then why was he making AN anchor?

[Regina.Lampert]

Originally posted by earth goddess


It was scheduled for July 8 but defense filed motion and they are meeting teh end of July to reschedule. Am monitoring the Modesto Bee on it. [/*]

Thank you Goddess!

[alter ego]

Originally posted by earth goddess

tHAT IS WRONG!!!!

The neighbor to the north (the old Reed house) was having concete work down in their back yard. The construction crew had removed a part of the fence between the houses and was accessing their back yard by way of the Peterson driveway. They, NOT SCOTT left the bag of concrete in the Peterson driveway. It was indeed a photograph by Katie and Jordy that showed this. The photograph was taken in August and the concrete samples the defense used in their testimony was taken in September. Geragos stipulated to this in the court - a wise move because Jordy was ready to tesify tso seeing that bag in her picture [/*]
No it's not WRONG!!!

The prosecution was indeed trying to show there was concrete work on the Peterson property that contaiminated the samples taken.

Geragos didn't stipulate to the photo. The Pros stipulated that the bag o'concrete in the picture wasn't open and that there was NO concrete work done on the Peterson property to contaiminate the samples Gebler testified about.

:read:

[earth goddess]

Originally posted by AngelWings



They serve the people by protecting us, and the fact that Scott is on death row means they're doing a good job. [/*]

Fladager was NOT the DA during this case. She was an EMPLOYEE, not an elected officdial at that time. Ditto for Distaso and Dave Harris

[Regina.Lampert]

Originally posted by BFD - v2.0


Experience?

Wow.

See, what people are missing is they keep thinking of Laci and the fetus as two separate individuals with 2 separate set of circumstances. And in fact, that is exactly what the physical evidence of their bodies would indicate.

BUT, the FACT of the matter is, the fetus and Laci were organism in a biological sense. If the theory about them being together in deep water, blah, blah, blah is true, then there is no explanation for the different rates and types of decomposition.

They were subjected to 2 different environments. And there is a very simple explanation. [/*]

Unless one was inside the other, protected until just before they were found, imo.

[Hey Paula]

Originally posted by Regina.Lampert


Unless one was inside the other, protected until just before they were found, imo. [/*]

Of course!

[earth goddess]

Originally posted by Raven


Wow....good to know who is REALLY posting here.....your reply is a dead give away.

Her camera WAS taken and WAS returned after the police determined NO photos showed the jurors. She didn't get "kicked out" as she wasn't inside, but outside the courtroom. And GA did offer to represent them pro bono as there were "threats", but I'm sure you will laugh at that too.

She DIDN'T have to testify since MG stipulated to her photos showing the opened bag of cement mix in the Peterson driveway in August, when he DIDN'T have the foresight to send his investigators out there for another 6 weeks. LMAO at his concrete "experts" sprinkle defense!!! [/*]

You are correct. Geragos is definitely NOT timely. He claims the Aponte tip (received by the Defenswe in May of 2004) was exculpatory based on his investigating the tip over six months later - he didn't sent anyone out for 6 months to verify this important exculpatory evidence for SIX months. No wonder he espouses the DELAY funcdrion of lawyering.

[Raven]

Originally posted by alter ego
Except there was no contaimination from an unopened bag of cement.

:lol: [/*]

The photo was of an OPENED bag of cement mix with the top rolled down. LOL!!

[Wudge+]

Originally posted by BFD - v2.0


Experience?

Wow.

See, what people are missing is they keep thinking of Laci and the fetus as two separate individuals with 2 separate set of circumstances. And in fact, that is exactly what the physical evidence of their bodies would indicate.

BUT, the FACT of the matter is, the fetus and Laci were organism in a biological sense. If the theory about them being together in deep water, blah, blah, blah is true, then there is no explanation for the different rates and types of decomposition.

They were subjected to 2 different environments. And there is a very simple explanation. [/*]

That explanation is?

[Wudge+]

Originally posted by earth goddess


You are correct. Geragos is definitely NOT timely. He claims the Aponte tip (received by the Defenswe in May of 2004) was exculpatory based on his investigating the tip over six months later - he didn't sent anyone out for 6 months to verify this important exculpatory evidence for SIX months. No wonder he espouses the DELAY funcdrion of lawyering. [/*]

He never received LE's field notes on its investigation of the Aponte tip.

[Luke Davis]

Originally posted by earth goddess


I believe this was told to Amber with great emotion and tears. And yes, Shawn was told in Ocrober at the conference in Anaheim I believe that Scott told HER he had lost his soul mate and thought he'd never find another one and did Shawn know anyone yada yada yada That's in the testimony. Soi the 'loss" was put into play over a MONTH before Scott was hooked up with Amber.

Scott only seemed to manage tears with Amber. Oh, and on national TV. I have never seen a man sit there with tears stream down his face. Men tend to wipe them away.

