Conspiricy Theories, etc.

[JConnolly]

I don't know how long this thread will last, are we allowed to start a new thread that might be... well, uh, controversial? I'd really be interested in hearing any and all speculation/theories... ya know?

1. Tattoo on Ron that may have some 'significance' is especially interesting...

2. Fingerprints of so-far unidentified origin... ? Sounds like SOMEONE knows more than the average bear--

for starters............

Any contributions to this thread (for as long as it's here) regarding OJ Simpson, past or present are encouraged and welcome.

[caphill]

When OJ was acquitted for the murder of Nicole and Ron, the murders case remained unsolved. Is this case offically an open case? If so, is there anyone in LAPD that is working in any way this cold case.

I would think the LAPD would want to continue to work this case. There was evidence of two people involved. Run the DNA of the blood under Nicole fingernail that was not hers, Rons, or OJ's. Continue to run all those unidentified fingerprints on the wall next to the steps through the fingerprint date base.

[Tracian]

Originally Posted by caphill

When OJ was acquitted for the murder of Nicole and Ron, the murders case remained unsolved. Is this case offically an open case? If so, is there anyone in LAPD that is working in any way this cold case.

I would think the LAPD would want to continue to work this case. There was evidence of two people involved. Run the DNA of the blood under Nicole fingernail that was not hers, Rons, or OJ's. Continue to run all those unidentified fingerprints on the wall next to the steps through the fingerprint date base.

Naw, the LAPD didn't have to worry about finding the 'real murderers' because OJ was on the case.

Just because a case ends in an acquittal does not mean that the case remains open, Bonnie Blakely's case is not being worked from what we know, because the police and the DA's office do not have any evidence to support another suspect.

In the case of OJ, maybe they could investigate because even OJ in his 'fictional account' of how he would have butchered two people mentioned an accomplice.

[Tracian]

Crime: Sept 13
days of trial: 13
hours of deliberation:13
year to the day of acquittal of murder charges: 13


http://www.selfgrowth.com/articles/N...You_Think.html

From the link:

13 is considered a "Karmic Debt Number,"

[JConnolly]

Where has our conspiracist/speculator gone? I want to know about the TATTOO and FINGERPRINT that the poster knows something about but isn't telling!

Anyone with half a brain who watched any part of the Civil trial just has to be convinced beyond A SHADOW of a, not just REASONABLE doubt that the man who is responsible for the murders of Ron & Nicole is indeed OJ Simpson, and NOW, because of his continued criminal behavior is WHERE HE BELONGS!

Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition!

[caphill]

Originally Posted by Tracian

Naw, the LAPD didn't have to worry about finding the 'real murderers' because OJ was on the case.

Just because a case ends in an acquittal does not mean that the case remains open, Bonnie Blakely's case is not being worked from what we know, because the police and the DA's office do not have any evidence to support another suspect.

In the case of OJ, maybe they could investigate because even OJ in his 'fictional account' of how he would have butchered two people mentioned an accomplice.

Wouldn't you want to know whose blood was under Nicole's fingernail and who left all those unidentified fingerprints on the wall next to the steps.

What if there a was 2nd person involved in the murders. Wouldn't you want all killers of Nicole/Ron held accountable for these awful murders.

Originally Posted by caphill

Wouldn't you want to know whose blood was under Nicole's fingernail and who left all those unidentified fingerprints on the wall next to the steps.

What if there a was 2nd person involved in the murders. Wouldn't you want all killers of Nicole/Ron held accountable for these awful murders.

These questions are irrelevant much like most of the extraneous elements brought up by the defence like blood on both sides of the socks. Fact is OJ's blood was all over the crime scene and the victimes blood in his car and home, and from what I understand the fresh blood at the crime scene that tested to be Oj's was collected right away before he was even back from chicago so he must have been at the scene of the crime, so this alone should have wiped out any frame up theory. The jury was simply stupid and rascist.

[caphill]

Originally Posted by Mirage

These questions are irrelevant much like most of the extraneous elements brought up by the defence like blood on both sides of the socks. Fact is OJ's blood was all over the crime scene and the victimes blood in his car and home, and from what I understand the fresh blood at the crime scene that tested to be Oj's was collected right away before he was even back from chicago so he must have been at the scene of the crime, so this alone should have wiped out any frame up theory. The jury was simply stupid and rascist.

A question of the foreign blood found under Nicole's fingernail is irrelevant? It shows that someone else was at the murder scene that was likely clawed by Nicole.

I think the socks that had blood on both side that was said to have been worn by OJ which he was killing Nicole is relevent to the evidence. OJ's foot is in high top shoes with his dirty knee high dress socks and justs happens to get blood on both sides of the socks?

If he got rid of all the bloody clothes and the shoes, wonder why he separated the socks to throw in his clothes hamper. Where is common sense when it comes to some of the evidence.

[JBL]

I love hashbrowns even cornbeef hash- but 13 yr old OJ Trial HASH crosses the line of what's palatable

Originally Posted by caphill

A question of the foreign blood found under Nicole's fingernail is irrelevant? It shows that someone else was at the murder scene that was likely clawed by Nicole..

Firstly is this even confirmed? I dont recall this at the trial. And secondly it does nothing to negate the massive amount of evidence incriminating OJ.

Originally Posted by caphill

I think the socks that had blood on both side that was said to have been worn by OJ which he was killing Nicole is relevent to the evidence. OJ's foot is in high top shoes with his dirty knee high dress socks and justs happens to get blood on both sides of the socks?.

