Katheryn was to pdf this...but I don't think were going to see it.
Do you know or think this happened in the Gee case?
Did one of the brothers have a severe injury? Since you are from Beason originally, have you talked to anyone with regards to the article in the paper that was not on line? Don't mean to bombard you with question---but I am aren't I.I can see the reason for the LE to keep quite, but this is a little ridiculus when it comes to the paper whose suppose to be providing info. Sort of smells. They only wanted to sell papers, not keep the people informed. Hope the Pantagraph or SJR pick up on that article. It amazes me that not that many people have commented on the warrent/transparency issue. The PG ran an article and there were no comments at all the last time I looked. Of course that is a different county. The comment your friend wrote in the LC was excellent and very informative. I"m surprised and sorry I missed it the first time around. Thank you for bringing it to our attention.
I can't help but wonder if there is some reference to knives, stabbing, slitting throats, that sort of thing. That was the Schneider case. I did hear rumors to that effect but can only say they were just hearsay. However, the reference to the Schneider murders is a red flag to me. The Sheriff didn't mention the Fry murders and they were shot, so hmmmm. No I haven't talked to anyone lately up that way. Just too busy in my own life. I try to read the Pantagraph and Courier once in a while as well as the SJ-R and Decatur Herald. Can't keep up with all of it so I rely on you all here! Yes, the comment my friend wrote is very informative and I trust her and her judgment. I do have respect for LE, however, I can't help but wonder why the warrants are all sealed? Seems to go back many years, perhaps as far back as 1976 where I don't think we have all of the answers.
__________________
“One hundred years from now, it will not matter what kind of car I drove or what kind of clothes I wore. All that will matter is that I made a difference in the life of a child.” ~ Forrest Witcraff
I can see the reason for the LE to keep quite, but this is a little ridiculus when it comes to the paper whose suppose to be providing info. Sort of smells. They only wanted to sell papers, not keep the people informed. Hope the Pantagraph or SJR pick up on that article. It amazes me that not that many people have commented on the warrent/transparency issue. The PG ran an article and there were no comments at all the last time I looked. Of course that is a different county. The comment your friend wrote in the LC was excellent and very informative. I"m surprised and sorry I missed it the first time around. Thank you for bringing it to our attention.
Threaded Mode