Jackson Brothers To Film Reality Show About Michael's Death

[February]

http://wonderwall.msn.com/music/michael-jackson-s-brothers-film-reality-show-about-his-death-1520139.story#m=6Secb4T5CuG

God Bless Them. I Hope they can get through this.

[forensicpsy~]

http://wonderwall.msn.com/music/michael-jackson-s-brothers-film-reality-show-about-his-death-1520139.story#m=6Secb4T5CuG

God Bless Them. I Hope they can get through this.

Doesn't this taint the jury pool? :rolleyes:

[February]

Hi forensic

Well, there is also a movie being released. I heard tickets go on sale 9/27.

Personally, I think any jury would see what Dr. Murray was up to, movie or not.

[Xenam]

Doesn't this taint the jury pool? :rolleyes:

Hi FS :)

The reality show was already in the works before MJ's death and they had already done the pilot. They actually wanted MJ to appear in it and IIRC MJ wanted nothing to do with it. If I am understanding correctly -- they are just going to include now how the Jackson's were affected by his death. JMO

Earlier this year (09) U.S. network A&E filmed Jermaine, Jackie, Tito, Marlon and Randy Jackson recording a new album for a documentary that was scheduled to be aired in 2010.

The brothers planned to recruit their superstar sibling to film a reunion performance for the one-hour pilot but they didn't manage to persuade him to participate before his untimely death in June (09).

But producers are going forward with the show, which will air in September (09), and reportedly plan to include a reference to Michael's death at the end of the programme.

Danny O'Donovan, who managed the Jackson brothers since they left Motown in the late 1970s, negotiated the deal with A&E bosses, who hope to air the footage as a series in half-hour or hour-long sessions.

http://www.contactmusic.com/news.nsf/story/jackson-reality-show-heading-to-tv_1113457

[daniel green]

It's just so unseemly.

[ABC]

It's just so unseemly.
Yes, it is. They have to support their families too. I did not think the Jackson 5 was that good, even in their hay day.

[Eagleeye]

Doesn't this taint the jury pool? :rolleyes:

I doubt it seriously. First. there hasn't been an arrest yet. Second, if there is, there might be a plea deal. Last but not least, there are approximately ten million people in LA County. Not all of them care, don't know MJ or give a rat's behind about him. The assumption that anyone charged with someting in this case (if it is a case) cannot get a fair trial because of a tainted jury is ludicrous. And BTW, it won't be MJ on trial again.

ETA: So far I don't know if there is a Statute that says that one can be prosecuted for stupid medical practice. Willful neglect rising to involuntary manslaughter, of course. This is not going to be a walk in the park for the LA District Attorneys Office.

[retiredcop]

Yes, it is. They have to support their families too. I did not think the Jackson 5 was that good, even in their hay day.

I didn't think they were either. A reality show on their brother's death. There is nothing they won't do to make a buck.

in my opinion

[daniel green]

Yes, it is. They have to support their families too. I did not think the Jackson 5 was that good, even in their hay day.

Hello, friend! So good to see you!

This might be the first time I can think of people LITERALLY making money off their deceased kin.

[ABC]

Hello, friend! So good to see you!

This might be the first time I can think of people LITERALLY making money off their deceased kin.

You too, Daniel. Good to see you, too. So sad for all concerned.

[Pretty Leaf]

'The Brother's" have tried to make money on the back of Micheal dead or alive.

[Emerald]

The more I read about the Jackson Family and what they will do to make a $$$ it get more and more disgusting.

Paris, Prince and Blanket are right in the middle of this crap. There is no way they can be shielded. I really wish they could be in a different environment.

JMO

[forensicpsy~]

I doubt it seriously. First. there hasn't been an arrest yet. Second, if there is, there might be a plea deal. Last but not least, there are approximately ten million people in LA County. Not all of them care, don't know MJ or give a rat's behind about him. The assumption that anyone charged with someting in this case (if it is a case) cannot get a fair trial because of a tainted jury is ludicrous. And BTW, it won't be MJ on trial again.

ETA: So far I don't know if there is a Statute that says that one can be prosecuted for stupid medical practice. Willful neglect rising to involuntary manslaughter, of course. This is not going to be a walk in the park for the LA District Attorneys Office.

I agree.

