In Session Message Boards  

Go Back   In Session Message Boards > Michelle Young

 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-30-2008, 06:16 AM
Lynne Lynne is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mr. Roger's Neighborhood
Posts: 123
Michelle Young 8-30-08

I have been following the Michelle Young murder case since November of 2006 and was wondering if, in light of the latest release of the search warrants, anyone has any doubts as to Jason's involvment in this double murder? I certaintly don't.

Last edited by Lynne; 08-30-2008 at 06:26 AM.
  #2  
Old 08-30-2008, 07:13 AM
BiggerRedDog BiggerRedDog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 239
Re: Michelle Young 8-30-08

Quote:
Originally posted by Lynne [*]I have been following the Michelle Young murder case since November of 2006 and was wondering if, in light of the latest release of the search warrants, anyone has any doubts as to Jason's involvment in this double murder? I certaintly don't. [/*]
Hello Lynne. Some still have doubts, some don't. Given what's known and what can be surmised, I don't have doubts. I do have doubts about what may or may not stand up in a court of law, at this point.
  #3  
Old 08-30-2008, 09:24 AM
Hecate
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
bumping for the nonpoliticos

Hecate
  #4  
Old 08-30-2008, 09:59 AM
Cardinal Cardinal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,237
Re: Re: Michelle Young 8-30-08

Quote:
Originally posted by BiggerRedDog [*]Hello Lynne. Some still have doubts, some don't. Given what's known and what can be surmised, I don't have doubts. I do have doubts about what may or may not stand up in a court of law, at this point. [/*]
I'm still willing to give Jason Young the benefit of the doubt, because he hasn't been indicted (that we know), there hasn't been a trial, and we haven't seen all of the evidence. I do find the pc in the SWs that were recently unsealed to be strongly indicative, but I don't think it would be enough to convict him.

JMO
__________________
The truth is rarely pure and never simple.
- Oscar Wilde
  #5  
Old 08-30-2008, 02:09 PM
Hecate
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
bumping

Hecate
  #6  
Old 08-30-2008, 02:14 PM
tiny paw-prints tiny paw-prints is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: southern california
Posts: 5,629
Since November 2006 and Jason's consistent lack of cooperation, his behavior and actions during the past 22+ months have brought forth strong Evidence.

For every month, week and day that goes by--there's more direct and circumstantial evidence, i.e., building a case around him.

Lady Justice is calling Jason's name. IMO
  #7  
Old 08-30-2008, 08:18 PM
HI_CYCLE
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
WHY DID NC WANTED CLEAN UP MICHELLE`S

Well,well, well......What happed to scare NC Wanted? Check out the trash has been removed and the picture of Michelle and JASON that had SUSPECT has been cleaned up.


http://www.ncwanted.com/ncwanted_home/story/3401466/
Authorities have never called Jason Young a suspect or person of interest in the case, but in multiple search warrant affidavits, they have characterized him as being unwilling to help investigators.

He talked with investigators the day his wife's body was found and later gave fingerprints under a court order, but has generally been uncooperative, they have said.

From the perspective of a defense attorney, Shanahan said that if he were representing Jason Young, he would urge him not to talk to investigators.
.................................................. ...............................................
Look`s like scout may have been spanked also,she has removed pictures posted on her board a couple days ago and having to remind her JDI to be a little more careful with their posts.
I suspect MR. Smith is doing the spanking and it`s about time.Something coming down............
  #8  
Old 08-30-2008, 08:22 PM
HI_CYCLE
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by tiny paw-prints [*]Since November 2006 and Jason's consistent lack of cooperation, his behavior and actions during the past 22+ months have brought forth strong Evidence.

For every month, week and day that goes by--there's more direct and circumstantial evidence, i.e., building a case around him.