I believe, if you see the uncut tape, you will see him get up and go to the bathroom right before his 'tears' [/*]But that was before Thanksgiving. Scott indicated after Thanksgiving.


MOO:hat:

[earth goddess]

Originally posted by Luke Davis
But that was before Thanksgiving. Scott indicated after Thanksgiving.


MOO:hat: [/*]

Scott told Amber on the 9th I believe, the last day that Shawn gave him the ultimatum for.

The point is that he was telling people his wife was "lost" before she disappeared. And that = premeditation.

[earth goddess]

Originally posted by W_D_1



No it isn't. No one testified that Laci didn't go in the warehouse. [/*]
NO ONE TESTIFIED THAT LACI WAS IN THE LOCKED WAREHOUSE EITHER

[alter ego]

Originally posted by earth goddess


Scott told Amber on the 9th I believe, the last day that Shawn gave him the ultimatum for.

The point is that he was telling people his wife was "lost" before she disappeared. And that = premeditation. [/*]
No it doesn't. And the judge even ruled it wasn't.

[earth goddess]

Originally posted by W_D_1



We do know that Scott and Laci kept things from their families so it's not unusual that they didn't tell anyone about the boat purchase.

If no one saw her try to get into Scott's building who was supposed to testify about it? Did the woman whose bathroom she use stand outside watching everything Laci did before asking to use her bathroom? I don't remember her saying she did. [/*]

She never said IN the warehouse. She said AT the warehouse. Scott wasn't there so Laci couldn't use Scott's bathroom, nor could she see the boat. She asked to use the bathroom at the neighboring business. The actual woman did not testify so we cna't know. for sure. But we can know that Laci wouldn't have asked to use her bathroom IF she could have used Scott's - some common sense might be userful here.

[alter ego]

Originally posted by Raven


The photo was of an OPENED bag of cement mix with the top rolled down. LOL!! [/*]

No it wasn't.

http://www.scottisinnocent.com/Trial/Trial/Guilt/prosexhibits/295%20A-*.JPG

[Raven]

Originally posted by mcannie1965


With regard to your last paragraph, Laci wore stilleto heels in December.

mho [/*]

To a party, unaccompanied by Scott, who told her his boss had unexpectedly flown in. The picture shows her sitting in a chair....somehow I doubt she was flitting about on those "stilleto" heels.

He was with Amber at HER party......so once again, he lied.

[Raven]

Originally posted by alter ego


No it wasn't. [/*]

I've seen those photos as recently as this past November. No one would have been interested in an UNOPENED bag of cement.

The bag was opened and the top flap rolled down.

LOL....THAT site.....the one that converted fathoms to feet to accomodate scott NOT throwing her body into deep enough water....hilar!!!

[earth goddess]

Originally posted by W_D_1



Scott didn't tell any family or friends. That wasn't unusual for him. We don't know that he didn't tell Laci because she wasn't in the habit of telling her family everything either.

We don't know if she tried to get into Scott's building but couldn't get in. No one testified saying she didn't even try to go in. [/*]

Maybe this will help you believe that Laci did not know about the boat.


GERAGOS: Specifically you also asked Scott on the 25th, the same interview, if Laci had ever gone fishing with him, correct?
GROGAN: Yes.
GERAGOS: And he told you that he taken Laci on a catamaran, the boat had flipped over, and she said she wouldn't go on a boat with him after that; isn't that right?
GROGAN: That’s correct.

[alter ego]

Originally posted by earth goddess


She never said IN the warehouse. She said AT the warehouse. Scott wasn't there so Laci couldn't use Scott's bathroom, nor could she see the boat. She asked to use the bathroom at the neighboring business. The actual woman did not testify so we cna't know. for sure. But we can know that Laci wouldn't have asked to use her bathroom IF she could have used Scott's - some common sense might be userful here. [/*]Yeah, why don't you start doing that.

The bathroom in Scott's warehouse was blocked which is why Laci used the neighbor's bathroom.

[alter ego]

Originally posted by Raven


I've seen those photos as recently as this past November. No one would have been interested in an UNOPENED bag of cement.

The bag was opened and the top flap rolled down.

LOL....THAT site.....the one that converted fathoms to feet to accomodate scott NOT throwing her body into deep enough water....hilar!!! [/*]

The photos entered into evidence by the Pros do not show an opened bag of concrete. I can't account for the Pros being inerested in an unopened bag o'concrete.

[earth goddess]

Originally posted by W_D_1



If someone else killed Laci in a location unknown to police there may very well have been forensic evidence.

The police weren't interested in looking at any other angles. They focused on Scott from day one to the exclusion of all else. [/*]


The police ALWAYS start nearest the victim and work out. They couldn't get away from Scott - he did that to himself. His behavior (such as not appearing with the family on stage at the vigil) forced them to keep him as a person of interest. The family is sitting on t he stage emotional, and he's out in the crowd laughing and smiling and talking to his girl friend. '

RED FLAGS

[alter ego]

Originally posted by earth goddess


Maybe this will help you believe that Laci did not know about the boat.


