May 27 to [Archive] - In Session Message Boards

north-eh

05-27-2008, 10:16 PM

Originally posted by Soldiermom08
I'm glad they haven't given up hope. WHO KNEW there were so many blue barrels in this world??? Its nice that they are cleaning up the waterways. Hopefully whatever they get for the barrels recycling them can go back into the search effort.

jmo [/*]

I guess I was thinking of the danger present when Roy had the lit cigerate going at the same time when he was opening the barrells. Wonder what he was thinking?? Poof!
Oh BTW thanks Riverwalk for the link.;)
N

aubrey04

05-28-2008, 12:26 AM

I hope Stacy is found but Drew Peterson has always been so arrogant and adamant that she won't be found - so there is a part of me that wonders whether he truly did something like -- dismembered her or took out his airplane vessel and dumped her in a remote place.

I do not know - it doesn't seem he is too concerned about them finding her because he knows there is only a slim chance that they will.

I certainly hope that I am wrong about this.

no1what

05-28-2008, 08:46 AM

Originally posted by RiverWalk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWDI7xBV_mM

Try this link. [/*]

-----------------------------------------------------------------

imo if they did find Stacy the way they are handling the barrels is not by code and could contaminate any evidence. I hope they are handling the barrels in question very differently than what this video demonstrates. However if they find the barrel JB would probably use this video to show that the evidence is tainted. No gloves etc……

Also why would you open a barrel in the water that may have an unknown chemical? Should we be dumping unknown chemicals into the open waters?

I know they are doing their best but maybe they shouldn't be giving JB and Drew video evidence that could be used against the search findings.

unclezeek

05-28-2008, 10:14 AM

Originally posted by no1what

-----------------------------------------------------------------

imo if they did find Stacy the way they are handling the barrels is not by code and could contaminate any evidence. I hope they are handling the barrels in question very differently than what this video demonstrates. However if they find the barrel JB would probably use this video to show that the evidence is tainted. No gloves etc……

Also why would you open a barrel in the water that may have an unknown chemical? Should we be dumping unknown chemicals into the open waters?

I know they are doing their best but maybe they shouldn't be giving JB and Drew video evidence that could be used against the search findings. [/*]From what I understand, the people using this boat have gone throug extensive training, and know not to comprimise any potential evidence.
Don't picture Cassandra and Sharon in this boat, it's like three guys who know what they are looking for and know what to do if they find anything.
I will not give out any names, but I do know one of the searchers is former FBI. This isn't being taken lightly, not at all.

TopsyCrete

05-28-2008, 11:13 AM

Originally posted by unclezeek
From what I understand, the people using this boat have gone throug extensive training, and know not to comprimise any potential evidence.
Don't picture Cassandra and Sharon in this boat, it's like three guys who know what they are looking for and know what to do if they find anything.
I will not give out any names, but I do know one of the searchers is former FBI. This isn't being taken lightly, not at all. [/*]
The mental picture cracked me up. Sorry. :lol: :biggrin:

north-eh

05-28-2008, 11:59 AM

Originally posted by unclezeek
From what I understand, the people using this boat have gone throug extensive training, and know not to comprimise any potential evidence.
Don't picture Cassandra and Sharon in this boat, it's like three guys who know what they are looking for and know what to do if they find anything.
I will not give out any names, but I do know one of the searchers is former FBI. This isn't being taken lightly, not at all. [/*]

Hi UZ, isn't this interesting.
Do you know then if they are giving more credence to the blue barrel/tub/container theory,or is this just your opinion?? Seems like a big expense to have otherwise, just wandering.:)
N

Jpanda

05-28-2008, 01:42 PM

Originally posted by unclezeek
From what I understand, the people using this boat have gone throug extensive training, and know not to comprimise any potential evidence.
Don't picture Cassandra and Sharon in this boat, it's like three guys who know what they are looking for and know what to do if they find anything.
I will not give out any names, but I do know one of the searchers is former FBI. This isn't being taken lightly, not at all. [/*]

Thanks for posting this UZ. I thought I read somewhere that they were trained professionals too.