Lady Justice is calling Jason's name. IMO [/*]
I dont think so.
http://www.ncwanted.com/ncwanted_home/story/3401466/
"Authorities have never called Jason Young a suspect or person of interest in the case"
  #9  
Old 08-30-2008, 08:47 PM
shack
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by HI_CYCLE [*] I dont think so.
http://www.ncwanted.com/ncwanted_home/story/3401466/
"Authorities have never called Jason Young a suspect or person of interest in the case" [/*]
People thought that emails pointing out the errors of their ways wouldn't work. Maybe they don't like the word libel.
  #10  
Old 08-30-2008, 08:51 PM
tiny paw-prints tiny paw-prints is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: southern california
Posts: 5,629
Quote:
Originally posted by HI_CYCLE [*]Well,well, well......

(snipped) Something coming down............
[/*]
I agree!!

Lady Justice is calling Jason's name.

Echos from Raleigh to the Mountains of Brevard...

1-2 weeks? Max 3 weeks. JMG/IMO
  #11  
Old 08-30-2008, 08:58 PM
HI_CYCLE
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by tiny paw-prints [*]

I agree!!

Lady Justice is calling Jason's name.

Echos from Raleigh to the Mountains of Brevard...

1-2 weeks? Max 3 weeks. JMG/IMO [/*]
NOPE, pictures wouldn`t be coming down and wrongful accusation disappearing if,Justice was calling Jason's name. But you already know that. Good try.
  #12  
Old 08-30-2008, 08:59 PM
HI_CYCLE
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by shack [*]
People thought that emails pointing out the errors of their ways wouldn't work. Maybe they don't like the word libel. [/*]
  #13  
Old 08-30-2008, 08:59 PM
shack
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by tiny paw-prints [*]

I agree!!

Lady Justice is calling Jason's name.

Echos from Raleigh to the Mountains of Brevard...

1-2 weeks? Max 3 weeks. JMG/IMO [/*]
I think Lady justice may be getting ready to call some body but I don't think it is Jason Young. I think who lady Justice is after is who made the bogus Craigs list and convinced NCWanted to run with it. I wouldn't want to be in their shoes.
  #14  
Old 08-30-2008, 09:03 PM
tiny paw-prints tiny paw-prints is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: southern california
Posts: 5,629
Quote:
Originally posted by HI_CYCLE [*]

(snipped)

.................................................. ...............................................
Look`s like scout may have been spanked also,she has removed pictures posted on her board a couple days ago and having to remind her JDI to be a little more careful with their posts.
I suspect MR. Smith is doing the spanking and it`s about time.Something coming down............
[/*]
Are you afraid to register as a member over there?

Just curious.

Because several of you JII's are posting here about what is posted over there.

IIRC, Coldwater has already warned everybody here about that.

Hope this helps.

Last edited by tiny paw-prints; 08-30-2008 at 09:06 PM.
  #15  
Old 08-30-2008, 09:07 PM
annalyzer annalyzer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,276
Re: WHY DID NC WANTED CLEAN UP MICHELLE`S

Quote:
Originally posted by HI_CYCLE [*]Well,well, well......What happed to scare NC Wanted? Check out the trash has been removed and the picture of Michelle and JASON that had SUSPECT has been cleaned up.


http://www.ncwanted.com/ncwanted_home/story/3401466/
Authorities have never called Jason Young a suspect or person of interest in the case, but in multiple search warrant affidavits, they have characterized him as being unwilling to help investigators.

He talked with investigators the day his wife's body was found and later gave fingerprints under a court order, but has generally been uncooperative, they have said.

From the perspective of a defense attorney, Shanahan said that if he were representing Jason Young, he would urge him not to talk to investigators.
.................................................. ...............................................
Look`s like scout may have been spanked also,she has removed pictures posted on her board a couple days ago and having to remind her JDI to be a little more careful with their posts.
I suspect MR. Smith is doing the spanking and it`s about time.Something coming down............
[/*]
Also at your link: "A former federal prosecutor says that newly released search warrants in the 2006 murder case of Michelle Young show investigators seem to be building a case around her husband, Jason Young.