GERAGOS: Specifically you also asked Scott on the 25th, the same interview, if Laci had ever gone fishing with him, correct?
GROGAN: Yes.
GERAGOS: And he told you that he taken Laci on a catamaran, the boat had flipped over, and she said she wouldn't go on a boat with him after that; isn't that right?
GROGAN: That’s correct. [/*]

Non sequitur

[Luke Davis]

Originally posted by earth goddess


Scott told Amber on the 9th I believe, the last day that Shawn gave him the ultimatum for.

The point is that he was telling people his wife was "lost" before she disappeared. And that = premeditation. [/*]I agree. But what makes it hard to believe is, Scott was dating Amber before Laci's body was cold. He later covered his tracks by saying there are many kinds of loss.

It would be like you meeting someone before Memorial Day and they say the Fourth of July will be their first holiday since their wife was lost. Not exactly a great pickup line in my book. But Scott tells so many lies for little or no reason, it is difficult to give credence to some and not to others.



MOO:hat:

[earth goddess]

Originally posted by W_D_1


They may not have used the word but I'd say one juror standing on the courthouse steps immediately following the verdict and screaming at Scott that he was an a-hole qualifies as hate. [/*]

I watched this trial from beginning to end and I never saw or heard anything about this. Can you provide a link to this

I also find this impossible since the jury held a press conference immediately after and Scott was put back in his cell for later transport - he didn't step outside until he arrived at SQ.

In fact, it's my opinion that this is another 'made up" fact. If that had happened, it would have been all over the news media. BTW, the jurors did not exist the building through the frront steps. If you followed the trial closely, you would have known they entered and left through an entrance not covered by the cameras.

[BFD - v2.0]

Originally posted by alter ego


No it wasn't.

http://www.scottisinnocent.com/Trial/Trial/Guilt/prosexhibits/295%20A-*.JPG [/*]

You guys are aware that the SII site has been compromised and the site itself is responsible for installing trojan viruses, right?

The owners of the site might not even be aware of this (third parties can compromise a site in that manner), but there were 5 pages on the site responsible for installing trojans as recently as 6/28

Personally, I will not go to that site for that very reason.

[Luke Davis]

Originally posted by alter ego

No it doesn't. And the judge even ruled it wasn't. [/*]If a man lies about being married or the status of being married to a woman, that is premeditation in my mind.


MOO

[earth goddess]

Originally posted by Luke Davis
I agree. But what makes it hard to believe is, Scott was dating Amber before Laci's body was cold. He later covered his tracks by saying there are many kinds of loss.

It would be like you meeting someone before Memorial Day and they say the Fourth of July will be their first holiday since their wife was lost. Not exactly a great pickup line in my book. But Scott tells so many lies for little or no reason, it is difficult to give credence to some and not to others.



MOO:hat: [/*]

I think he planned on getting rid of Laci for some time. I think Shawn's ultimatum to him to tell Amber made him move up his timetable. I think he originally planned to do it right before his trip to Europe In January. He would be out of reach in Europe.

[Raven]

Originally posted by earth goddess


I watched this trial from beginning to end and I never saw or heard anything about this. Can you provide a link to this

I also find this impossible since the jury held a press conference immediately after and Scott was put back in his cell for later transport - he didn't step outside until he arrived at SQ. [/*]

ITA! The jury didn't "run" outside to join the cheering throng. They are escorted by their bailiffs at all times and weren't gonna break away to jeer at him.

Hey, remember when Ron G. mouthed "I'm sorry" to Lee and Lee shot back with an "F you"? I DO remember that being reported by CTV, although I don't recall the context of it.

[earth goddess]

Originally posted by Raven


ITA! The jury didn't "run" outside to join the cheering throng. They are escorted by their bailiffs at all times and weren't gonna break away to jeer at him.

Hey, remember when Ron G. mouthed "I'm sorry" to Lee and Lee shot back with an "F you"? I DO remember that being reported by CTV, although I don't recall the context of it. [/*]

Scott was in a suit at the trial - he was taken back to his cell to change into an orange jumpsuit. We all saw him being excorted to a van to go to SQ. He was NOT near the courthouse steps. And he was excorted by LE at every step.

I wonder how much more fictional things they will try to pass off wiwth the excuse that there are no links.

[Luke Davis]

Originally posted by BFD - v2.0


You guys are aware that the SII site has been compromised and the site itself is responsible for installing trojan viruses, right?

The owners of the site might not even be aware of this (third parties can compromise a site in that manner), but there were 5 pages on the site responsible for installing trojans as recently as 6/28

Personally, I will not go to that site for that very reason. [/*]When I use Google, it warns me not to go there. Something about the site can damge my computer.