I noticed that DP has been relatively quiet since they've started this particular search with the Stacy Ann.....makes me think they very well might be on to something.

JMO

Justice_Dawg

05-28-2008, 10:42 PM

DP must have thought no one would believe a "nut case" like his brother.

I think he thought wrong. :)

tallcoolone

05-28-2008, 11:08 PM

Human remains found on Lynwood farm

Police seeking clues to its identity

Tribune staff report4:29 PM CDT, May 28, 2008

Lynwood police are trying to determine the identity of a person whose skeletal remains were found Tuesday morning in a farmer's field.

"We're looking at missing person reports to see if there's any connection, but right now we're waiting to see if the medical examiner's office can clarify if it was male or female," said Police Chief Russell Pearson.

A farmer called police after he noticed the human remains.

"He was out fertilizing his field and got out to walk the property, which has a wooded section right off of 202nd Street and Burnham Avenue," Pearson said. "He said he noticed it right away."

More at link...............

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/l,1910108.story (http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-lynwood-body_both_29may29,0,1910108.story)

Justice_Dawg

05-28-2008, 11:26 PM

Originally posted by tallcoolone
Human remains found on Lynwood farm

Police seeking clues to its identity

Tribune staff report4:29 PM CDT, May 28, 2008

Lynwood police are trying to determine the identity of a person whose skeletal remains were found Tuesday morning in a farmer's field.

"We're looking at missing person reports to see if there's any connection, but right now we're waiting to see if the medical examiner's office can clarify if it was male or female," said Police Chief Russell Pearson.

A farmer called police after he noticed the human remains.

"He was out fertilizing his field and got out to walk the property, which has a wooded section right off of 202nd Street and Burnham Avenue," Pearson said. "He said he noticed it right away."

More at link...............

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/l,1910108.story (http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-lynwood-body_both_29may29,0,1910108.story) [/*]

About 40 miles. Right?

Justice_Dawg

05-28-2008, 11:31 PM

That map left at the neighbors was to a cemetary in Lynwood, IL
Remember that?

Jpanda

05-29-2008, 10:15 AM

Originally posted by Justice_Dawg
That map left at the neighbors was to a cemetary in Lynwood, IL
Remember that? [/*]

I remember that and I think you're right! What a creepy coincidence if it isn't her then.

Jmo

no1what

05-29-2008, 10:43 AM

Originally posted by Justice_Dawg
That map left at the neighbors was to a cemetary in Lynwood, IL
Remember that? [/*]

-----------------------------------------------------------------

I guess I missed that piece of information. Do you have a link?

IMO Stacy would be so proud of everyone here who is defending her rights as a victim.

Jpanda

05-29-2008, 12:17 PM

Originally posted by no1what

-----------------------------------------------------------------

I guess I missed that piece of information. Do you have a link?

IMO Stacy would be so proud of everyone here who is defending her rights as a victim. [/*]

Here's a link for ya - http://gretawire.foxnews.com/2007/12/26/email-from-fncs-jeff-goldblatt-re-stacy-peterson/

I hope it works - sorry, I'm not too good at the posting links thing. :)

Here's a quote from the story. Tell me it's not creepy!:

"Fast forward to this morning: she awoke to find 50 photos taken at a graveyard (all 5 by 7s) scattered up and down her driveway and on her yard. She says there was a Christmas stocking attached to her mailbox, and inside her mailbox, a 3 page “letter”, which included a copy of a National Inquirer article on the Peterson case, a map of a cemetary in Lynwood, IL (which is where the Inquirer speculated that Stacy’s body has been dumped), and a rambling letter that among other things, told Sharon that “this is where you can find her.”

Bychowski called police. 2 squad cars and an evidence technician responded and took a police report. I’m still awaiting a response from police on this matter."