"Reading between the lines of the search warrant, he's their primary suspect," Kieran Shanahan said Tuesday."
  #16  
Old 08-30-2008, 09:07 PM
HI_CYCLE
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by shack [*]

I think Lady justice may be getting ready to call some body but I don't think it is Jason Young. I think who lady Justice is after is who made the bogus Craigs list and convinced NCWanted to run with it. I wouldn't want to be in their shoes. [/*]
And...I have a pretty good idea who that is.Maybe people will learn, playing follow the leader can some time be dangerous.
  #17  
Old 08-30-2008, 09:14 PM
HI_CYCLE
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by tiny paw-prints [*]

Are you afraid to register as a member over there?

Just curious.

Because several of you JII's are posting here about what is posted over there.

IIRC, Coldwater has already warned everybody here about that.

Hope this helps. [/*]
Information from all over the internet is posted here every day.Remember, we own what we write. No I would NEVER trust her with my personal information.
  #18  
Old 08-30-2008, 09:15 PM
tiny paw-prints tiny paw-prints is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: southern california
Posts: 5,629
Quote:
Originally posted by HI_CYCLE [*]NOPE, pictures wouldn`t be coming down and wrongful accusation disappearing if,Justice was calling Jason's name. But you already know that. Good try. [/*]
You might want to be more focused on the evidence in this case.

Has the video clip from Hampton Inn depicting Jason checking in wearing a light-colored shirt and 1 hr later his leaving with a dark shirt--been pulled from the public's view yet?
  #19  
Old 08-30-2008, 09:16 PM
shack
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by tiny paw-prints [*]

Are you afraid to register as a member over there?

Just curious.

Because several of you JII's are posting here about what is posted over there.

IIRC, Coldwater has already warned everybody here about that.

Hope this helps. [/*]
Why would anyone want to register over there and give them access to your isp number? I may not be a genius but I'm smarter than that.
  #20  
Old 08-30-2008, 09:17 PM
bookie bookie is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,385
Quote:
Originally posted by HI_CYCLE [*]Information from all over the internet is posted here every day.Remember, we own what we write. No I would NEVER trust her with my personal information. [/*]

We can link other sites, we just can't copy and paste actual posts here.
  #21  
Old 08-30-2008, 09:17 PM
HI_CYCLE
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: WHY DID NC WANTED CLEAN UP MICHELLE`S

Quote:
Originally posted by annalyzer [*]

Also at your link: "A former federal prosecutor says that newly released search warrants in the 2006 murder case of Michelle Young show investigators seem to be building a case around her husband, Jason Young.

"Reading between the lines of the search warrant, he's their primary suspect," Kieran Shanahan said Tuesday." [/*]
HE also stated"Shanahan said that if he were representing Jason Young, he would urge him not to talk to investigators."
  #22  
Old 08-30-2008, 09:19 PM
tiny paw-prints tiny paw-prints is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: southern california
Posts: 5,629
Quote:
Originally posted by annalyzer [*]

Also at your link: "A former federal prosecutor says that newly released search warrants in the 2006 murder case of Michelle Young show investigators seem to be building a case around her husband, Jason Young.

"Reading between the lines of the search warrant, he's their primary suspect," Kieran Shanahan said Tuesday." [/*]
"Reading between the lines...."

IIRC, that's kinda what Sheriff Harrison suggested when he commented upon the "relationship" between MM and Jason?

As well as "I wonder what the little girl saw" ? IMO
  #23  
Old 08-30-2008, 09:23 PM
bookie bookie is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,385
Re: Re: WHY DID NC WANTED CLEAN UP MICHELLE`S

Quote:
Originally posted by annalyzer [*]

Also at your link: "A former federal prosecutor says that newly released search warrants in the 2006 murder case of Michelle Young show investigators seem to be building a case around her husband, Jason Young.

