Tues April 15 Daily Discussion

[SavannahStar]

Good morning, everyone! Time for a new day, a new thread.

Hope y'all got your taxes in!

[crymeariver2006]

http://www.jdnews.com/news/laurean_5...ty_mexico.html


Extradition Procedure Underway For Laurean

....had his first appearance in front of a judge in Mexico over the weekend, said Capt. Rick Sutherland of the Onslow County Sheriff's Department.

The judge recommended extradition, Sutherland said, adding there are steps to be taken and "we do not know what (Laurean) will want to do."

Laurean has representation in Mexico, said Jacksonville lawyer Wally Paramore, who has been appointed as Laurean's attorney by the state's Capital Defender's Office.

[cuppajoe]

Morning - taxes in. Still reading back from yesterday. Do we know if he waived estradiction?

[cuppajoe]

Sorry that should be extradition.

[CANDYKISSES]

Good morning.

Here we go cryme. I wonder what kind of lawyer he has in Mexico and if Parramore will be talking to him today?

I believe he will be back here in short order, but not before the military puts their information in on what charges they may or may not be seeking to bring him to trial on.

JMO tho.

[martha]

Thanks crym for the inf on the due date sounds right to me. hope we hear when he will be brought back to us.

[crymeariver2006]

Originally posted by CANDYKISSES [*]Good morning.

Here we go cryme. I wonder what kind of lawyer he has in Mexico and if Parramore will be talking to him today?

I believe he will be back here in short order, but not before the military puts their information in on what charges they may or may not be seeking to bring him to trial on.

JMO tho. [/*]

I think Paramore wants to talk with the Mexican attorney ASAP. And yes, the MC has to offer up their charges before the extradition is set in stone so we should be hearing shortly what, if any, charges they are persuing.

Cesar, as of now, still has the right to fight extradition.

(IMO, I don't think he will....but that's just a guess).

[martha]

Originally posted by SavannahStar [*]Good morning, everyone! Time for a new day, a new thread.

Hope y'all got your taxes in! [/*]

Hi everyone my tax man is slow had it to him for 2 months hope it is ready today don;t want to be taken to jail will they let me have a computer in jail? lol

[CANDYKISSES]

Originally posted by martha [*]Thanks crym for the inf on the due date sounds right to me. hope we hear when he will be brought back to us. [/*]

Good morning martha, I think those documents are very confusing from the AMW site, they seem to have a more complete set of incident reports and search warrants.

You have a narrative with a January due date, a confirmation of bipolar and a confirmation of AWOL.

Then in the next page you have confirmation NONE OF THAT IS CORRECT.

Can you imagine???

JMO.

Hope you are feeling better.

I think Cesar is coming to NC sooner rather than later.

[crymeariver2006]

Originally posted by martha [*] Hi everyone my tax man is slow had it to him for 2 months hope it is ready today don;t want to be taken to jail will they let me have a computer in jail? lol [/*]

We must have the same guy! Not to worry, ours always has an extension ready just in case.

[CANDYKISSES]

Originally posted by crymeariver2006 [*]

I think Paramore wants to talk with the Mexican attorney ASAP. And yes, the MC has to offer up their charges before the extradition is set in stone so we should be hearing shortly what, if any, charges they are persuing.

Cesar, as of now, still has the right to fight extradition.

(IMO, I don't think he will....but that's just a guess). [/*]

I wonder when the USMC will be putting their charges together? From my POV, I would think it is contingent on that if we believe DA Hudson has already put his together and addressed the death penalty being off the table. I tend to believe he had that in check, but he did tell Lindell Kay it's possible other charges could be added on.

Do you know if he has that option after extradition if they are lesser crimes? Just curious about what the treaty really does include.

JMO tho.

[martha]

I think he is hating to tell me how much i owe lol

[crymeariver2006]

I don't know about that.

I do know that I have written CW to merge these two threads. LOL, I can't keep up with one, much less two!

[CANDYKISSES]

I guess this could be the I hate doing taxes thread for the day.

I can put a bunch of @#$%#@#$@#$%#$#@@$% on this one...cuz I hate it.

Back from my sleep study.Going over last nights posts.
I noticed discussion about her due date.The person she went to boot camp with who ran into her in november said Maria was 8 months prego at that time.Was this somethign Maria beleived.And with her mom due to arive shortly for the birth of the baby(dec.IIRC) and the dates being changed by military? I am confused.someone help me out here!