What an odd coincidence that this letter says that Lynwood is where Stacy's body will be found. Good memory, Justice Dawg!

Fallen Angel

05-29-2008, 12:19 PM

Originally posted by Justice_Dawg
That map left at the neighbors was to a cemetary in Lynwood, IL
Remember that? [/*]Yepppppp i remember that:eek:

Fallen Angel

05-29-2008, 12:20 PM

did anyone see this?

Will Travolta Help Get Drew Peterson Off?

Drew Peterson -- the ex-cop who's a suspect in the killing of an ex-wife and being investigated in the drowning of another -- could be getting some legal help from an unlikely (and unwitting) source: Scientolobig John Travolta.

http://www.tmz.com/2008/05/29/will-travolta-help-get-drew-peterson-off/

Jpanda

05-29-2008, 12:25 PM

Originally posted by Fallen Angel
did anyone see this?

Will Travolta Help Get Drew Peterson Off?

Drew Peterson -- the ex-cop who's a suspect in the killing of an ex-wife and being investigated in the drowning of another -- could be getting some legal help from an unlikely (and unwitting) source: Scientolobig John Travolta.

http://www.tmz.com/2008/05/29/will-travolta-help-get-drew-peterson-off/ [/*]

I saw that on the news this morning. He still could have had the gun illegally. I don't think it proves anything, IMO.

I still stand behind LE and think they should charge DP every single time he breaks the law.....that includes jaywalking.

jmo

Fallen Angel

05-29-2008, 12:29 PM

Originally posted by Jpanda

I saw that on the news this morning. He still could have had the gun illegally. I don't think it proves anything, IMO.

I still stand behind LE and think they should charge DP every single time he breaks the law.....that includes jaywalking.

jmo [/*]:beer: ITA

Land Shark®

05-29-2008, 12:30 PM

At the least, the Travlolta photo proves Drew was indeed in possession of an illegal firearm as far back as 2000.

I understand why Travolta would have needed protection while filming Battlefield Earth.

It's one of the worst films of all time. :biggrin:

Fallen Angel

05-29-2008, 12:32 PM

Jpanda

05-29-2008, 12:34 PM

Originally posted by Land Shark®
At the least, the Travlolta photo proves Drew was indeed in possession of an illegal firearm as far back as 2000.

I understand why Travolta would have needed protection while filming Battlefield Earth.

It's one of the worst films of all time. :biggrin: [/*]

Ha, I never saw it, but I doubt I ever will since you think it's one of the worst films of all time!

I wonder how Travolta would feel now, considering that a murder suspect was supposedly protecting him. I know I'd be a little creeped out.

jmo

kimmy56

05-29-2008, 01:06 PM

YNWOOD (WLS) -- Police in south suburban Lynwood are trying to identify human remains found on a farm.
A farmer found bones scattered around his field.
Investigators believe animals probably moved them around.
The body is a male.

http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&id=6172212

no1what

05-29-2008, 03:07 PM

Originally posted by kimmy56
YNWOOD (WLS) -- Police in south suburban Lynwood are trying to identify human remains found on a farm.
A farmer found bones scattered around his field.
Investigators believe animals probably moved them around.
The body is a male.

http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&id=6172212 [/*]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

IMO what would be really coincidental is if this male body was placed there back in Oct. 2007. That would make the psychic a little on track but with the wrong victim.

Justice_Dawg

05-29-2008, 07:54 PM

Originally posted by no1what

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

IMO what would be really coincidental is if this male body was placed there back in Oct. 2007. That would make the psychic a little on track but with the wrong victim. [/*]

This says this past summer or fall.
:eek:

Link to thread (http://boards.insessiontrials.com/showthread.php?threadid=332123)

That would be so weird!

