Michelle Young 9/1/09

[Cardinal]

Originally posted by Celiarun [*]

Considering Pat Young gave them the list of missing things in May 2007 and LE executed a s/w July, 2007 that is now sealed, I think it's likely that they found something they were looking for in July such as the new wallet. That wallet is the only item on their list that Pat told them about that was not searched for in Feb. '08. [/*]

Mrs. Young didn't say that the wallet was missing. According to the SWs, she says that $500 cash that was IN a new wallet was missing. Unless the bills were marked, how would they search for them?

Originally posted by Cardinal [*]

Mrs. Young didn't say that the wallet was missing. According to the SWs, she says that $500 cash that was IN a new wallet was missing. Unless the bills were marked, how would they search for them? [/*]

You made me go look at the warrant again. I think she is saying the money is inside the wallet. That's one of those things that could be debated for days. I am confused as to how LE took all the things that wasn't listed as what they were looking for.

At Oakland Hills dr. they took nothing.

Jason's Moms:

Adidas wh/ny size 12 running shoe In Warrant
Reebok wh/red size 12 basketball shoe In Warrant
death certificate of Michelle Young
Progress Energy ins. papers
Cassie's therapist report.
Jason's ins papers.

storage:
cream color sweater
3 pearl necklaces In Warrant
brown paper coach bag.with white rag and ribbons and paperwork.
1 pr child's flip flops size 6 pink
None of the other things were listed , where was the PC to take them?

[bookie]

Originally posted by shack [*]

You made me go look at the warrant again. I think she is saying the money is inside the wallet. That's one of those things that could be debated for days. I am confused as to how LE took all the things that wasn't listed as what they were looking for.

At Oakland Hills dr. they took nothing.

Jason's Moms:

Adidas wh/ny size 12 running shoe In Warrant
Reebok wh/red size 12 basketball shoe In Warrant
death certificate of Michelle Young
Progress Energy ins. papers
Cassie's therapist report.
Jason's ins papers.

storage:
cream color sweater
3 pearl necklaces In Warrant
brown paper coach bag.with white rag and ribbons and paperwork.
1 pr child's flip flops size 6 pink
None of the other things were listed , where was the PC to take them? [/*]

I think they are going to try to rely on that line about "any other items/instruments possibly used in the crime" or however they worded it. A judge may not go for it considering they took a death certificate issued AFTER the crime occured and Cassidy's therapist notes/report that were also made AFTER the crime.

Originally posted by bookie [*]


I think they are going to try to rely on that line about "any other items/instruments possibly used in the crime" or however they worded it. A judge may not go for it considering they took a death certificate issued AFTER the crime occured and Cassidy's therapist notes/report that were also made AFTER the crime. [/*]

Wonder if the blunders is why the DA didn't want the warrants released? I guess they will say Cassies flip flop was the murder weapon.

[tiny paw-prints]

Originally posted by shack [*]

Wonder if the blunders is why the DA didn't want the warrants released? I guess they will say Cassies flip flop was the murder weapon. [/*]

Your above post is the at lowest point you can stoop regarding this case, IMO.

Please review the autopsy report.

Hope this helps.

Lady Justice is calling Jason's name.

[tiny paw-prints]

Originally posted by shack [*]

(snipped).........

I guess they will say Cassies flip flop was the murder weapon. [/*]

IIRC, you've already posted that you don't care how Michelle died, so don't concern yourself about possible theories of how the murder occurred or what type of weapon was used.

Thank you.

[annalyzer]

Originally posted by shack [*]

You made me go look at the warrant again. I think she is saying the money is inside the wallet. That's one of those things that could be debated for days. I am confused as to how LE took all the things that wasn't listed as what they were looking for.

At Oakland Hills dr. they took nothing.

Jason's Moms:

Adidas wh/ny size 12 running shoe In Warrant
Reebok wh/red size 12 basketball shoe In Warrant
death certificate of Michelle Young
Progress Energy ins. papers
Cassie's therapist report.
Jason's ins papers.

storage:
cream color sweater
3 pearl necklaces In Warrant
brown paper coach bag.with white rag and ribbons and paperwork.
1 pr child's flip flops size 6 pink
None of the other things were listed , where was the PC to take them? [/*]

Some of the items seized has me puzzled. The child's flip flops. Were they two year old ones or new ones? Did they seize them to compare to footprints at the scene or what? MY's death certificate. Wouldn't they already have a copy of this? The child's therapy report. Isn't that confidential unless there was a court order for it?