I guess I should have added "If there is a trial."

imo

[Pretty Leaf]

I do not think he has even been layed to rest yet, has he?

No, the changed date is Sept 3

[February]

The more I read about the Jackson Family and what they will do to make a $$$ it get more and more disgusting.

Paris, Prince and Blanket are right in the middle of this crap. There is no way they can be shielded. I really wish they could be in a different environment.

JMO



The Jacksons are not destitute. They live very well.
They have their own businesses, property and live a quiet, respectful life.
They are a wonderful family who have shunned the spotlight for decades. They loved Michael, their grief was obvious at his memorial.
The family is not trying to make money from his death, they don't need to,

[February]

Wow....just wow.

and a HUGE eyeroll...............


My son rolls his eyes also when he can't make a point.
But I'll send you a smile >>> :biggrin:

[tiptop]

The Jacksons are not destitute. They live very well.
They have their own businesses, property and live a quiet, respectful life.
They are a wonderful family who have shunned the spotlight for decades. They loved Michael, their grief was obvious at his memorial.
The family is not trying to make money from his death, they don't need to,

LOL - yeah, whatever gets you thru the night.

The brothers have forever been living off the prospect of Michael. It's a well know fact he did not want to support them. Yet they continued to want concerts to line their pockets. Tito who? Marlon who? Yeah, that's what I thought. A bunch of nobodies wanting to survive off Michael's profits. Of course JMO.

[February]

LOL - yeah, whatever gets you thru the night.

The brothers have forever been living off the prospect of Michael. It's a well know fact he did not want to support them. Yet they continued to want concerts to line their pockets. Tito who? Marlon who? Yeah, that's what I thought. A bunch of nobodies wanting to survive off Michael's profits. Of course JMO.

What gets me thru the night is truth and respect for a grieving family.
Marlon invested in real estate in So CA decades ago and is quite well off
Jackie is a producer, still sings back up for various recording artists, and Tito just returned from a gig in the Bahamas or Caribbean.
They were also inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame and are
one of Motown's best selling artists.
Besides all that to let you people tell it, Michael has no money. So which story are u sticking to?

Such hatred. What did the Jacksons ever do to you? Or anyone else on this forum for that matter?

[tiptop]

What gets me thru the night is truth and respect for a grieving family.
Marlon invested in real estate in So CA decades ago and is quite well off
Jackie is a producer, still sings back up for various recording artists, and Tito just returned from a gig in the Bahamas or Caribbean.
They were also inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame and are
one of Motown's best selling artists.
Besides all that to let you people tell it, Michael has no money. So which story are u sticking to?

Such hatred. What did the Jacksons ever do to you? Or anyone else on this forum for that matter?


LOL - OK, yeah -the brothers are living comfortably without Michael. They did nothing to me --- did they do anything to you?

Again LOL - Michael has more money than the brothers. Tito opening for Gladys Knight has to be big bucks, right?????? lol. Gladys Who and the Whats???????????????? hahahaha

[February]

LOL - OK, yeah -the brothers are living comfortably without Michael. They did nothing to me --- did they do anything to you?

Again LOL - Michael has more money than the brothers. Tito opening for Gladys Knight has to be big bucks, right?????? lol. Gladys Who and the Whats???????????????? hahahaha


The joke is on you. LOL It's called black music. R&B It has longevity and so does it's stars.
If you think Gladys is not drawing a crowd and selling out venues you really are naive. Or verrrry young. .
What music do you listen to? And please don't say Miley Cyrus.

[tiptop]

The joke is on you. LOL It's called black music. R&B It has longevity and so does it's stars.
If you think Gladys is not drawing a crowd and selling out venues you really are naive. Or verrrry young. .
What music do you listen to? And please don't say Miley Cyrus.

LOL - yeah I'm sure Gladys is drawing crowds wherever she plays. Thats why we hear about her a lot. lol

[Emerald]

Okay, I'll jump in here. Gladys Knight is an icon. Enough said.

IMO, the 'grieving' Family needs to stay out of the courts and pay more attention to burying MJ. I have no doubt Katherine is aching for hte loss of a child. Any Mother would. The rest of the Family is no doubt missing MJ as well.

However, allowing MJ's 3 children to go through days and nights for months with the knowledge their Father is in cold storage is most wicked and cruel. They are not babies, and are well aware of what is going on. Whether anyone wants to believe it or not.