SoggyBayou

05-30-2008, 12:59 AM

http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/heraldnews/news/977864,jo29_peterson_web.article

Wow, did not take long for the GJ to want to talk to her.

treetime

05-30-2008, 01:03 AM

peterson will be in jail within a month

:patriot:

treetime

05-30-2008, 01:04 AM

peterson makes me barf

Justice_Dawg

05-30-2008, 08:09 AM

Originally posted by treetime
peterson will be in jail within a month

:patriot: [/*]
Can we Bank on it?

;)

Land Shark®

05-30-2008, 08:47 AM

Originally posted by SoggyBayou
http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/heraldnews/news/977864,jo29_peterson_web.article

Wow, did not take long for the GJ to want to talk to her.

That's for sure.

From the link:

“You guys ruined it for me, again,” Peterson, 54, said of his romance with 22-year-old tanning salon worker Kim Matuska.

“It’s too much for her,” said Peterson, whose 24-year-old wife, Stacy, has been missing since October. “You got producers trying to get her on television shows, the state police, grand juries. It’s too much.”

So much, Peterson said, that he has become rather pessimistic about his prospects with the fairer sex.

~End Quote~

I sincerely hope Drew's love affair with the media is over.

But I doubt it.

IfIMay

05-30-2008, 09:46 AM

Another reason to avoid tanning salons. The radiation apparently makes Drew Peterson appear attractive in some way.

barf

Justice_Dawg

05-30-2008, 09:49 AM

Originally posted by IfIMay
Another reason to avoid tanning salons. The radiation apparently makes Drew Peterson appear attractive in some way.

barf [/*]
That teeny-bopper just wanted him for money and a boob job.

:biggrin:

newbiee

05-30-2008, 10:18 AM

Morning!

Joe Hosey said that the 22 year old and Drew were dating, right? Isn't that the person that is writing a book about Drew? Didn't Joel say there was nothing going on between the two of them? Now I'll have to go research....

kimmy56

05-30-2008, 10:36 AM

Wow, did not take long for the GJ to want to talk to her. [/*][/QUOTE]snipped

Stacy Peterson's aunt talks to grand jury

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-drew-peterson_30may30,0,5122397.story

This story focuses on the aunt, her testimony, and her visit at DP's house to see the kids rather than the lesser important story by Joe Hosed focusing on little Kimmy.

no1what

05-30-2008, 11:20 AM

Originally posted by Justice_Dawg

That teeny-bopper just wanted him for money and a boob job.

:biggrin: [/*]
---------------------------------------------------------------------

IMO she just wanted her 5 minutes of fame.

Jpanda

05-30-2008, 11:25 AM

Originally posted by no1what

---------------------------------------------------------------------

IMO she just wanted her 5 minutes of fame. [/*]

I completely agree. Makes me sick, personally. barf

kimmy56

05-30-2008, 11:28 AM

Originally posted by Jpanda

I completely agree. Makes me sick, personally. barf [/*]

Well, when you think about, what kind of person is going to get involved with a guy like DP? Exactly this kind of person.

no1what

05-30-2008, 11:54 AM

Originally posted by kimmy56

Well, when you think about, what kind of person is going to get involved with a guy like DP? Exactly this kind of person. [/*]

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Well when you think about what does it say about an older man that only wants to date younger women?

kimmy56

05-30-2008, 11:56 AM

Originally posted by no1what

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Well when you think about what does it say about an older man that only wants to date younger women? [/*]

Exactly.

kimmy56

05-30-2008, 12:22 PM

Originally posted by gerald1
Speaking for some older men IMO it says:beer: [/*]

you would think thatbarf

kimmy56

05-30-2008, 12:39 PM

Jpanda

05-30-2008, 12:48 PM

Originally posted by gerald1
What, when, where and how did she become a victim. What about Drew's rights of innocence until proven quilty. Don't you believe in the American way? IMO at this stage he is the only real victim in this whole matter.:rose: for Drew and the American way.:cool: [/*]

IMO Stacy became a victim when LE declared her missing as a "potential homicide," and when they declared her husband the suspect in her disappearance.