Firstly, the socks were thin and rolled up when he took them off, so blood just seeped through. Arguing about where it was located and saying it should have seeped this way instead of that way is nonsense.

Originally Posted by caphill

If he got rid of all the bloody clothes and the shoes, wonder why he separated the socks to throw in his clothes hamper. Where is common sense when it comes to some of the evidence.

Where is the common sense in butchering his ex wife and her bf ? There is not much common sense in most crimes.


You obviously think the entire lapd and forensic staff decided to frame a man for murder. Respected officers good records. A man they had been friends with. Ok but answer this. Once Oj was arrested, and interviewed, why did he never claim he was being framed? Wouldnt that be the first thing you would say if you were innocent and all this blood evidence suddenly started appearing? Why did he try to escape with a disguise, and gun? How many innocent men behave like that?

[warhorse46]

Originally Posted by mcannie1965

Look at the photos of O.J in the "BM" shoes taken within seconds of each other while O.J. is walking. In every one of the photos except one he has a hankerchief!

mho

Oh, so all of the photos had time/date stamps on them? Or did you take them to be able to know exactly the time span between the shots?

[warhorse46]

Originally Posted by mcannie1965

You know perfectly well I did not take them. Must this be reduced to snide remarks? I would appreciate if you quit this. TIA. I am giving my opinion on the photos.

He was walking and photographed as he walked. I don't think it would take minutes between each shot...and he had a handkerchief in every lapel pocket except one.

MHO

For all we know those photos could have been taken days or weeks apart, there is nothing to support your claim of fact that they were taken only seconds apart @ one time. Sorry if you do not like having the holes in your theories exposed. BTW, you waste your time & energy sending me PMs, they are ignored by me.

Originally Posted by gerald1

Doesn't say much for the seach for the truth does it. They would rather blame the jury. That's the easy way out for them.

The search already revealed OJ Simpson as the murderer. What search are you talking about?

[JConnolly]

I have to (begrudgingly) admit that there was a time I thought there may have been someone else involved at the murder scene. I always believed that OJ was definitely there, but so was somebody else. I'm trying to remember NOW, WHY back then, I thought this but I can't.

There also was a time, in the very beginning that I thought OJ might not have committed the horrendous murders... I was impressed with the time-line that was testified to, and was thinking there was no way OJ would have had enough time to do it-- IF the time-line was correct.

At the time of the trial back then, I was employed by a non-profit organization that helped welfare moms get back on track and teens (and the welfare moms) that took our "Life Skills" courses in order to gain employment along with self-esteem, confidence, etc. I mention this because (and please, no race-card comments!) it was an nearly an all-Black environment, I was one of two caucasian employees. There wasn't a lot of discussion about OJ's guilt or innocence until the verdict was handed down. I was SHOCKED and SURPRISED that EVERYONE who worked with me was STUNNED/ASTONISHED by the acquittal! I really thought they'd be estatic and they were disgusted!

I was glued to CTV during the trial, I taped what I couldn't watch live. I still have the tapes SOMEWHERE (I think!) -- but now I don't have a VCR lol.

With all the supporting facts surrounding the events of the last 13 years, I'm way beyond convinced that OJ is a murderer, kidnapper and thief. His gigantic ego forbade him from following any letters of the law.

[warhorse46]

Originally Posted by JConnolly

I have to (begrudgingly) admit that there was a time I thought there may have been someone else involved at the murder scene. I always believed that OJ was definitely there, but so was somebody else. I'm trying to remember NOW, WHY back then, I thought this but I can't.

There also was a time, in the very beginning that I thought OJ might not have committed the horrendous murders... I was impressed with the time-line that was testified to, and was thinking there was no way OJ would have had enough time to do it-- IF the time-line was correct.

At the time of the trial back then, I was employed by a non-profit organization that helped welfare moms get back on track and teens (and the welfare moms) that took our "Life Skills" courses in order to gain employment along with self-esteem, confidence, etc. I mention this because (and please, no race-card comments!) it was an nearly an all-Black environment, I was one of two caucasian employees. There wasn't a lot of discussion about OJ's guilt or innocence until the verdict was handed down. I was SHOCKED and SURPRISED that EVERYONE who worked with me was STUNNED/ASTONISHED by the acquittal! I really thought they'd be estatic and they were disgusted!

I was glued to CTV during the trial, I taped what I couldn't watch live. I still have the tapes SOMEWHERE (I think!) -- but now I don't have a VCR lol.

With all the supporting facts surrounding the events of the last 13 years, I'm way beyond convinced that OJ is a murderer, kidnapper and thief. His gigantic ego forbade him from following any letters of the law.

I am still inclined to think there was a second person participating in the double murder. I just do not see Ron or Nicole just standing around while the other is slashed to death & doing nothing.

[JConnolly]

Originally Posted by warhorse46

I am still inclined to think there was a second person participating in the double murder. I just do not see Ron or Nicole just standing around while the other is slashed to death & doing nothing.

Well, you do have a valid point there!

[JConnolly]

To the poster with the "name" of the owner of the fingerprint:

Just post the darn name, with no other words in your post. Just the NAME. It's not against TOS to post a name.

See? John Smith. I encourage someone to try to get me banned for posting a NAME. Just the NAME. No further explanation would be necessary. Then we can just end this mystery!

AFAIC, the mystery of the tattoo has been SOLVED. So just post the NAME of the person who owns the fingerprint.

Bet it won't happen. Even tho you can't possibly get in any trouble whatsoever. Will be waiting to see what the excuse is NOW.

[JConnolly]

What's the matter? Cat got your tongue? Or typing finger?