Originally posted by tiny paw-prints [*]

IIRC, you've already posted that you don't care how Michelle died, so don't concern yourself about possible theories of how the murder occurred or what type of weapon was used.

Thank you. [/*]

We are talking about how they took things than wasn't listed on the warrant. You are posting total nonsense.

Originally posted by annalyzer [*]

Some of the items seized has me puzzled. The child's flip flops. Were they two year old ones or new ones? Did they seize them to compare to footprints at the scene or what? MY's death certificate. Wouldn't they already have a copy of this? The child's therapy report. Isn't that confidential unless there was a court order for it? [/*]

They were a size 6. I confess I don't know what age a child would wear a 6 and I have no one to ask today. They had to get a court order for Mrs. Young's records I would think the same would be true of the child. Did they think the warrant covered it? Mr. Young's ins. records? If they didn't have a copy of her death certificate all they had to do was ask their ME and he could give them one. Do you think they were reluctant to leave there with just 2 pr of shoes and a 3 necklaces so they just took stuff?

[Barbara2]

Originally posted by shack [*]

They were a size 6. I confess I don't know what age a child would wear a 6 and I have no one to ask today. They had to get a court order for Mrs. Young's records I would think the same would be true of the child. Did they think the warrant covered it? Mr. Young's ins. records? If they didn't have a copy of her death certificate all they had to do was ask their ME and he could give them one. Do you think they were reluctant to leave there with just 2 pr of shoes and a 3 necklaces so they just took stuff? [/*]

In my opinion, no.

[Barbara2]

Originally posted by janesdean [*]

Maybe it's "surrounded" by splatter because his hand was there while he was beating her, causing the splatter ??? [/*]

That's the way it reads in the search warrant but only the investigators know for sure. I guess we'll find out when the trial takes place.

[Cardinal]

Originally posted by janesdean [*]

Maybe it's "surrounded" by splatter because his hand print was placed there while he was beating her, causing the splatter to surround not cover his print ??? [/*]

Your post jogged my memory about something - the Birchleaf SW had "palmprints" as one of the items to be seized.

[5swab5]

Originally posted by janesdean [*]

Yes, but the warrant DOES state that he never used his key card again for the remainder of the time he was "checked in" that hotel. So, why would he check in, come back to the front desk area an hour later in dark clothes, and never re-enter his room again (no use of key card stated) ?? [/*]

YEP!

And therein lies the rub...Hmm, keycard not used except for Jason's original entry to his room.

Jason is seen in different clothes an hour later "heading" towards a side exit.

Side exit is blocked open with a rock.

Jason's wife and unborn child bludgeoned to death that very night.

Jason's other child and dog are left unharmed in the house.

Jason left early, only to drive half way to his meeting.

Jason "just had to swing by Brevard", even tho he had company coming from Charlotte for HOMECOMING WEEKEND. (Don't forget, he was a season ticket holder.)

Jason just so happened to call his SIL to go to the house to pick up a "print out" from his computer that was a belated Anniversary present. RiiiiiiiGHT!

OOPS, Meredith gets to find Michelle.

Jason has REFUSED to assist LE in the investigation, whatsoever. He lawyered up immediately and "hung-up" on the investigator, even as he meandered his way back to Raleigh, to collect Cassidy.

Jason has YET to attend ANY celebration of Michelle's life, he is MOVIN' ON. From day ONE, IMO. Forget that, he was already gone.

The End.

Geeze, why would LE even look at him in the first place?

Swabby

ETA: MOO

[5swab5]

Originally posted by janesdean [*]

I could see him propping the door open to run a few doors down for ice or vending machines, but not to go several floors down and leave his room wide open for anyone who came along. I imagine he carries a laptop and who knows what other valuables when he travels for business !! Why would he risk that being stolen ?? He left that hotel, and never returned, that's why no key card use was recorded ! [/*]

Very Good!

IIRC, they took Jason's laptop when he FINALLY got back to Raleigh.

Which is dumber, leaving it in your car or an unlocked motel room?

It had to be someplace.

MOO

Swabby

[Cardinal]

Originally posted by Barbara2 [*]

What "strong arguments" would those be? I've not seen them. [/*]

Hi, Barbara. Maybe you weren't here at the time.