Also on the DNA when my son showed me his military ID there is a square in it (silver looking).He told me that contained his DNA.IMO all the marines would carry the same ID cards right?

I am also confused about the JDN reporter indicating maybe the baby belonged to someone else (senior officer) yet she was beleived to be carrying on a relationship with cesar? How does all this come into play I am completely lost! Are they indicating she used Cesars name as being the father out of fear of it really belonging to a senior officer who may be influential or very high ranking? somebody please straighten me out.

[SavannahStar]

Originally posted by crymeariver2006 [*]I don't know about that.

I do know that I have written CW to merge these two threads. LOL, I can't keep up with one, much less two! [/*]

Thank you, cryme. I always hesitate to start the morning thread thinking someone else will do it at the exact same time.....sure enough....

[martha]

Originally posted by crymeariver2006 [*]I don't know about that.

I do know that I have written CW to merge these two threads. LOL, I can't keep up with one, much less two! [/*]

thaks for doing that i can't keep up anyway. i try but i am going to have to be out so hope both or put togeather.

[martha]

maybe this is why they need new dna maybe the baby is not cl if it is someone highter up boy they may be in trouble if they find out who it is. just guessing

[martha]

Originally posted by CANDYKISSES [*]I guess this could be the I hate doing taxes thread for the day.

I can put a bunch of @#$%#@#$@#$%#$#@@$% on this one...cuz I hate it. [/*]

yep CK I am with you on this.

UPDATE off the cuff has added a questions and answers section to their site for Capt. Sutherland to answer as he pleases!

http://onslowcrime.encblogs.com/?p=60

[henry]

see what happens when i've got other things to do! also lkay has a new site up if not posted on the "other" thread:

http://onslowcrime.encblogs.com/

[caejde]

Originally posted by martha [*]maybe this is why they need new dna maybe the baby is not cl if it is someone highter up boy they may be in trouble if they find out who it is. just guessing [/*]

I doubt they would test anyone else. They dont' know who to test. And if it is negative, always that possibility the person isn't even in the military.

Lord I am going to get banned again!!!!
I accidently clicked new thread when trying to post this (I AM NEW!)
UPDATE off the cuff has added a questions and answers section to their site for Capt. Sutherland to answer as he pleases!

http://onslowcrime.encblogs.com/?p=60

[donna]

Originally posted by martha [*] Hi everyone my tax man is slow had it to him for 2 months hope it is ready today don;t want to be taken to jail will they let me have a computer in jail? lol [/*]

... Good morning, everyone!

Martha, I mailed my taxes in last night! LOL, I do not think they will let you have a computer in jail, but I promise to write you a letter every day!

Been gone, so I have to go finish reading yesterday's thread!
BBL.

[henry]

hah! you beat me to it - oh, good morning! hope this willl be a place, as he says, for serious and inquiring minds . . . will we see your questions over there as well?

[crymeariver2006]

Originally posted by martha [*]maybe this is why they need new dna maybe the baby is not cl if it is someone highter up boy they may be in trouble if they find out who it is. just guessing [/*]

I don't think that will turn out to be the case, Martha.

Originally posted by henry [*]hah! you beat me to it - oh, good morning! hope this willl be a place, as he says, for serious and inquiring minds . . . will we see your questions over there as well? [/*]

YEP I am KDB The fact that that table was sold around the time of the murder and THEY didnt want anyone to come to the house to look at it implicates Maria knew something IMO afterall Marines are definitly trained to defend themself.Why would they worry about a young girl/woman coming to look at a table Christina advertised? IMO

[henry]

Originally posted by Coldwater [*]

Be sure you keep your questions and answers over there, unless you get the posters permission the only thing you can post here is the link. All posts quoted on here, even partial, w/o the author's permission will be deleted and cause for banning as it is against copyright and rules. [/*]

thank you for the reminder and thank you for your patience!

Originally posted by Kim [*]

I am also confused about the JDN reporter indicating maybe the baby belonged to someone else (senior officer) yet she was beleived to be carrying on a relationship with cesar? How does all this come into play I am completely lost! Are they indicating she used Cesars name as being the father out of fear of it really belonging to a senior officer who may be influential or very high ranking? somebody please straighten me out. [/*]

Kim, the JDN reporter didn't indicate anything in particular about the baby's paternity or about the words "senior officer" -- he said to look closely at the incident report as there is something there that was generally dismissed at the time, but that may turn out to be very important.