MOO:hat:

[GrandmaGA]

Originally posted by earth goddess


I watched this trial from beginning to end and I never saw or heard anything about this. Can you provide a link to this

I also find this impossible since the jury held a press conference immediately after and Scott was put back in his cell for later transport - he didn't step outside until he arrived at SQ. [/*]

You did not watch the trial from beginning to end unless you were in the courtroom daily and I doubt you were that lucky to win the lottery to get in everyday. Can you provide a link you were in the courtroom every day?

[GrandmaGA]

Originally posted by earth goddess


*snipped*
I wonder how much more fictional things they will try to pass off wiwth the excuse that there are no links. [/*]

Like you do?

[Raven]

Originally posted by BFD - v2.0


You guys are aware that the SII site has been compromised and the site itself is responsible for installing trojan viruses, right?

The owners of the site might not even be aware of this (third parties can compromise a site in that manner), but there were 5 pages on the site responsible for installing trojans as recently as 6/28

Personally, I will not go to that site for that very reason. [/*]

Raven's Reason #42 NOT to go to that site! :lol:

[GrandmaGA]

Originally posted by Luke Davis
If a man lies about being married or the status of being married to a woman, that is premeditation in my mind.


MOO [/*]

Yeah right. :rolleyes: Married men AND women lie all the time about their marital status to get what they want from the oppisite sex.

[Luke Davis]

Originally posted by GrandmaGA


Yeah right. :rolleyes: Married men AND women lie all the time about their marital status to get what they want from the oppisite sex. [/*]Exactly! And it isn't always spur of the moment.


MOO:hat:

[Okito]

Originally posted by GrandmaGA


You did not watch the trial from beginning to end unless you were in the courtroom daily and I doubt you were that lucky to win the lottery to get in everyday. Can you provide a link you were in the courtroom every day? [/*]

From the tone of this response, it sounds as if YOU were in court.....care to share? Total and unmitigated support for a convicted wife and baby killer???

[GrandmaGA]

Originally posted by Okito


From the tone of this response, it sounds as if YOU were in court.....care to share? Total and unmitigated support for a convicted wife and baby killer??? [/*]

Of course I wasn't in court and I never said I was unlike EG who said she "watched" the trial from beginning to end.

As far as your last statement, not even worth reply, very immature IMO.

[Mamie]

Originally posted by earth goddess


Scott was in a suit at the trial - he was taken back to his cell to change into an orange jumpsuit. We all saw him being excorted to a van to go to SQ. He was NOT near the courthouse steps. And he was excorted by LE at every step.

I wonder how much more fictional things they will try to pass off wiwth the excuse that there are no links. [/*]

Yeah wasn't that the film clip they kept showing on television where he konked his head on the top of the van door getting in?

[Okito]

Originally posted by GrandmaGA


Of course I wasn't in court and I never said I was unlike EG who said she "watched" the trial from beginning to end.

As far as your last statement, not even worth reply, very immature IMO. [/*]

What's immature about my comment? Don't you totally support him? It certainly sounds as if you do.

And he IS a convicted wife and baby killer.

I totally support the opposite view and would never take offense. As a matter of fact, I'm 100% proud that I knew he was guilty from the first news report on TV Xmas Day....without knowing what he looked like, where he came from, what advantages or not he had, and a million other details.

[alter ego]

Originally posted by earth goddess


I watched this trial from beginning to end and I never saw or heard anything about this. Can you provide a link to this

I also find this impossible since the jury held a press conference immediately after and Scott was put back in his cell for later transport - he didn't step outside until he arrived at SQ.

In fact, it's my opinion that this is another 'made up" fact. If that had happened, it would have been all over the news media. BTW, the jurors did not exist the building through the frront steps. If you followed the trial closely, you would have known they entered and left through an entrance not covered by the cameras. [/*]
Rachelle Nice most certainly did call Scott an a-hole in post verdict press conference.

It's not a made up fact at all.

[GrandmaGA]

Originally posted by AngelWings


What I found interesting Grandma was that in the 200 or so taped conversations between Amber and Scott, nothing sexual was ever spoken about, so I don't get all the he only wanted sex idea. [/*]

He got sex the first night they met when he supposedly told Amber he was "unmarried".

[Okito]

Originally posted by mcannie1965


Two jurors were taunting Scott with the verdict...It was all over the news! They showed them taunting him with the verdict, and callking him an ^*&%#@

mho [/*]

Scott had access to a TV? I thought that wasn't allowed CONVICTED wife and baby killers?

I'd like a link please and to know who these 2 jurors were. I saw the presser from the jury and do NOT recall anyone "taunting" him at all. What did they callk him? :lol:

[earth goddess]

Originally posted by Mamie


Yeah wasn't that the film clip they kept showing on television where he konked his head on the top of the van door getting in? [/*]

Yes, that's the one - did you see any courthouse steps in that?