[Cardinal]

Originally posted by Barbara2 [*]

So it sounds like there might be more than one, huh? [/*]

Or all a part of the same whole.

JMO

Originally posted by janesdean [*]

I could see him propping the door open to run a few doors down for ice or vending machines, but not to go several floors down and leave his room wide open for anyone who came along. I imagine he carries a laptop and who knows what other valuables when he travels for business !! Why would he risk that being stolen ?? He left that hotel, and never returned, that's why no key card use was recorded ! [/*]

Do you think someone would take a chance on someone being in a room and just walk in? When I travel I am usually with some friends . Just because one of us runs down to smoke or up the street for beer doesn't mean we all go. Never has any body ever tried to enter our room . The only time I ever had anything missing from a room the maid took it. It was found on her before she got away with it.

[5swab5]

Originally posted by shack [*]

Do you think someone would take a chance on someone being in a room and just walk in? When I travel I am usually with some friends . Just because one of us runs down to smoke or up the street for beer doesn't mean we all go. Never has any body ever tried to enter our room . The only time I ever had anything missing from a room the maid took it. It was found on her before she got away with it. [/*]

OK,

Whatever you claim.

But with ALL the other coincidences, it will not "ring true" with a jury.

MOO

Try taking the path of least resistance for once. They will.

MOO

Swabby

[5swab5]

Originally posted by Celiarun [*]

The SW didn't say the wallet wasn't missing, either. It did not quote Mrs. Young. The search warrant said: "Mrs. Young stated that she had a list of items that were missing from the crime scene." The s/w purposefully listed the money separately from the wallet and phrased it the way they did.

The s/w goes on to say: "As of this time these items have not been recovered or accounted for." Yet neither the $500 or the wallet was on the list of items they were looking for. That's significant, imvho. [/*]

IF LE really believed that the items that Pat Young claimed were missing, were really in dispute...why does the PC for the SW list those same items?

After all, if they believed her, why take another look at "Young" property for stolen items? My guess, is that she or another member has been caught in a lie.

MOO


Swabby


HOW many strings of pearls ARE we looking for. I can't wait for the insurance tape to be played in open court!

[Barbara2]

I doubt they expected to find $500 in cash laying around over a year after the fact, eh?

[5swab5]

Originally posted by Barbara2 [*]I doubt they expected to find $500 in cash laying around over a year after the fact, eh? [/*]

No Kidding.

Funny they didn't even mention that in the PC for the SW. Wonder why? LOL

Exactly HOW does an uncooperative, philandering, financially strapped husband hide "extra" cash?


Answer: He doesn't! 'Cause he doesn't have any! Michelle couldn't earn it fast enough for his games and ways of disposing of it.

MOO

Swabby



WHERE IS Michelle & Rylan's headstone, BTW?
We now have proof of trips to Puerto Rico, Myrtle Beach, Montana, New England, Las Vegas....to name a few.

How about a trip to a Stone Mason and an engraver in Raleigh.

Nah, he can't be bothered, he was movin' on before Michelle was murdered, why bother looking back now?

POOR CASSIDY!

[lonetraveler]

Originally posted by bookie [*]


Surrounded by, not covering with. It's very possible the dna is sweat from him tounching the wall as he leaned down to pick something up from his closet and not related to the crime at all. [/*]

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
A partial print (surrounded by blood splatter), not covered with blood splatter........................................th at usually means that whatever made the print was present when the blood splattered, and blocked the blood from contacting the surface behind the partial print. If the partial print was made after the blood splattered, blood would be under it. If the partial print was made before the blood splattered, blood would have covered it during the splatter. Think again.

[bookie]

Originally posted by janesdean [*]

Hey gojo, how do you explain Jason never re-entering his room that night with his key card ? And the ole "he propped the door open" just doesn't get it !! [/*]

It may not cut it for you but unless you are on a jury in a trial where he is the defendant then it really doesn't matter. All it takes is 1 person on that jury that has propped a door open to create reasonable doubt. And if I'm not mistaken JDI's have said they have propped doors open as well as JII's.

[bookie]

Originally posted by janesdean [*]

You state he was back in his room "absolutely" ? How do you come up with that when the warrant plainly states he never used his key card again, not that nite, not the next day. The key card was never used again until the MAID used it the next day after check out time, to clean THE UNUSED ROOM ????? [/*]

Where does it state the room was unused? Not in the warrant.