Everything said since then about the paternity, senior officer, etc has been posters (at the Off the Cuff site and here) speculating as to what it was in the incident report that he was hinting at.
Lindell Kay, the reporter, said to look for something... but he didn't give any hint at all as to what. The rest is all speculation as to what he meant.

Originally posted by Charlotte [*]

Kim, the JDN reporter didn't indicate anything in particular about the baby's paternity or about the words "senior officer" -- he said to look closely at the incident report as there is something there that was generally dismissed at the time, but that may turn out to be very important.

Everything said since then about the paternity, senior officer, etc has been posters (at the Off the Cuff site and here) speculating as to what it was in the incident report that he was hinting at.
Lindell Kay, the reporter, said to look for something... but he didn't give any hint at all as to what. The rest is all speculation as to what he meant. [/*]

Hopefully the speculation is far off.

Good morning everyone! Hubby's birthday today. The poor guy is a tax baby! LOL

Welp I am out of here.I didnt get any sleep during my sleep study.
When I come back I hope to see all of our questions answered I have already started to dream huh!

Is it just me, or has the link to the court documents for this case at the AMW site been disabled??

If it has, I wonder why?

ETA http://www.amw.com/pdf/lauterbachPDF.pdf

http://www.amw.com/fugitives/case.cfm?id=52333

Originally posted by Charlotte [*]Is it just me, or has the link to the court documents for this case at the AMW site been disabled??

If it has, I wonder why?

ETA http://www.amw.com/pdf/lauterbachPDF.pdf

http://www.amw.com/fugitives/case.cfm?id=52333 [/*]

Interesting. Maybe the link on their side is just messed up. That's what it looks like to me. The link is pointed to an incorrect location on their server.

[martha]

Originally posted by donna [*]

... Good morning, everyone!

Martha, I mailed my taxes in last night! LOL, I do not think they will let you have a computer in jail, but I promise to write you a letter every day!

Been gone, so I have to go finish reading yesterday's thread!
BBL. [/*]

Thanks Donna you a doll. i am so far behind i will never catch up so I just try to get in on all the new inf/

[strick10]

Originally posted by Charlotte [*]

Kim, the JDN reporter didn't indicate anything in particular about the baby's paternity or about the words "senior officer" -- he said to look closely at the incident report as there is something there that was generally dismissed at the time, but that may turn out to be very important.

Everything said since then about the paternity, senior officer, etc has been posters (at the Off the Cuff site and here) speculating as to what it was in the incident report that he was hinting at.
Lindell Kay, the reporter, said to look for something... but he didn't give any hint at all as to what. The rest is all speculation as to what he meant. [/*]

Yup nothing but speculation.....

[nuttintodo]

I am bringing this over from last night discussion:

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by mini-me [*]Wasn't there a garden shed or some thing like that on the property.[/*]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

At the Laurean's, yes I do believe there is.

At DD's I don't know because when I rode by I couldn't see into his backyard.

And unless I'm sorely mistakened, anytime a SW is being obtained to search a house and/or property, they apply to search any and all buildings/structures along with the land around them.

jmoo

Originally posted by AmyO [*]
Interesting. Maybe the link on their side is just messed up. That's what it looks like to me. The link is pointed to an incorrect location on their server. [/*]

Ah, it looks like the whole AMW site is messed up.

It's either undergoing some problems, or is in the midst of upgrading or something. Many of the pics they had up are disabled too, but it's not just on CL's section of the site, it's on every suspect's. Must be something at their end. (Hope they get it fixed soon.)

Originally posted by CANDYKISSES [*]

I wonder when the USMC will be putting their charges together? From my POV, I would think it is contingent on that if we believe DA Hudson has already put his together and addressed the death penalty being off the table. I tend to believe he had that in check, but he did tell Lindell Kay it's possible other charges could be added on.

Do you know if he has that option after extradition if they are lesser crimes? Just curious about what the treaty really does include.

JMO tho. [/*]

Article 17. RULE OF SPECIALITY
1. A person extradited under the present Treaty shall not be detained, tried or
punished in the territory of the requesting Party for an offense other than that for
which extradition has been granted nor be extradited by that Party to a third State
http://untreaty.un.org/unts/60001_12...4/00009695.pdf

[daniel green]

Originally posted by SavannahStar [*]Good morning, everyone! Time for a new day, a new thread.

Hope y'all got your taxes in! [/*]

Good morning, SS.

Tax day. Sigh.