guest who wants to talk about Obama and OJ. Jamie cuts him off (the lawyer who has the fine died beard) and says she will talk about it in her "Closing Remarks".

Oh joy.

bearwds

oh too bad about the clothes -- LOL -- I have read posts where folks base their belief that orenthal didn't commit murder because he would never have worn the outfit described.

bearwds · #26 11-07-2008, 02:00 PM

The sound you hear is me eating my words <chomp-chomp>...

Jamies "Last Word" was addressed to....ready for this..??

"My fellow black folks".

She basically ripped on the culture of thugism and irresponsibility.

Amazed.

bearwds

fbgweezer · #27 11-07-2008, 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bearwds

The sound you hear is me eating my words <chomp-chomp>...

Jamies "Last Word" was addressed to....ready for this..??

"My fellow black folks".

She basically ripped on the culture of thugism and irresponsibility.

Amazed.

bearwds

are you kidding? she didn't really say that. . .

bearwds · #28 11-07-2008, 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fbgweezer

are you kidding? she didn't really say that. . .

***********************

...did...did...did ....lol

Yale still whining about OJ to "I'm not an attorney" Ashley.

"OJ is not like your normal defendant"...his reasoning about why OJ should be treated differently than any other convicted robber.

Ok...I see.

bearwds

ps....Stewart is not in isolation anymore. General population.

JBL · #29 11-07-2008, 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fbgweezer

are you kidding? she didn't really say that. . .

VISUALS

fbgweezer: left hand on hip - right arm extended flexing wrist up to down finger extended: Oh no she di'nt!
bearwds: right hand on hip - left arm extended flexing wrist up to down finger extended : Oh yea she did!

TX

JBL · #30 11-07-2008, 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bearwds

***********************

...did...did...did ....lol

Yale still whining about OJ to "I'm not an attorney" Ashley.

"OJ is not like your normal defendant"...his reasoning about why OJ should be treated differently than any other convicted robber.

Ok...I see.

bearwds

ps....Stewart is not in isolation anymore. General population.

He's not like the other boys - Hey that's Michael Jackson thriller line ROFL

fbgweezer · #31 11-07-2008, 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JBL

VISUALS

fbgweezer: left hand on hip - right arm extended flexing wrist up to down finger extended: Oh no she di'nt!
bearwds: right hand on hip - left arm extended flexing wrist up to down finger extended : Oh yea she did!

TX

now that made me laugh out loud!

fbgweezer · #32 11-07-2008, 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bearwds

***********************

...did...did...did ....lol

Yale still whining about OJ to "I'm not an attorney" Ashley.

"OJ is not like your normal defendant"...his reasoning about why OJ should be treated differently than any other convicted robber.

Ok...I see.

bearwds

ps....Stewart is not in isolation anymore. General population.

well, he's right in one sense of the word -- orenthal isn't like your normal defendant. They don't expect celebrity treatment.

Poor CJ. I bet he wishes he'd never taken on the chore of 'rounding up some boys' for orenthal's caper.

JBL · #33 11-07-2008, 02:31 PM

Ah nothing like starting a day with OJ.

I'm going to miss him. If there's a will there's a way. I know he can do something illegal behind bars. I just know it!

bearwds · #34 11-07-2008, 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JBL

VISUALS

fbgweezer: left hand on hip - right arm extended flexing wrist up to down finger extended: Oh no she di'nt!
bearwds: right hand on hip - left arm extended flexing wrist up to down finger extended : Oh yea she did!

TX

***************************

Ha-ha....!!! Which finger..?? Makes a difference.

Glad to see some olde folks over here today. Trial seems like it was about a century ago, in the scheme of things.

Sentencing on Dec 5th. My guess is 7 years ....anybody????

bearwds

Lyndawitha"Y · #35 11-07-2008, 02:33 PM

I get so frustrated listening to these defense attny's...What's with Yale claiming OJ is special..and should be considered..because of his status as a "Famous Person".?..

I do think that Yale forgets that his client is now a convicted felon..and Photo Ops in "Fine Dress" is not part of the "Human Rights" and just maybe Yale better start looking for a NEW CLIENT..

Defense dont want to play the "Race Card"...but keep dealing that card at every turn!! Geesh.. And just where does the Defense get off claiming that one person (Foreman) could force ALL the jurors to decide a case based on his belief OJ "Should have" been found guilty 13 years ago"....It does seem to me since Defense cant find legal rulings at issue....they chose to pursuit investigating the jurors...They also chose to seat the 12 jurors..and name the alternates before the trial...as there was 2 African American jurors on the entire panel...Why not gamble for the lottery of picking the "Diliberating panel" after the case was presented?????Their gamble failed..so now they want to investigate the jurors..and so far, the only one they find any fault with is that Jury Foreman..

I dont recall just how many verdicts have been overturned due to "Jury Misconduct"..Anybody?? know the stats on that?

LMS

JBL · #36 11-07-2008, 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bearwds

***************************

Ha-ha....!!! Which finger..?? Makes a difference.

Glad to see some olde folks over here today. Trial seems like it was about a century ago, in the scheme of things.

Sentencing on Dec 5th. My guess is 7 years ....anybody????

bearwds

My visual used the index ROFL

Well these aren't the original ones but plucked from an article. If true I say 15 year minimum, maybe more. Is that kidnapping sentence x3 since victims are Fromong, Beardsley, Riccio and I'd say 1 more Cashmore was scared to leave he testified to GEEZ (and he came in with OJ)

http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2008...simpson-trial/

The kidnapping convictions each carry possible life sentences with no parole for five years.

The robbery convictions carry mandatory two-year sentences, plus an additional year, at minimum, for use of a deadly weapon.

The burglary conviction carries a mandatory two- to 15-year sentence and a possible fine of up to $15,000.

The coercion convictions carry mandatory one- to six-year sentences and a possible fine of up to $5,000.

The assault convictions carry mandatory one- to six-year sentences and a possible fine of up to $5,000.

Conspiracy to commit kidnapping carries a mandatory one- to six-year sentence and a possible fine of up to $5,000.

Conspiracy to commit robbery carries a mandatory one- to six-year sentence and a possible fine of up to $5,000.

Conspiracy to commit a crime is a gross misdemeanor that carries a possible probationable one-year sentence and/or $2,000 fine.

JBL · #37 11-07-2008, 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by snowbird01

Many people can and he'll have alot of help to do so - I guess its the last place he will have "juice" however.

He's just pulp fiction now. OMG Ok I'll stop! LMAO!

fbgweezer · #38 11-07-2008, 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bearwds

***************************

Ha-ha....!!! Which finger..?? Makes a difference.

Glad to see some olde folks over here today. Trial seems like it was about a century ago, in the scheme of things.

Sentencing on Dec 5th. My guess is 7 years ....anybody????

bearwds

Wow -- I have nothing to base a guess on but boy-oh-boy I hope it's 15.

AnnInOhio · #39 11-07-2008, 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fbgweezer

oh too bad about the clothes -- LOL -- I have read posts where folks base their belief that orenthal didn't commit murder because he would never have worn the outfit described.

What? OJ didn't want to wear "ugly ***" prison togs? You've got to be kidding - he was going in front of the judge, not a jury! She knows who she's dealing with and any assumption of innocence is over.

AnnInOhio · #40 11-07-2008, 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JBL

I don't understand it; Lucherini wants out? heh heh

My gut feeling is he was pushed out by someone who DOESN'T TRUST THE MESSENGER.

I could be wrong (shocking thought, I know) but I think in some states not all attorneys are certified to handle appeals cases to higher courts.