In Session Message Boards  

Go Back   In Session Message Boards > FLDS Trials

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #241  
Old 11-17-2009, 06:18 PM
walton walton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by texski View Post
i am in love with the texas bluesman and i dont even know who or what he/she is.
go there now, click on some songs for raymond jessup. great songs, and he has the links for us to play them and gloat. my favorite was in the jailhouse now. but there are more.
I really love bluesman as well texski. I enjoyed all the songs. I've got the movie dvd O Brother where art thou. Like the music and enjoyed the movie.

Wonder what Raymond is singing?
Reply With Quote
  #242  
Old 11-17-2009, 06:41 PM
Roux Roux is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by walton View Post
I really love bluesman as well texski. I enjoyed all the songs. I've got the movie dvd O Brother where art thou. Like the music and enjoyed the movie.

Wonder what Raymond is singing?
In honor of Johnny Mercer, I suggest Accentuate the Positive cuz with the sentence Tony Alamo received, Raymond should be greatful for 10 years.
Reply With Quote
  #243  
Old 11-18-2009, 12:32 AM
texski texski is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 376
i think we are all getting a little giddy with happiness after the guilty verdict. so, we are entitled.
Reply With Quote
  #244  
Old 11-19-2009, 12:05 AM
walton walton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,230
http://myeldorado.net/

Randy wrote an awesome editorial.
Reply With Quote
  #245  
Old 11-19-2009, 12:08 AM
walton walton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roux View Post
In honor of Johnny Mercer, I suggest Accentuate the Positive cuz with the sentence Tony Alamo received, Raymond should be greatful for 10 years.
There was a special on tv about Johnny Mercer today. I thought of you Roux.

Sakes alive there are still a few of us with dang good taste.
Reply With Quote
  #246  
Old 11-19-2009, 11:55 AM
Roux Roux is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by walton View Post
There was a special on tv about Johnny Mercer today. I thought of you Roux.

Sakes alive there are still a few of us with dang good taste.
I recently watched a PBS program about him, that's why it was fresh in my mind. He was genius, and I love Hoagy Carmichael too.
Reply With Quote
  #247  
Old 11-20-2009, 03:23 AM
Casspian Casspian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 565
Think they'll get away with this? (I didn't see this posted, so hope I am not duplicating)

Quote:
KINGMAN - The attorneys for Warren Steed Jeffs is asking a Mohave County Superior Court judge to set another court hearing to argue whether the prosecutor's witnesses are experts in religious practices.

Jeffs' attorney, Mike Piccarreta, is asking Judge Steven Conn to set a hearing to argue whether Carolyn Jessop, Richard Holm and Rebecca Musser are experts on the religious practices of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Jeffs is considered a prophet by the polygamist church in Colorado City, Ariz., and Hildale, Utah.
http://www.mohavedailynews.com/artic...cal/local6.txt
Reply With Quote
  #248  
Old 11-20-2009, 08:40 AM
juliekan juliekan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,862
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casspian View Post
Think they'll get away with this? (I didn't see this posted, so hope I am not duplicating)



http://www.mohavedailynews.com/artic...cal/local6.txt
http://fldslegal.blogspot.com/2009/1...re-expert.html

Here's one attorney's take on the situation:

"However, his argument that they aren't "experts" falls flat. Arizona's rule is similar to Texas, you must show..."(see more at site)

"The bottom line is that all three listed individuals meet the requirements under Rule 702 to be experts. The judge may not let all of them testify (could be viewed as cumulative evidence.) The judge may place some limits on what they can say (some evidence could be viewed as too prejudicial or maybe not relevant.) However, there will be at least one FLDS "expert" who testifies at the Warren Jeffs trial."

Let's hope Ron is correct. I mean, we are dealing with Judge Conn here
Reply With Quote
  #249  
Old 11-20-2009, 09:48 AM
Roux Roux is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by juliekan View Post
http://fldslegal.blogspot.com/2009/1...re-expert.html

Here's one attorney's take on the situation:

"However, his argument that they aren't "experts" falls flat. Arizona's rule is similar to Texas, you must show..."(see more at site)

"The bottom line is that all three listed individuals meet the requirements under Rule 702 to be experts. The judge may not let all of them testify (could be viewed as cumulative evidence.) The judge may place some limits on what they can say (some evidence could be viewed as too prejudicial or maybe not relevant.) However, there will be at least one FLDS "expert" who testifies at the Warren Jeffs trial."

Let's hope Ron is correct. I mean, we are dealing with Judge Conn here
I'd like to see an "expert" testify --- an expert on cults.
Reply With Quote
  #250  
Old 11-20-2009, 10:59 AM
walton walton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,230
Julie I'd like to see that as well.

Who is the expert that Ron is talking about? How does he know?

Last edited by walton; 11-20-2009 at 11:00 AM. Reason: more questions
Reply With Quote
  #251  
Old 11-20-2009, 03:26 PM
juliekan juliekan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,862
Quote:
Originally Posted by walton View Post
Julie I'd like to see that as well.

Who is the expert that Ron is talking about? How does he know?
I think Ron's point is that at least one of the three he mentioned will end up being allowed to testify. Here's his response to some comments at his site:

Ron in Houston said...

When you can't call any of your own experts then you get limited to trying to attack the other side's experts.

That's clearly what is going on here.

(I guess another throw it and see if it sticks FLDS legal ploy? juliekan's opinion)

and

Yes, it's clear these folks(Holms, Musser, Jessop, I assume he means) have axes to grind. However, that does not disqualify them. Any bogotry or lying would be used for cross examination. However, you can't just say "liar, liar, pants on fire." Before you can cross examine someone about alleged lies, you must first show that they are testifying untruthfully. Somehow, I don't think Warren's attorneys will be able to do that.
Reply With Quote
  #252  
Old 11-20-2009, 03:44 PM
walton walton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,230
It will be very interesting. Even if the FLDS were to put a current member on the stand under oath they very well couldn't deny some of the things being said.

Check this out: http://166.70.44.68/blogs/plurallife/

Wall v. UEP Trust, Trust v. Steed et al, Steed v. Wall



This will keep everyone busy for a very long time.
Reply With Quote
  #253  
Old 11-20-2009, 03:50 PM
walton walton is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,230
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/7...ms-to-air.html

On the second anniversary of FLDS leader Warren Jeffs being sentenced to prison, the Documentary Channel is airing a pair of programs about members of the Fundamentalist LDS Church.

(Neither is new, but neither has been seen in wide release.)

"Damned to Heaven" (Friday, 8 and 10 p.m.) is a 2007 documentary that's full of interviews with former members of the church, who have a variety of heartbreaking things to say.

"Banished: The Lost Boys of Polygamy" — directed by former KSL reporter Stacey Butler — follows at 7:45 p.m. and 10:45 p.m. It is, as you might expect, a look at the lives of the teenage boys and young men who were tossed out of the FLDS Church.

http://sling.com/

http://www.sling.com/network/189/The...entary-Channel)

Just type the name of the documentary you wish to watch.

Polygamy is rarely ever about consenting adults.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All content Copyright Courtroom Television Network, LLC., All Rights Reserved.