When prisoners are transported, they do NOT use the front or main entrances EVER - In Stanislaus they are excorted out through the underground parking area which is behind locked gates - shackles.

In the Public Service Center, they are escorted out a side door into a fenced area - in shackles

[alter ego]

Originally posted by Luke Davis
If a man lies about being married or the status of being married to a woman, that is premeditation in my mind.


MOO [/*]:confused:

[Mamie]

Originally posted by earth goddess


Yes, that's the one - did you see any courthouse steps in that?

When prisoners are transported, they do NOT use the front or main entrances EVER - In Stanislaus they are excorted out through the underground parking area which is behind locked gates - shackles.

In the Public Service Center, they are escorted out a side door into a fenced area - in shackles [/*]

Exactly right!

[earth goddess]

Originally posted by mcannie1965


Ron was "sorry?" He said Scott got what he deserved.

mho [/*]

That doesn't mean that Ron could not have sympathy for the parents of teh convicted double murdere

[Okito]

Originally posted by GrandmaGA


He got sex the first night they met when he supposedly told Amber he was "unmarried". [/*]

Supposedly??????? :lol:

Bet if he had told her the truth, she would have booked outta The Elephant Bar as fast as she could.......he wasn't all that you know.

[GrandmaGA]

Originally posted by AngelWings



I don't think EG said she was in court everyday, I think she said she watched the trial, meaning some days in court, as well as following it on TV reports and interviews. That's how I took it anyway. [/*]

Following it on TV is NOT watching the trial from beginning to end. TV did not show everything.

Her post, red mine.........................earth goddess
Member

Registered: Oct 2005
Location: back home in Modesto
Posts: 985




I watched this trial from beginning to end and I never saw or heard anything about this. Can you provide a link to this

I also find this impossible since the jury held a press conference immediately after and Scott was put back in his cell for later transport - he didn't step outside until he arrived at SQ.

In fact, it's my opinion that this is another 'made up" fact. If that had happened, it would have been all over the news media. BTW, the jurors did not exist the building through the frront steps. If you followed the trial closely, you would have known they entered and left through an entrance not covered by the cameras.


Last edited by earth goddess on 06-29-2008 at 02:45 PM

[earth goddess]

Originally posted by mcannie1965


Two jurors were taunting Scott with the verdict...It was all over the news! They showed them taunting him with the verdict, and callking him an ^*&%#@

mho [/*]

Then show us the clip. The jurors held a press conference and then were escorted back to their hotel. Scott was escorted back to his cell to await transport to SQ. They showed him being loaded into a van and it was in a PARKING GARAGE - there were no jurors shown in that clip at all.

Your fantasy doesn't make it true. Name the jurors that were doing this, pelase.

[GrandmaGA]

Originally posted by mcannie1965


They taunted him with the verdict. I am not going to repeat on this board what they called him . One of the jurors said "Bye, Bye, Scottie, San Quenton is your new home."They must have thought he had a television at SQ...or they wouldn't have taunted him with the verdict.

There is NO link. I saw it on television.

mho [/*]

IMO that was said and done for their adoring public and for interest in their upcoming book.

[earth goddess]

Originally posted by mcannie1965


He had sympathy for Lee and Jackie? GMAB.

mho [/*] He had a lot more than Jackie did for Laci and "that" baby

[Okito]

Originally posted by mcannie1965


They taunted him with the verdict. I am not going to repeat on this board what they called him . One of the jurors said "Bye, Bye, Scottie, San Quenton is your new home."They must have thought he had a television at SQ...or they wouldn't have taunted him with the verdict.

There is NO link. I saw it on television.

mho [/*]

Who is the second juror? The post said 2 jurors and of course, everyone has named Strawberry, the juror Geragos thought was a definite NG!! LOL!!!

I saw the presser with the foreman, SS, and the guy with glasses. I DO NOT remember any such statement or remark.

I will have to go Google cuz I simply trust my memory over a scott supporter who never believes anyone is guilty.

[alter ego]

Originally posted by AngelWings


So did his lawyer in his closing statements, and besides, what's wrong with telling the truth? [/*]No he didn't.

[earth goddess]

Still waiting for that Juror or jurors taunting Scott. Get your stories together, one of you says one, one says two, I say it was NONE And Scott was never exposed to the crowds out in front - he went from thg courtroom through an interior hallway back to the jail - he was NEVER exposed to the public at all.

BTW, he DOES have a TV in SQ. But no cable.. No porn, no wine, and no cell phones.

[Okito]

Originally posted by mcannie1965



He was trying to see if Amber was involved in the disappearance of Laci.

He asked her flat out if she was involved on one of the tapes.

He also told Amber that he loved Laci.

mho [/*]

I've asked you this before but you never respond.