[bookie]

Originally posted by montauk66 [*]I think the blood spatter could very important. IF A JURY believes the print was made during the attack, then that does the exact same job as a gas reciept or eye witness or other smoking gun that some are calling for. [/*]

The jury is going to be asking whose size 10 shoe print was left. And if they follow the law and do their job there is reasonable doubt all over that shoe impression if the DA can't put a size 10 shoe in Jason's possession.

[texasgal]

Still praying for justice for the murder of Michelle and her little baby boy ..

And for safety and sanity for Cassidy ..

[JHP]

Originally posted by onederwomyn [*]

Wouldn't they really just have to put the size 12 shoe in his possession? I mean...just to prove he was there? Maybe he had help, maybe he wore the smaller size shoe with it....but wouldn't they really just have to have one shoe print be tied to him?

Where did those size 12 that they have a receipt for go? Who cares about the size 10 shoe. If the size 12 shoe was Jason's and it left a bloody footprint, Jason was there. You could say they took it out of the closet, but then where did it go? They would be trying to frame him and then toss the shoe? You would toss it where it would be found if you want to frame him.

The bloody print from a size 10 and the one from the size 12 tell produce these scenarios (assuming the size 12 is Jason's shoe print):
*He did it and he had help
*He did it and wore a size 10 on one foot to throw off police
*It was done by two people, not Jason...but trying to frame Jason and used one of his shoes (that hasn't been found)

Given all of the circumstantial evidence, what would you arrive at?

Also...just for the sake of perpetuating the "small shoe" argument, my husband's crap lawn shoes are a 10.5, he now wears an 11.5. I had my best friend check her husband's. His old nike crap lawn sneakers are 11.5 and he now wears a 13. Neither of them are 2 sizes, but getting there.... [/*]

You have an excellent point there. I'm sure LE has more evidence then is out there.
JMO

[Kat4Eagles]

Wow,22 months to the day this crime happened, and 22 months later, I am not sure we have a case against anyone.

If you read the new article in today's WRAL concerning the Cooper case and the s/w's possibly being released, you will see that the DA has argued against releasing them.
That they have been sealed 2x for a total of 60 days.

So, thinking this case is in the D A's hands, may or may not be true.

I hope everyone had a good weekend, spending 5 days at the beach makes it hard to come back..!!

Hope everyone in the path of the storm is safe.

I only have one question today, why did they take Michelle's death certificate, if it was only a copy?


Kat


ETA The Cooper warrants have just been released, I don't have a link though......sorry!!

[bookie]

Originally posted by onederwomyn [*]

Wouldn't they really just have to put the size 12 shoe in his possession? I mean...just to prove he was there? Maybe he had help, maybe he wore the smaller size shoe with it....but wouldn't they really just have to have one shoe print be tied to him?

Where did those size 12 that they have a receipt for go? Who cares about the size 10 shoe. If the size 12 shoe was Jason's and it left a bloody footprint, Jason was there. You could say they took it out of the closet, but then where did it go? They would be trying to frame him and then toss the shoe? You would toss it where it would be found if you want to frame him.

The bloody print from a size 10 and the one from the size 12 tell produce these scenarios (assuming the size 12 is Jason's shoe print):
*He did it and he had help
*He did it and wore a size 10 on one foot to throw off police
*It was done by two people, not Jason...but trying to frame Jason and used one of his shoes (that hasn't been found)

Given all of the circumstantial evidence, what would you arrive at?

Also...just for the sake of perpetuating the "small shoe" argument, my husband's crap lawn shoes are a 10.5, he now wears an 11.5. I had my best friend check her husband's. His old nike crap lawn sneakers are 11.5 and he now wears a 13. Neither of them are 2 sizes, but getting there.... [/*]

I've been married to my husband for almost 25 years. He was in his mid 20's when we met. He has always worn the same size shoe. He's never owned a pair smaller (or larger) then an 11.5

I don't know what I would arrive at. It would depend on expert testimony and evidence. The police would have to put any size 10 shoe in Jason's possession for me to base his guilt on a size 10 impression. They would have to prove he left the hotel that night and never went back to his room there.

[Kat4Eagles]

[quote]Originally posted by Kat4Eagles [*]Wow,22 months to the day this crime happened, and 22 months later, I am not sure we have a case against anyone.

If you read the new article in today's WRAL concerning the Cooper case and the s/w's possibly being released, you will see that the DA has argued against releasing them.
That they have been sealed 2x for a total of 60 days.

