8/30 thru 11/9 (Jury selection George Thomas' trial)

[wnb]

I just did a Google search for Tru TV. It seems In Sessions will still be on and will be based in Atlanta instead of New York starting the week after next. Vinnie Politan will return as an anchor along with several new anchors.

[bhardy1956]

Ok, I am new to this thread, but did a little research on this horrific crime. My question is why have they had separate trials for these monsters? Why didn't they all have just one trial and get it over with?

I am so sad, that humans can act this way! Wait! They aren't humans!

[Lyndawitha"Y]

Originally Posted by bhardy1956

Ok, I am new to this thread, but did a little research on this horrific crime. My question is why have they had separate trials for these monsters? Why didn't they all have just one trial and get it over with?

I am so sad, that humans can act this way! Wait! They aren't humans!

Hi bhardy..That point you just made also irked us too..as having these 4 hour separate trials we know has to be torture to the Christians and the Newsoms..however they were severed way back when as the finger pointing started from the giddy up..

Having watched 2 of the four so far..I think jurors could have figured it out, however, the judicial system must allow each defendent's defense team to run their cases according to their particular client's culpibilities.
Each defense team..suggest the other guy did it..or planned it or controlled it or heck..their client wasnt even there...LOL So it goes..

Anyway, so far so good...

Hope to see ya on the threads when the next trial gets started!!

LMS

[in4infor]

Ok I have not been here lately, but I did find this and wanted to share it.
http://sprocket-trials.blogspot.com/

http://www.smashsouthsports.org/foru...30&postcount=1

[Hedda Lettis]

in4infor, thank you so much for the link to the juror's statement. I am in awe of the jurors. And thankful that I wasn't on that jury. They did good....

[aubrey04]

Originally Posted by in4infor

Ok I have not been here lately, but I did find this and wanted to share it.
http://sprocket-trials.blogspot.com/

http://www.smashsouthsports.org/foru...30&postcount=1

Thanks for the links.

That juror has some great comments. It seems like I keep learning new factoids about this case as I go along.. He mentioned that Lemaricus called Daphne from Chris' phone.. I guess I missed that testimony. Very small detail but just another nail in his coffin, which I had missed.

[cog1]

Originally Posted by aubrey04

Thanks for the links.

That juror has some great comments. It seems like I keep learning new factoids about this case as I go along.. He mentioned that Lemaricus called Daphne from Chris' phone.. I guess I missed that testimony. Very small detail but just another nail in his coffin, which I had missed.

Hi Aubrey,

What is standing out to me and I'm not finished reading that post but this. The women jurors could not find that LD was responsible for the crime of raping Chris.

What bothers we about that is will we see more women jurors next time and will they do the same?

AMOO Oh, good morning everyone!!

[aubrey04]

Originally Posted by cog1

Hi Aubrey,

What is standing out to me and I'm not finished reading that post but this. The women jurors could not find that LD was responsible for the crime of raping Chris.

What bothers we about that is will we see more women jurors next time and will they do the same?

AMOO Oh, good morning everyone!!

Yes, I read that, cog1. I really didn't understand their stance, at least how it was explained from the juror/writer of that post.

[Lyndawitha"Y]

Originally Posted by cog1

Hi Aubrey,

What is standing out to me and I'm not finished reading that post but this. The women jurors could not find that LD was responsible for the crime of raping Chris.

What bothers we about that is will we see more women jurors next time and will they do the same?

AMOO Oh, good morning everyone!!

Mornin cog..I read that post too..and got the impression that the whole jury panel believed LC was guilty..however when they had to go down that long list of each and every charge, they stepped back and looked at the evidence to see if proved beyong reasonable doubt..Sometimes the CSI affect makes some juror's need forensic proof of who did eactly what..and if they dont see it, they compromise abit on that particular charge....It must have been overwhelming for all of them!!

If their only question was "Did LC/LD take part in the crime as a whole?" and not required to decide on each and every element of that crme..they would have been back in that courtroom with a verdict in 2 minutes..Guilty...As it is, too fast verdicts are sometimes "Appellable" if appellate court deems jury misconduct..ala No deliberation claim by defense...it becomes a mistrial..

I dont know, but sometimes even on this board during some trials, there are some posters who say things similar..like I think they did it, but dont think it has been proven...BYRD

LMS