If Amber did NOT know Laci existed until December 30th, how would she have had anything to do with Laci's disappearance? Was she as clairvoyant as Scott when he said he had "lost" his wife? Before he "lost" her????

And Scott is such a liar, why is it you accept him saying he loved Laci as the truth when he couldn't even be honest with his own mother?

Of course he would "say" he loved her......he even told Diane Sawyer that he had told LE about Amber the night of Dec. 24th!! That was a GOOD one!!
:lol:

[earth goddess]

Originally posted by mcannie1965



He was trying to see if Amber was involved in the disappearance of Laci.

He asked her flat out if she was involved on one of the tapes.

He also told Amber that he loved Laci.

mho [/*]''Link to that tape please. They are lsited at the Peterson site at TruTV. Do some work for a change

[GrandmaGA]

Originally posted by AngelWings


If he didn't call him one, he referred to him as one. [/*]

No he didn't.

[earth goddess]

Originally posted by Okito


Who is the second juror? The post said 2 jurors and of course, everyone has named Strawberry, the juror Geragos thought was a definite NG!! LOL!!!

I saw the presser with the foreman, SS, and the guy with glasses. I DO NOT remember any such statement or remark.

I will have to go Google cuz I simply trust my memory over a scott supporter who never believes anyone is guilty. [/*]

It was seen on TV yet there is no link - TV stations have links all over the place. Think of the timing on this. Jurors are taken on a bus back to their hotel, where they have to pack up and check out. Scott goes directly back to his cell. He has access to TV in jail. I maintain that NONE of those people in front were jurors - just interested citizens who felt that justice had been served.

The media WANTED to talk to the jurors - yet there is NO tape or picture of a juror taunting Scott? ROFLMAO

[alter ego]

Originally posted by AngelWings


If he didn't call him one, he referred to him as one. [/*]No he didn't

[alter ego]

Originally posted by earth goddess


It was seen on TV yet there is no link - TV stations have links all over the place. Think of the timing on this. Jurors are taken on a bus back to their hotel, where they have to pack up and check out. Scott goes directly back to his cell. He has access to TV in jail. I maintain that NONE of those people in front were jurors - just interested citizens who felt that justice had been served.

The media WANTED to talk to the jurors - yet there is NO tape or picture of a juror taunting Scott? ROFLMAO [/*]
They addressed him by name.

[alter ego]

Originally posted by earth goddess


It was seen on TV yet there is no link - TV stations have links all over the place. [/*]Then please do me a favor and link the post verdict press conference with the Prosecution team since "TV stations have links all over the place"

I've been looking all over for it and can't find it, but since you seem to know all about links that TV stations have, perhaps you will have more success in finding it.

Thanks!

[GrandmaGA]

Originally posted by earth goddess


It was seen on TV yet there is no link - TV stations have links all over the place. Think of the timing on this. Jurors are taken on a bus back to their hotel, where they have to pack up and check out. Scott goes directly back to his cell. He has access to TV in jail. I maintain that NONE of those people in front were jurors - just interested citizens who felt that justice had been served.

The media WANTED to talk to the jurors - yet there is NO tape or picture of a juror taunting Scott? ROFLMAO [/*]

Others saw it too, even thsoe who think he is guilty.

"Fed-X03-16-2005, 08:15 PM
I'm watching On the Record with Gretta Van Sus.... and they just showed a news conference(?) with the red headed juror from Scott Peterson's trial... I think her name is Richelle Nice She was acting all manic, lifted up her shades, and said something about Scott Peterson should look people in the eyes when they are talking to him.... She went on to call him an "asshole" while her head was half turned...

I'm not sure if this will have any future merit, but damn if she isn't acting super personal about all of this... Of course, she could be "high" on all the attention this trial has brought her but it seems to me she is over emotional and taking a stance... I wonder if this will give an additional cause for an appeal reversal.
I wonder how much she and others voted on the real merits of the case vs. personal dislike for Scott.

We have sentencing consultants for good reason... Maybe defendants need acting lessons to boot...

So, is it just me that is semi-bothered about how aggressive this woman is being? I tend to lean towards him being guilty myself but this is something seperate...

http://www.prisontalk.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-112798.html

""San Quentin's your new home," said Rochelle Nice, a juror interviewed after the death sentence was handed down.

Nice then called Peterson an "asshole" while walking away from cameras. This isn't exactly what is defined as a levelheaded juror, and it's pretty tough to think Peterson got a fair trial after hearing that. A person who cannot separate her personal feelings far enough away from the case itself - one has to ask how she made it past the infant stages of jury selection. "

http://media.www.webujournal.com/media/storage/paper245/news/2005/03/24/Opinioneditorial/Petersons.Shot.At.Fair.Trial.Ruined.Media.Continue d.To.Fuel.The.Fire-900981.shtml

[alter ego]

Originally posted by AngelWings


He said he DESERVES to feel like one. Same thing.