So, thinking this case is in the D A's hands, may or may not be true.

I hope everyone had a good weekend, spending 5 days at the beach makes it hard to come back..!!

Hope everyone in the path of the storm is safe.

I only have one question today, why did they take Michelle's death certificate, if it was only a copy?


Kat


ETA The Cooper warrants have just been released.

Here is the link.

www.wral.com/news/local/story/3467543

[Debb]

[quote]Originally posted by Kat4Eagles [*]

Originally posted by Kat4Eagles [*]Wow,22 months to the day this crime happened, and 22 months later, I am not sure we have a case against anyone.

If you read the new article in today's WRAL concerning the Cooper case and the s/w's possibly being released, you will see that the DA has argued against releasing them.
That they have been sealed 2x for a total of 60 days.

So, thinking this case is in the D A's hands, may or may not be true.

I hope everyone had a good weekend, spending 5 days at the beach makes it hard to come back..!!

Hope everyone in the path of the storm is safe.

I only have one question today, why did they take Michelle's death certificate, if it was only a copy?


Kat


ETA The Cooper warrants have just been released.

Here is the link.

www.wral.com/news/local/story/3467543 [/*]

Thanks for the link. Very interesting.

I guess the small red marks with scratches on husband's neck, could be an insect bite and that he scratched it himself or there was an altercation with his wife and she scratched him. That could explain why she lost a fingernail that police retrieved from the house. I wonder how husband didn't throw it out before police searched, since he was cleaing so much? Also, what kind of cleaning solution was he using and why didn't police take it?

I have so many questions now, I'm not sure where to start.

Originally posted by onederwomyn [*]

Wouldn't they really just have to put the size 12 shoe in his possession? I mean...just to prove he was there? Maybe he had help, maybe he wore the smaller size shoe with it....but wouldn't they really just have to have one shoe print be tied to him?

Where did those size 12 that they have a receipt for go? Who cares about the size 10 shoe. If the size 12 shoe was Jason's and it left a bloody footprint, Jason was there. You could say they took it out of the closet, but then where did it go? They would be trying to frame him and then toss the shoe? You would toss it where it would be found if you want to frame him.

The bloody print from a size 10 and the one from the size 12 tell produce these scenarios (assuming the size 12 is Jason's shoe print):
*He did it and he had help
*He did it and wore a size 10 on one foot to throw off police
*It was done by two people, not Jason...but trying to frame Jason and used one of his shoes (that hasn't been found)

Given all of the circumstantial evidence, what would you arrive at?

Also...just for the sake of perpetuating the "small shoe" argument, my husband's crap lawn shoes are a 10.5, he now wears an 11.5. I had my best friend check her husband's. His old nike crap lawn sneakers are 11.5 and he now wears a 13. Neither of them are 2 sizes, but getting there.... [/*]

Given the fact that nearly eight months have elapsed since the s/w was served and no arrest is a strong indication to me that more is required than just ownership of a size 12 shoe. The fact that the crime scene was steps away from the man's closet might be a factor in the crime. The shoe may have been used to beat Michelle. That's not proof Jason was the killer.

[annalyzer]

Originally posted by onederwomyn [*]

So, someone beat her with a shoe from her husband's closet? That would be poor planning, as it seems it may take a while to kill someone with a shoe...especially one that isn't a high heel or something of that nature. If this was premeditated, logic tells me the murder weapon was not a shoe.

[/*]

Since there was an attempt to strangle I don't think the bludgeoning was planned. But I agree, I hardly doubt a shoe was used.

[Kat4Eagles]

Originally posted by Debb [*]

Thanks for the link. Very interesting.

I guess the small red marks with scratches on husband's neck, could be an insect bite and that he scratched it himself or there was an altercation with his wife and she scratched him. That could explain why she lost a fingernail that police retrieved from the house. I wonder how husband didn't throw it out before police searched, since he was cleaing so much? Also, what kind of cleaning solution was he using and why didn't police take it?

I have so many questions now, I'm not sure where to start. [/*]

You are very welcome, and of course there is a NC thread for that case.

I stiil can not figure out some of the stuff going on in this case, like grabbing Michelle's death certificate..

What was the purpose of that?

I guess it would be safe to say that L E and Jason do not have a very good relationship at this point.....I guess they are at a stalemate.