Michael made it very clear who he wanted handling his business affairs. These are men he trusted and are well respected in the entertainment industry.

If the MJ siblings are doing so well, why did Katherine file court documents saying her only income was a paltry SS check? She lives in an 8-bedroom mansion which is constantly filled with live in family and help. Why aren't these well to do MJ sibs chipping in to help keep Katherine afloat?

Like I said, I have no doubt they are grieving for the loss of MJ. But, they've jumped on the money train instead of giving MJ the courtesy of a burial.

IMO

[tiptop]

Okay, I'll jump in here. Gladys Knight is an icon. Enough said.

IMO, the 'grieving' Family needs to stay out of the courts and pay more attention to burying MJ. I have no doubt Katherine is aching for hte loss of a child. Any Mother would. The rest of the Family is no doubt missing MJ as well.

However, allowing MJ's 3 children to go through days and nights for months with the knowledge their Father is in cold storage is most wicked and cruel. They are not babies, and are well aware of what is going on. Whether anyone wants to believe it or not.

Michael made it very clear who he wanted handling his business affairs. These are men he trusted and are well respected in the entertainment industry.

If the MJ siblings are doing so well, why did Katherine file court documents saying her only income was a paltry SS check? She lives in an 8-bedroom mansion which is constantly filled with live in family and help. Why aren't these well to do MJ sibs chipping in to help keep Katherine afloat?

Like I said, I have no doubt they are grieving for the loss of MJ. But, they've jumped on the money train instead of giving MJ the courtesy of a burial.

IMO

I love Gladys, but being an "icon" has little to do with making a living. And Tito certainly isnt helping her. C'mon - has she really fell so low she needs Tito to open for her?

[ScoobyDoo]

Okay, I'll jump in here. Gladys Knight is an icon. Enough said.

IMO, the 'grieving' Family needs to stay out of the courts and pay more attention to burying MJ. I have no doubt Katherine is aching for hte loss of a child. Any Mother would. The rest of the Family is no doubt missing MJ as well.

However, allowing MJ's 3 children to go through days and nights for months with the knowledge their Father is in cold storage is most wicked and cruel. They are not babies, and are well aware of what is going on. Whether anyone wants to believe it or not.
Michael made it very clear who he wanted handling his business affairs. These are men he trusted and are well respected in the entertainment industry.

If the MJ siblings are doing so well, why did Katherine file court documents saying her only income was a paltry SS check? She lives in an 8-bedroom mansion which is constantly filled with live in family and help. Why aren't these well to do MJ sibs chipping in to help keep Katherine afloat?

Like I said, I have no doubt they are grieving for the loss of MJ. But, they've jumped on the money train instead of giving MJ the courtesy of a burial.

IMO


Do you really think it makes a lot of difference to his children, whether he be refrigerated or 6 feet in the ground? They lost their Father, and whatever lies in that coffin is merely a shell of the man that they called Daddy. Maybe its a big deal, or seems odd to the people on the outside, but to his children I think the big deal is their loss, and burying him, or cremating him, or refrigerating him... will never bring their Daddy back. You may not agree with the way the family has dealt with THEIR loss, but thats just it... it is their loss, and not ours, and they should be able to deal with it in their own way, and in their own time.

I think if anyone is so concerned about the well being of his children, the focus shouldnt be his burial arrangements, but rather the constant criticism and maligning of their family, which I have no doubt is more likely to damage those children, rather than which day the remains of their father is put in the ground.

imo...of course.

[February]

Do you really think it makes a lot of difference to his children, whether he be refrigerated or 6 feet in the ground? They lost their Father, and whatever lies in that coffin is merely a shell of the man that they called Daddy. Maybe its a big deal, or seems odd to the people on the outside, but to his children I think the big deal is their loss, and burying him, or cremating him, or refrigerating him... will never bring their Daddy back. You may not agree with the way the family has dealt with THEIR loss, but thats just it... it is their loss, and not ours, and they should be able to deal with it in their own way, and in their own time.

I think if anyone is so concerned about the well being of his children, the focus shouldnt be his burial arrangements, but rather the constant criticism and maligning of their family, which I have no doubt is more likely to damage those children, rather than which day the remains of their father is put in the ground.

imo...of course.