But I'll tell you by all accounts, he treated Laci with a great deal of respect. He treated Laci, or gave Laci a great deal of love. He cheated on Laci, and he feels like a fourteen karat asshole for doing it. He deserves to feel that way. But, at the same time, you know, he said something in that interview that, I thought, spoke volumes anybody who's ever been married. Really it's nobody else's business but the married couple of what their relationship is.

http://www.scottisinnocent.com/Timelines/Trial%20Transcripts/Defense%20Closing%20Statement.htm [/*]

No, it isn't the same thing at all.

[alter ego]

Originally posted by AngelWings


I believe you are the one who posted they said this, so aren't you the one who should provide the link to back it up? [/*]Is there something about 'prosection team' you failed to grasp?

[alter ego]

Originally posted by GrandmaGA


Others saw it too, even thsoe who think he is guilty.

"Fed-X03-16-2005, 08:15 PM
I'm watching On the Record with Gretta Van Sus.... and they just showed a news conference(?) with the red headed juror from Scott Peterson's trial... I think her name is Richelle Nice She was acting all manic, lifted up her shades, and said something about Scott Peterson should look people in the eyes when they are talking to him.... She went on to call him an "asshole" while her head was half turned...

I'm not sure if this will have any future merit, but damn if she isn't acting super personal about all of this... Of course, she could be "high" on all the attention this trial has brought her but it seems to me she is over emotional and taking a stance... I wonder if this will give an additional cause for an appeal reversal.
I wonder how much she and others voted on the real merits of the case vs. personal dislike for Scott.

We have sentencing consultants for good reason... Maybe defendants need acting lessons to boot...

So, is it just me that is semi-bothered about how aggressive this woman is being? I tend to lean towards him being guilty myself but this is something seperate...

http://www.prisontalk.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-112798.html

""San Quentin's your new home," said Rochelle Nice, a juror interviewed after the death sentence was handed down.

Nice then called Peterson an "asshole" while walking away from cameras. This isn't exactly what is defined as a levelheaded juror, and it's pretty tough to think Peterson got a fair trial after hearing that. A person who cannot separate her personal feelings far enough away from the case itself - one has to ask how she made it past the infant stages of jury selection. "

http://media.www.webujournal.com/media/storage/paper245/news/2005/03/24/Opinioneditorial/Petersons.Shot.At.Fair.Trial.Ruined.Media.Continue d.To.Fuel.The.Fire-900981.shtml [/*]

well gosh, guess that blows earth goddess' argument out of the water :tongue:

[earth goddess]

Originally posted by AngelWings


Oh, I know this, and I agree. They did have sex the very first night. I meant the statement that that's the ONLY thing Scot was after. I really don't know what he was after with Amber, but sex was never once mentioned in all those taped phone conversations. [/*]

And he never had sex iwth her after the murders altho he did try to lure her to Lake Arrowhead. Why did he continue to try to keep in touch with her. Couldn't be for sex because he wasn't getting any. And he never questioned Amber about any possible involvement in the disappearance of Laci. It was Amber who was questioning Scott, not VICE VERSA. In fact, in the Jan 6 conversation he tells her his wife is ALIVE in MODESTO.

[Luke Davis]

Originally posted by Okito


I've asked you this before but you never respond.

If Amber did NOT know Laci existed until December 30th, how would she have had anything to do with Laci's disappearance? Was she as clairvoyant as Scott when he said he had "lost" his wife? Before he "lost" her????

And Scott is such a liar, why is it you accept him saying he loved Laci as the truth when he couldn't even be honest with his own mother?

Of course he would "say" he loved her......he even told Diane Sawyer that he had told LE about Amber the night of Dec. 24th!! That was a GOOD one!!
:lol: [/*]Amber believed Laci existed until after Thanksgiving.


MOO:hat:

[alter ego]

Originally posted by AngelWings



What I grasped is you posted information with no link and you were asked for that link, which you would not provide. Would you like me to go back and get your post? [/*]Absolutely.

Here is the series of posts:
---------------------------------
Originally posted by earth goddess

It was seen on TV yet there is no link - TV stations have links all over the place. [/*]
----------------------------
Originally posted by alter ego
Then please do me a favor and link the post verdict press conference with the Prosecution team since "TV stations have links all over the place"

I've been looking all over for it and can't find it, but since you seem to know all about links that TV stations have, perhaps you will have more success in finding it.

Thanks! [/*]
----------------------------
Originally posted by AngelWings

I believe you are the one who posted they said this, so aren't you the one who should provide the link to back it up? [/*]
-------------------------

Exactly what did I post that the prosecution team said? I simply asked if EG, who seems to know all about links for TV stations, could help me find one.