I am not confident that the statement that the DA now has the case has much significance either.

The D A always has had this case.

They work closely with LE , are very much involved, and updated and consulted along the way..

22 months today.

Kat

[Kat4Eagles]

Originally posted by kingcole [*]

Howdy, One. You seem to think the bloody shoe print on the pillow was size 12. Last I heard the cops were waiting for the Chinese to make a size 12 for comparison. Who you reckon left the #10?

==Kingcole [/*]

Howdy King,

Good to see you.
You reckon some of the other evidence listed in the s/w's could be explained and accounted for?

The different shirts are easy .
He checked in wearing one shirt, got cleaned up, then put on another heavier shirt, and probably went out in the car to get some stuff he needed to brief himself on before his meeting.
The temperature had really fallen that nite.

Then he might have went outside again to put something away.

I never heard whether Jason smoked, did he?

I often bring more than I need in to our hotel room, and then go through it, then take what I don't need down to the car...

If he was only gone for a few minutes, he left the door open.

Only someone who wants those things to be sinister, will look at them that way.

Me?

I see an innocent person who has a one man wrecking crew filled with vengeance out to get him.




Kat

[awareness]

Originally posted by Kat4Eagles [*]Wow,22 months to the day this crime happened, and 22 months later, I am not sure we have a case against anyone.

If you read the new article in today's WRAL concerning the Cooper case and the s/w's possibly being released, you will see that the DA has argued against releasing them.
That they have been sealed 2x for a total of 60 days.

So, thinking this case is in the D A's hands, may or may not be true.

I hope everyone had a good weekend, spending 5 days at the beach makes it hard to come back..!!

Hope everyone in the path of the storm is safe.

I only have one question today, why did they take Michelle's death certificate, if it was only a copy?


Kat


ETA The Cooper warrants have just been released, I don't have a link though......sorry!! [/*]

While apparently some may need help with reading comprehension.... Its very clear to me who the SUSPECT is and yes, its the Jason Lynn Young you've been so keen on supporting and defending all these months.

Originally posted by Kat4Eagles [*]

Howdy King,

Good to see you.
You reckon some of the other evidence listed in the s/w's could be explained and accounted for?

The different shirts are easy .
He checked in wearing one shirt, got cleaned up, then put on another heavier shirt, and probably went out in the car to get some stuff he needed to brief himself on before his meeting.
The temperature had really fallen that nite.

Then he might have went outside again to put something away.

I never heard whether Jason smoked, did he?

I often bring more than I need in to our hotel room, and then go through it, then take what I don't need down to the car...

If he was only gone for a few minutes, he left the door open.

Only someone who wants those things to be sinister, will look at them that way.

Me?

I see an innocent person who has a one man wrecking crew filled with vengeance out to get him.




Kat [/*]

lol we KNOW what you see.

Question is, what does LE see and clearly they are seeing Jason Lynn Young.

JMO/IMO

[Barbara2]

Originally posted by Kat4Eagles [*]

<snipped>

I see an innocent person who has a one man wrecking crew filled with vengeance out to get him.




Kat [/*]

I think you might need to get to the eye doctor and get some new glasses so you can see more clearly. JMO

[Kat4Eagles]

Originally posted by awareness [*]

While apparently some may need help with reading comprehension.... Its very clear to me who the SUSPECT is and yes, its the Jason Lynn Young you've been so keen on supporting and defending all these months.




lol we KNOW what you see.

Question is, what does LE see and clearly they are seeing Jason Lynn Young.


JMO/IMO [/*]

I am sure they are or were, but we don't know if or when the investigation took them somewhere else completely different.

What about that last sealed warrant?

I can't call guilty on what is known here,
Jason had no signs of a bad temper or anything to that effect.

Should I convict a man because he was accused of a dumb ring swallowing story, or have the fashion police arrest him for sunglasses and a red tie?

Nope, not I.

Kat

[Kat4Eagles]

Originally posted by Barbara2 [*]

I think you might need to get to the eye doctor and get some new glasses so you can see more clearly. JMO [/*]

22 months later?

I think it will be others who need to start looking for another suspect.

Nope, not I.


Kat

[Barbara2]

Originally posted by Kat4Eagles [*]

22 months later?

I think it will be others who need to start looking for another suspect.

Nope, not I.


Kat [/*]

I think you are going to be disappointed. I doubt that the investigators would agree with your wishful thinking. JMO