I'm all for innocent until proven guilty, and DP is just that in the legal system, but in my mind I feel that he is guilty.

jmo

Land Shark®

05-30-2008, 12:59 PM

Originally posted by gerald1

snipped

What about Drew's rights of innocence until proven quilty.

snipped

Drew's right of innocence until proven guilty will begin as soon as he walks into a courtroom for his trial.

The courtroom is the only place where Drew has that right. :cool:

Land Shark®

05-30-2008, 01:01 PM

Originally posted by gerald1
:confused: Do you not like George Clooney, Harrison Ford, Michael Douglas and a host of others?

I haven't heard of any of the people listed above being suspected of murder. Times two. :cool:

no1what

05-30-2008, 01:45 PM

Originally posted by no1what

-----------------------------------------------------------------

I guess I missed that piece of information. Do you have a link?

IMO Stacy would be so proud of everyone here who is defending her rights as a victim. [/*]

Originally posted by gerald1
What, when, where and how did she become a victim. What about Drew's rights of innocence until proven quilty. Don't you believe in the American way? IMO at this stage he is the only real victim in this whole matter.:rose: for Drew and the American way.:cool: [/*]

------------------------------------------------------------

What, when, where and how did Drew become a victim. What is your proof that Drew is a victim?

Land Shark®

05-30-2008, 01:58 PM

Originally posted by no1what

respectfully snipped

What, when, where and how did Drew become a victim. What is your proof that Drew is a victim?

Drew is only a victim of the consequences of his own crimes. IMO.

And rightfully so.

kimmy56

05-30-2008, 03:56 PM

Originally posted by gerald1
Public scrutiny, constant harassment by the incompetent BBPD, trumped up phony gun charges, young wife ran off and left him, and on, and on, and on. [/*]

All brought on by his OWN actions.

kimmy56

05-30-2008, 04:39 PM

Originally posted by gerald1
So what if he's the only suspect. A spouse is allways the first person the police look at in these domestic cases. If they don't happen to like the person, as in this case, they often look no further. They turn the suspect into a victim of their incompetence. There is a possibility that Stacy could be in hiding. At this stage all she is, is a missing person. Whether it's her choice or not remains to be seen. Since all we can do is deal in the realm of speculation it's also reasonable that she may feel she is in trouble with the police for not comming forward sooner. It's happened before in other cases. IMO you also have to look at the competency of the police in the State of Ill. It wasn't that long ago that the Ill. governor declared a halt to the carrying out of death penality sentences. Why? The no. of those who had been proven to have been wrongfully convicted had begun to grow at an alarming rate. [/*]

1. Who said the police didn't like him? They stuck by him through Kathleen. Why would they turn on him now?
2. You are disproving your own point - if there have been so many false convictions at the State of IL then the police will make extra sure that their investigation is totally on the up and up. They will cross all t's and dot all i's. They will not just go after DP because they don't like him or it's easier. If anything, the halt to the death penalty has brought about more responsible investigating.
3. If we are speculating, then we have to look at ALL of the information there is. You cannot ignore that the majority of wives are killed by their husbands/boyfriends. You cannot ignore that DP has a history of abuse towards his wives/girlfriends. The rules of deduction point you to him as the probably suspect. Add to this the more responsible investigations brought about by Gov. Ryan's halt to the death penalty because of false convictions and, IMO, you have to agree that the police are investigating the correct person and they are completing a responsible investigation.

no1what

05-30-2008, 04:45 PM

IMO Drew only gets the attention that he wants.

Lyndawitha"Y

05-30-2008, 05:41 PM

Originally posted by Land Shark®

That's for sure.

From the link:

“You guys ruined it for me, again,” Peterson, 54, said of his romance with 22-year-old tanning salon worker Kim Matuska.

“It’s too much for her,” said Peterson, whose 24-year-old wife, Stacy, has been missing since October. “You got producers trying to get her on television shows, the state police, grand juries. It’s too much.”

So much, Peterson said, that he has become rather pessimistic about his prospects with the fairer sex.