Well stated. But, sometimes people can't hear you because they choose not to. Common sense dictates that Janet loves her mother with a passionn and being amillionaire she has taken care of her mother for years.
I remember reading an article in Ebony magazine many years ago when Michael and Janet were discussing who was going to send 'Mother's Check" .
Katherine lives in an estate and has a lot of hired help.
Who do you think bankrolls the payroll?

[Emerald]

Well stated. But, sometimes people can't hear you because they choose not to. Common sense dictates that Janet loves her mother with a passionn and being amillionaire she has taken care of her mother for years.
I remember reading an article in Ebony magazine many years ago when Michael and Janet were discussing who was going to send 'Mother's Check" .
Katherine lives in an estate and has a lot of hired help.
Who do you think bankrolls the payroll?

Exactly! Now MJ's children are bankrolling the payroll.

We get the same information and come to different conclusions. Unless you have a direct line to the Jacksons. It is not necessary to post as though this is a private message board and other "people" cannot read.

IMO

[February]

Exactly! Now MJ's children are bankrolling the payroll.

We get the same information and come to different conclusions. Unless you have a direct line to the Jacksons. It is not necessary to post as though this is a private message board and other "people" cannot read.

IMO

Reading and comprehending are two different issues. But some people still don't understand nor do they want to know the truth.
It's all about the attacks and the negativity.
Gotta go. Have a good one.


Thank you, Mom and may you rest in peace as well as others who are deceased. Thanks for teaching me to respect those who have lost loved ones and to honor their grieving process.
Love you and Miss you.

[retiredcop]

LOL - yeah, whatever gets you thru the night.

The brothers have forever been living off the prospect of Michael. It's a well know fact he did not want to support them. Yet they continued to want concerts to line their pockets. Tito who? Marlon who? Yeah, that's what I thought. A bunch of nobodies wanting to survive off Michael's profits. Of course JMO.

That's right and they are doing what they can now to get as much as they can get before the novelty wears off. After all the were not in the will. :rolleyes:

in my opinion

[retiredcop]

I wish all of the trust was to the children and the charities. The only money Katherine would get would be for the care of the children and have to show receipts. That's what I wish. Anyway, she may just get disinherited. I think she is very close to that by trying to challenge the executors that MICHAEL JACKSON appointed.

That way all of them would probably be doing the reality show and spliting the money.:laugh:

in my opinion

[Emerald]

I wish all of the trust was to the children and the charities. The only money Katherine would get would be for the care of the children and have to show receipts. That's what I wish. Anyway, she may just get disinherited. I think she is very close to that by trying to challenge the executors that MICHAEL JACKSON appointed.

That way all of them would probably be doing the reality show and spliting the money.:laugh:

in my opinion

JMO



The 40% for the children cannot be touched until they reach the age of majority as stipulated in the Trust

The 40% for Katherine was for the care of the children as well. Whatever is left will revert back to the Michael Jackson Family Trust. In order for that to happen, there would be some sort of accounting to the Trust. IOW, Katherine does not receive an inheritance to be spent solely at her discretion.

That's how I understand the will. The details of the trust have not been published. Most likely never will be.

IMO

[daniel green]

JMO



The 40% for the children cannot be touched until they reach the age of majority as stipulated in the Trust

The 40% for Katherine was for the care of the children as well. Whatever is left will revert back to the Michael Jackson Family Trust. snipped

We do not know this. The details of the trust have never been made public.

[tiptop]

That's right and they are doing what they can now to get as much as they can get before the novelty wears off. After all the were not in the will. :rolleyes:

in my opinion

I'm not saying the brothers were without talent. But unfortunately, compared to Michael and Janet, they paled in comparison.

Michael made it perfectly clear throughout his life (and in his will) he did not want to support them. I feel the brothers would do a concert that included Michael and live off it for as long as they could ---- doing little in between. While Mike worked hard. And I dont blame him one bit for excluding them from his wealth.

[sallemae]

I love Gladys, but being an "icon" has little to do with making a living. And Tito certainly isnt helping her. C'mon - has she really fell so low she needs Tito to open for her?


What's wrong with Tito? Sometimes, it's just about fiends and enjoying music!