:read:

[alter ego]

Originally posted by mcannie1965


I am still searching thru my tape collection for a copy of the post verdict press conference.

mho [/*]Maybe EG will help out since she knows so much about TV station links.

[GrandmaGA]

Originally posted by alter ego


well gosh, guess that blows earth goddess' argument out of the water :tongue: [/*]

She will ignore it as she does other links that are provided that she doesn't agree with.:shrug:

[earth goddess]

Originally posted by GrandmaGA


Others saw it too, even thsoe who think he is guilty.

"Fed-X03-16-2005, 08:15 PM
I'm watching On the Record with Gretta Van Sus.... and they just showed a news conference(?) with the red headed juror from Scott Peterson's trial... I think her name is Richelle Nice She was acting all manic, lifted up her shades, and said something about Scott Peterson should look people in the eyes when they are talking to him.... She went on to call him an "asshole" while her head was half turned...

I'm not sure if this will have any future merit, but damn if she isn't acting super personal about all of this... Of course, she could be "high" on all the attention this trial has brought her but it seems to me she is over emotional and taking a stance... I wonder if this will give an additional cause for an appeal reversal.
I wonder how much she and others voted on the real merits of the case vs. personal dislike for Scott.

We have sentencing consultants for good reason... Maybe defendants need acting lessons to boot...

So, is it just me that is semi-bothered about how aggressive this woman is being? I tend to lean towards him being guilty myself but this is something seperate...

http://www.prisontalk.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-112798.html

""San Quentin's your new home," said Rochelle Nice, a juror interviewed after the death sentence was handed down.

Nice then called Peterson an "asshole" while walking away from cameras. This isn't exactly what is defined as a levelheaded juror, and it's pretty tough to think Peterson got a fair trial after hearing that. A person who cannot separate her personal feelings far enough away from the case itself - one has to ask how she made it past the infant stages of jury selection. "

http://media.www.webujournal.com/media/storage/paper245/news/2005/03/24/Opinioneditorial/Petersons.Shot.At.Fair.Trial.Ruined.Media.Continue d.To.Fuel.The.Fire-900981.shtml [/*]

A blog and an editorial. Great sources - do you have a link to thalleged Greta show where this occured?

[GrandmaGA]

Originally posted by earth goddess


A blog and an editorial. Great sources - do you have a link to thalleged Greta show where this occured? [/*]


:lol: I guess you have "forgotten" that this case is not exactly top news 5 years after the conviction. You said there was no link, i provided TWO and still it's not good enough for you. REMEMBER this IS an opinion board and you are NOT the only one entitled to an opinion.

You talk about my links being "great sources" how about your " i live here I know everything", you think that is a "great source"? :lol:

[alter ego]

Originally posted by GrandmaGA


She will ignore it as she does other links that are provided that she doesn't agree with.:shrug: [/*]

or discredit it.


ETA. yup, she did. :lol:

[alter ego]

Originally posted by GrandmaGA



:lol: I guess you have "forgotten" that this case is not exactly top news 5 years after the conviction. You said there was no link, i provided TWO and still it's not good enough for you. REMEMBER this IS an opinion board and you are NOT the only one entitled to an opinion.

You talk about my links being "great sources" how about your " i live here I know everything", you think that is a "great source"? :lol: [/*]

And don't forget, CC's book

:lol:

[GrandmaGA]

Originally posted by alter ego


or discredit it.


ETA. yup, she did. :lol: [/*]

It seems she won't be happy until EVERYONE agrees with her and not dare give an opinion that doesn't agree with her. :shrug: It won' t happen IMO.

[alter ego]

Originally posted by earth goddess


A blog and an editorial. Great sources - do you have a link to thalleged Greta show where this occured? [/*]

CNN showed snippets of it.

[GrandmaGA]

Originally posted by alter ego


CNN showed snippets of it. [/*]

No use bothering with her. She won't believe anything she doesn't want to.

[alter ego]

Originally posted by AngelWings


You just did the exact same thing. I posted a link where Geregos said in the closing statement that Scott deserved to feel like a 14k a-hole, and you say, nope not the same thing.

You sound like you're talking about yourself. [/*]I didn't discredit your link.

I discredited your interpretation of what Geragos said.

So, no, I didn't do 'the exact same thing'.

[Luke Davis]

Originally posted by mcannie1965


Brent talked about Laci in the past tense only a day or two after she went missing.

mho [/*]That is common where the interviewer is asking about past events.


MOO

[Luke Davis]

Originally posted by W_D_1


Apparently the interviewer didn't think it was common and called the MPD about it. [/*]Selective hearing.


MOO:hat:

[Wudge+]

Originally posted by W_D_1



No that doesn't prove Laci didn't know about the boat. It only proves she wouldn't go on a boat. [/*]

No evidence supports valid and true premises that would reliably force the conclusion that the boat was meant to be a secret from Laci or others.