"Reading between the lines of the search warrant, he's their primary suspect," Kieran Shanahan said Tuesday." [/*]

Richard Ricci was LE's primary suspect in the kidnapping of Elizabeth Smart. The police were wrong.

Richard Jewell was the police and FBI's primary suspect in the Atlanta park bombing. The FBI and police were wrong.

I have no doubt there are hundreds, if not thousands, of other cases where police were wrong about who their primary suspect's were.
  #24  
Old 08-30-2008, 09:23 PM
HI_CYCLE
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by tiny paw-prints [*]

You might want to be more focused on the evidence in this case.

Has the video clip from Hampton Inn depicting Jason checking in wearing a light-colored shirt and 1 hr later his leaving with a dark shirt--been pulled from the public's view yet? [/*]
Why would it need to be removed.Nothing wrong with showing it, unless they forgot to confiscate the luggage.
  #25  
Old 08-30-2008, 09:23 PM
tiny paw-prints tiny paw-prints is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: southern california
Posts: 5,629
Quote:
Originally posted by shack [*]

Why would anyone want to register over there and give them access to your isp number? I may not be a genius but I'm smarter than that. [/*]
I reckon some ppl might have good reasons to hide?
  #26  
Old 08-30-2008, 09:25 PM
bookie bookie is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,385
Quote:
Originally posted by HI_CYCLE [*]Why would it need to be removed.Nothing wrong with showing it, unless they forgot to confiscate the luggage. [/*]
If Jason isn't seen leaving the hotel or propping the door open with a rock that video is evidence of nothing.
  #27  
Old 08-30-2008, 09:27 PM
tiny paw-prints tiny paw-prints is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: southern california
Posts: 5,629
Quote:
Originally posted by bookie [*]


Richard Ricci was LE's primary suspect in the kidnapping of Elizabeth Smart. The police were wrong.

Richard Jewell was the police and FBI's primary suspect in the Atlanta park bombing. The FBI and police were wrong.

I have no doubt there are hundreds, if not thousands, of other cases where police were wrong about who their primary suspect's were. [/*]
Michelle Young was not kidnapped. She was murdered in her own home. Can you reference a recent case wherein LE arrested the wrong killer in a murder case?
  #28  
Old 08-30-2008, 09:28 PM
Barbara2 Barbara2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,608
Quote:
Originally posted by bookie [*]

If Jason isn't seen leaving the hotel or propping the door open with a rock that video is evidence of nothing. [/*]
If that is all they have, I would agree. If it is put together with other evidence that links him to the crime, it would be evidence. The video proves that he left his room but his key card was not used to regain entry.
  #29  
Old 08-30-2008, 09:28 PM
HI_CYCLE
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by tiny paw-prints [*]

"Reading between the lines...."

IIRC, that's kinda what Sheriff Harrison suggested when he commented upon the "relationship" between MM and Jason?

As well as "I wonder what the little girl saw" ? IMO [/*]
Yes reading between the lines is special, you get to read what you want to see.
  #30  
Old 08-30-2008, 09:32 PM
tiny paw-prints tiny paw-prints is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: southern california
Posts: 5,629
Quote:
Originally posted by HI_CYCLE [*]
Yes reading between the lines is special, you get to read what you want to see. [/*]
That must be why you and others always request a link!

  #31  
Old 08-30-2008, 09:34 PM
bookie bookie is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,385
Quote:
Originally posted by Barbara2 [*]

If that is all they have, I would agree. If it is put together with other evidence that links him to the crime, it would be evidence. The video proves that he left his room but his key card was not used to regain entry. [/*]

To date there is no other evidence linking him to the murder. His dna on the wall of his own bedroom doesn't prove he killed his wife. The lab can't even say it's his dna on the jewelry box. A bloody shoe impression 2 sizes smaller than what he wears was found in the bedroom. And if any of the jurors have ever propped a hotel room open for any reason then there is reasonable doubt all over the key card not being used again especially if the stairs are near that exit.
  #32  
Old 08-30-2008, 09:36 PM
HI_CYCLE
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by Barbara2 [*]