[tiptop]

What's wrong with Tito? Sometimes, it's just about fiends and enjoying music!

Well, nothing wrong with Tito. It's just that he fell to the Gladys level. Nothing wrong with that, per se. I love the music Gladys once did. But that is the key. ONCE did. The brothers are history as far as I am concerned. They were never anything without Michael by their side. They were basically lazy and made little money on their own. And thought Michael was their cash cow. And in all fairness, dad Joe instilled that in them. The "one for all" mentality that Michael grew out of when he (Michael) realized he was doing all the work. People came to see him, not the other brothers.

[sallemae]

Well, nothing wrong with Tito. It's just that he fell to the Gladys level. Nothing wrong with that, per se. I love the music Gladys once did. But that is the key. ONCE did. The brothers are history as far as I am concerned. They were never anything without Michael by their side. They were basically lazy and made little money on their own. And thought Michael was their cash cow. And in all fairness, dad Joe instilled that in them. The "one for all" mentality that Michael grew out of when he (Michael) realized he was doing all the work. People came to see him, not the other brothers.

Now what's wrong with Gladys....( fell to the Gladys level) what does this mean?
You know some music has no date to it, you either like it or you don't like it. I listen to music of artist that have passed before my time.

Music is music, no age , no boudaries, no color, music is universal!

[tiptop]

Now what's wrong with Gladys....( fell to the Gladys level) what does this mean?
You know some music has no date to it, you either like it or you don't like it. I listen to music of artist that have passed before my time.

Music is music, no age , no boudaries, no color, music is universal!

True. But who is going to Gladys concerts now? I have a CD or two of hers. But go to a concert? Nope. She's 65 years old. That isnt old per se, but for touring it is in the music business. Face it, she's doing lounges and small clubs. Very few are interested in seeing her live now. And for Tito to open for her. Well, come on.............LOL. Is that the best he can do with all this talent some claim the brothers have?

[Lainey]

Music is music, no age , no boudaries, no color, music is universal!

I agree! I love Gladys Knight...I always have and always will. Just like I love Michaels music. To me it will never be passe. It's their music period...not what they "once did".....it's what they created. No offense but I have a lot of respect for Gladys and Michael, and I'm glad Tito has a job. :thumbup:

[tiptop]

I agree! I love Gladys Knight...I always have and always will. Just like I love Michaels music. To me it will never be passe. It's their music period...not what they "once did".....it's what they created. No offense but I have a lot of respect for Gladys and Michael, and I'm glad Tito has a job. :thumbup:


I agree, but are you going to go see her now in concert? With Tito Jackson as an opening act?

I dont want to see her old like me. I want to remember the music as it affected me back in the day.

[sallemae]

I agree, but are you going to go see her now in concert? With Tito Jackson as an opening act?

I dont want to see her old like me. I want to remember the music as it affected me back in the day.


Music has no eyes, it doesn't care what you look like. You listen and feel it......feel good listening to it. I got youtube playing now and ofcourse it is MJ.

[ABC]

I agree, but are you going to go see her now in concert? With Tito Jackson as an opening act?

I dont want to see her old like me. I want to remember the music as it affected me back in the day.

I saw Gladys in concert week ago at the Orleans and she was terrific. She looks great. All it takes is money and a good stylist and/or plastic surgeon. I am not a Jackson fan and would not know Tito if I tripped over him. I missed the opening act as they are usually bad even for the Stones.:thumbup:

[tiptop]

Music has no eyes, it doesn't care what you look like. You listen and feel it......feel good listening to it. I got youtube playing now and ofcourse it is MJ.

lol - again, I agree, but you didnt answer my question. You going to a Gladys concert anytime soon where Tito is the opening act?

[sallemae]

True. But who is going to Gladys concerts now? I have a CD or two of hers. But go to a concert? Nope. She's 65 years old. That isnt old per se, but for touring it is in the music business. Face it, she's doing lounges and small clubs. Very few are interested in seeing her live now. And for Tito to open for her. Well, come on.............LOL. Is that the best he can do with all this talent some claim the brothers have?


Last time I went to see BB King, he had to sit in a chair on stage all night, but that didn't matter the music was great!!!!!

[tiptop]

I saw Gladys in concert week ago and she was terrific. She looks great. :thumbup:

Interesting. Where did you see her?

[tiptop]

Last time I went to see BB King, he had to sit in a chair on stage all night, but that didn't matter the music was great!!!!!

Well, personally, I dont place B.B. in the same category with Gladys. A few hits versus a lifetime of kick-butt guitar? No comparison in my book. I would visit a hospital to hear B.B. play.

[Lainey]

I really can't afford concert tickerts, but if she comes to my area in a little lounge I would love to go. As for Tito as an opening act.....I wouldn't get all dressed up for any opening act. I go to see the headliner. :thumbsup:

[sallemae]

lol - again, I agree, but you didnt answer my question. You going to a Gladys concert anytime soon where Tito is the opening act?


Yes I would, it's the music I go for.

[daniel green]

Last time I went to see BB King, he had to sit in a chair on stage all night, but that didn't matter the music was great!!!!!

Same here. And I saw him like in 1977-78.

[ABC]

Interesting. Where did you see her?
At the Casino "The Orleans" showroom. I think the ticket was $60.00. I am not a jazz fan and would not spend a nickel to see a jazz performer, no matter who it was.
I agree about the opening acts.
PS I still miss the Pips.

[tiptop]

At the Casino The Orleans.

Had enough time to google, huh? LOL

[daniel green]

Had enough time to google, huh? LOL

Totally uncalled for.

Apparently you did not read ABC's original post upthread, the one you questioned. :rolleyes:

I saw Gladys in concert week ago at the Orleans and she was terrific. She looks great. All it takes is money and a good stylist and/or plastic surgeon. I am not a Jackson fan and would not know Tito if I tripped over him. I missed the opening act as they are usually bad even for the Stones.:thumbup:

I have never known ABC to post something that is not truthful.

[tiptop]

Totally uncalled for.

Apparently you did not read ABC's original post upthread, the one you questioned. :rolleyes:



I have never known ABC to post something that is not truthful.

LOL - OK......all hail to Daniel.............

[daniel green]

Gosh, had you not edited ABC's post and misquoted it, you would have seen that her orginal post said where she saw GK. :rolleyes: Oh, misquoting posts like that is against TOS.

[tiptop]

Gosh, had you not edited ABC's post and misquoted it, you would have seen that her orginal post said where she saw GK. :rolleyes: Oh, misquoting posts like that is against TOS.

Check out post #47. No misquoting has been done. You came on the scene late, as usual, and are causing trouble. ABC edited after I quoted her (Post #44). Try and keep up.

[ABC]

:loveeyes::wub::loveeyes:Totally uncalled for.

Apparently you did not read ABC's original post upthread, the one you questioned.


I have never known ABC to post something that is not truthful.
Thank you, Daniel.

[tiptop]

:loveeyes::wub::loveeyes:
Thank you, Daniel.

But you did revise your original post --- the one I quoted. And you did it after I quoted it.

[daniel green]

:loveeyes::wub::loveeyes:
Thank you, Daniel.

It's the truth! I have never seen you post something untruthful in all the many posts I have read your posts. We don't often agree on politics, but I have never read anything you post be dishonest.

[tiptop]

It's the truth! I have never seen you post something untruthful in all the many posts I have read your posts. We don't often agree on politics, but I have never read anything you post be dishonest.

Can you acknowledge that ABC revised her post after I quoted it? It's plain for all to see.

[daniel green]

Posted at 9:49, edited at 9:53

I saw Gladys in concert week ago at the Orleans and she was terrific. She looks great. All it takes is money and a good stylist and/or plastic surgeon. I am not a Jackson fan and would not know Tito if I tripped over him. I missed the opening act as they are usually bad even for the Stones.:thumbup:

Posted at 9:51

Interesting. Where did you see her?

Posted at 10:17

At the Casino "The Orleans" showroom. I think the ticket was $60.00. I am not a jazz fan and would not spend a nickel to see a jazz performer, no matter who it was.
I agree about the opening acts.
PS I still miss the Pips.


Posted at 10:19


Had enough time to google, huh? LOL

Just ridiculous, truly.

[ABC]

But you did revise your original post --- the one I quoted. And you did it after I quoted it.

What?????? Yep, I did edit my post for clarification. Lying about concerts on a message board? I don't think so except Woodstock, of course.