If that is all they have, I would agree. If it is put together with other evidence that links him to the crime, it would be evidence. The video proves that he left his room but his key card was not used to regain entry. [/*]
The rock was found the next day by housekeeper. How many guest do you suppose left through that door checking out before housekeeping found the rock?
  #33  
Old 08-30-2008, 09:40 PM
tiny paw-prints tiny paw-prints is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: southern california
Posts: 5,629
Quote:
Originally posted by HI_CYCLE [*]The rock was found the next day by housekeeper. How many guest do you suppose left through that door checking out before housekeeping found the rock? [/*]
"...found the next day..."

At about 12:16am?

A few minutes after Jason checked out?

(try to read between the lines)
  #34  
Old 08-30-2008, 09:40 PM
Barbara2 Barbara2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,608
Quote:
Originally posted by HI_CYCLE [*]The rock was found the next day by housekeeper. How many guest do you suppose left through that door checking out before housekeeping found the rock? [/*]
I have no idea. I don't know that Jason put that rock there. It is a possibility. I do know that I have never been in a hotel where I have come across a rock propping open an outside door. Maybe just another one of those *coincidences*.
  #35  
Old 08-30-2008, 09:42 PM
bookie bookie is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,385
Quote:
Originally posted by HI_CYCLE [*]The rock was found the next day by housekeeper. How many guest do you suppose left through that door checking out before housekeeping found the rock? [/*]

If that's true that makes me think more than ever that an employee propped it open. The hotel I worked in (I left 3 years ago) had lights on a panel that lit up when an exit door remained open for more than a minute or 2. It was a security feature and if the light was on someone had to check the door. So either an employee propped it open or they weren't doing their job.
  #36  
Old 08-30-2008, 09:44 PM
bookie bookie is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,385
Quote:
Originally posted by Barbara2 [*]

I have no idea. I don't know that Jason put that rock there. It is a possibility. I do know that I have never been in a hotel where I have come across a rock propping open an outside door. Maybe just another one of those *coincidences*. [/*]
I worked in a hotel a few years ago. The night shift clerk propped the door open when she went out to smoke. By doing that she didn't get caught using her card to open the door for unscheduled breaks.
  #37  
Old 08-30-2008, 09:51 PM
HI_CYCLE
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by Barbara2 [*]

I have no idea. I don't know that Jason put that rock there. It is a possibility. I do know that I have never been in a hotel where I have come across a rock propping open an outside door. Maybe just another one of those *coincidences*. [/*]
I don`t think LE has any idea who put it there.That makes the rock moot as for as evidence.Heck, there may be video of the person placing it in the door. LE does NOT have to give that information out.
  #38  
Old 08-30-2008, 09:52 PM
forpsystudent
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by HI_CYCLE [*]Why would it need to be removed.Nothing wrong with showing it, unless they forgot to confiscate the luggage. [/*]
Ever hear of inductive logic? JMO
  #39  
Old 08-30-2008, 09:56 PM
Barbara2 Barbara2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,608
Quote:
Originally posted by HI_CYCLE [*]
I don`t think LE has any idea who put it there.That makes the rock moot as for as evidence.Heck, there may be video of the person placing it in the door. LE does NOT have to give that information out. [/*]
They could have evidence that Jason put the rock there. That still is not evidence that he killed his wife.
  #40  
Old 08-30-2008, 09:58 PM
bookie bookie is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,385
Quote:
Originally posted by Barbara2 [*]

They could have evidence that Jason put the rock there. That still is not evidence that he killed his wife. [/*]
If they had evidence he propped the door open I think it would have been in the s/w application. It would have been a guarateed approval.
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All content Copyright Courtroom Television Network, LLC., All Rights Reserved.