[ScoobyDoo]

Check out post #47. No misquoting has been done. You came on the scene late, as usual, and are causing trouble. ABC edited after I quoted her (Post #44). Try and keep up.



You know... I have noticed that too.
:thumbdown:

[daniel green]

What?????? Yep, I did edit my post for clarification but not before your post. Lying about concerts on a message board? I don't think so except Woodstock, of course.

Oh, the work of an arm chair "sleuth" is never done, ABC. :wink:

As if. :laugh:

Besides, anyone who follows your posts, and has followed your posts for over a year, would know exactly where you saw her!

[tiptop]

What?????? Yep, I did edit my post for clarification but not before your post. Lying about concerts on a message board? I don't think so except Woodstock, of course.

LOOK at what was posted. I posted at 10:51. You revised at 10:53.

[tiptop]

You know... I have noticed that too.
:thumbdown:

Thank you. I am not a dishonest poster. I quoted someone and moments later they revised their post which changed the look of my post. Its all right there to be seen.

[tiptop]

Oh, the work of an arm chair "sleuth" is never done, ABC. :wink:

As if. :laugh:

Besides, anyone who follows your posts, and has followed your posts for over a year, would know exactly where you saw her!

A year? ABC has been on this board for much longer than that.

[ABC]

LOOK at what was posted. I posted at 10:51. You revised at 10:53.

OMG, the shame, the horror, the :scared:.

[tiptop]

OMG, the shame, the horror, the :scared:.

Yet you and daniel want to rake me over the coals. What if I accused you of changing someone's post? You think thats funny?

[tiptop]

OMG, the shame, the horror, the :scared:.


LOL - OK, I will take your lack of acknowledgment as a sign I was right. The right thing to do would be to admit the revision was made after I quoted you. But you cant do that. Ok, no worries...........

[ScoobyDoo]

Thank you. I am not a dishonest poster. I quoted someone and moments later they revised their post which changed the look of my post. Its all right there to be seen.

I understand. I don't think you are dishonest either. I have had similiar things happen. Also the excessive snipping of posts in order to mislead is sometimes problematic. I guess we learn to live with it.

[tiptop]

I understand. I don't think you are dishonest either. I have had similiar things happen. Also the excessive snipping of posts in order to mislead is sometimes problematic. I guess we learn to live with it.

You and I may not always agree, but in this case we do. Indeed we learn to live with it. :biggrin:

[ABC]

LOL - OK, I will take your lack of acknowledgment as a sign I was right. The right thing to do would be to admit the revision was made after I quoted you. But you cant do that. Ok, no worries...........

Tell you what you are not right about is accussing me at 10:19PM to be lying and googling the information about Gladys when I posted I saw her in concert. That is truely offensive and uncalled for to the extreme. That is something that needs to not only be acknowledged but an apology issued. Clearly, that is far more a grevious insult then editing a post or at least in my world. The rest of the "timing and revision", in my opinion is a smoke screen for the unnecessay and false accusation at 10:19PM. Yes, Daniel is correct and she knows exactly where Gladys was in concert.

[tiptop]

Tell you what you are not right about is accussing me at 10:19PM to be lying and googling the information about Gladys when I posted I saw her in concert. That is truely offensive and uncalled for to the extreme. That is something that needs to not only be acknowledged but an apology issued. Clearly, that is far more a grevious insult then editing a post or at least in my world. The rest of the "timing and revision", in my opinion is a smoke screen for the unnecessay and false accusation at 10:19PM. Yes, Daniel is correct and she knows exactly where Gladys was in concert.

Look at 10:51 when I answered you, and 10:53 when you revised your post that I reponded to. Why is that so difficult for you to go back and look at? 10:19 has nothing to do with it. And I am done with this as well. Report me if you feel the need. Geeze - what else can I do but quote the posts (#44 and 47). You revised your post AFTER I quoted you. Why is that so hard for you to understand?


ETA: LOL, everytime I look you have revised posts here tonight. As evidenced by the EDITED line under your posts.

[Pretty Leaf]

I can see this thread getting locked by this foolishness.

[vonna]

I can see this thread getting locked by this foolishness.

It deserves to be!!!

[vonna]

It deserves to be!!!

Re: The topic of this thread................

What's the old expression? Oh Yes. It's an ill wind that bloweth no man good.