~End Quote~

I sincerely hope Drew's love affair with the media is over.

But I doubt it. [/*]

Oh my good gooses..Poor Drew..and all this coming from the guy who planned to have a game show with himself as the prize..i hope any future young women learn from this gal's experience..He is a guy you deffinaately want to stay away from..he's damaged goods, not to mention a threat your health and welfare..

LMS
hammer

no1what

05-30-2008, 06:48 PM

I was wondering what type of person would date a potentially dangerous person? (not mentioning any names)

Wouldn't that be like walking in front of speeding vehicle or into the line of fire. Or maybe like trying to kiss a grizzly or sleep with a cobra?

And if you were a potentially dangerous person what do you think about the people that want to date you. Do you think they think their asking for it so that might make it ok?

Just curious. Any thoughts?

Jpanda

05-30-2008, 06:52 PM

Originally posted by no1what
I was wondering what type of person would date a potentially dangerous person? (not mentioning any names)

Wouldn't that be like walking in front of speeding vehicle or into the line of fire. Or maybe like trying to kiss a grizzly or sleep with a cobra?

And if you were a potentially dangerous person what do you think about the people that want to date you. Do you think they think their asking for it so that might make it ok?

Just curious. Any thoughts? [/*]

I'm puzzled by what kind of person would date a murder suspect, as well. It's insane. Maybe they get off on the "thrill?" That would be my only guess because nothing else makes sense!

And if I WERE the dangerous person, I would probably prey on weak/passive individuals. I think that's what Drew does, IMO.

All JMO

MsBrown408

05-30-2008, 10:02 PM

From another article

http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/EndUser?Action=UserDisplayFullDocument&orgId=574&topicId=100020825&docId=l:799663492&start=1

"Peterson blamed media and police scrutiny of the young woman for sinking their budding relationship. And he's pessimistic about future romance.

"I don't think I could get laid in a women's prison with a handful of pardons," he said Thursday"

That has a MAJOR ewwwww factor to it. :punch: Drew P.

Land Shark®

05-31-2008, 01:05 AM

Originally posted by gerald1

snipped

3. Other than heresay, gossip and innuendo I have no knowledge of how he treated his wives/girlfriends.

snipped

One of his ex-wives has been interviewed about the abuse Drew forced upon her.

She was directly involved.

Which throws 'hearsay, gossip, and innuendo' out the window. :cool:

Anakerie

05-31-2008, 11:29 AM

Wow... I wonder what they can get from that bathtub after all this time...

Detectives Take Bathtub Where Savio Died
Drew Peterson's 3rd Wife's Death Was Reclassified As Homicide Earlier This Year
http://cbs2chicago.com/local/kathleen.savio.bathtub.2.737388.html

Anakerie

05-31-2008, 05:00 PM

Have you guys seen the picture of Drew with John Travolta that the PR guy released? :rolleyes:

http://www.prnewschannel.com/absolutenm/templates/?a=567&z=4

According to the PR guy and Brodsky, that photo is going to help them get Drew off on the weapons charges...

"This photo should convince the state police that they've made a mistake with these charges," says Joel A. Brodsky, Peterson's criminal defense attorney. "If not we might need to subpoena Mr. Travolta when this case goes to court," Brodsky says jokingly.

The photo of Peterson and Travolta was taken in Bolingbrook when Sgt. Peterson was assigned to offer police protection to Mr. Travolta when he was in town on a book signing tour promoting the movie Battlefield Earth.

I don't see how this photo can really prove anything. You can't tell which gun Drew's holding... All I see is a picture of Drew watching Travolta sign an autograph for another cop who's also got a gun... Big whoop... Sometimes I really wonder about Drew, his lawyer AND the PR guy... lol

no1what

05-31-2008, 05:21 PM

Originally posted by Anakerie
Have you guys seen the picture of Drew with John Travolta that the PR guy released? :rolleyes:

http://www.prnewschannel.com/absolutenm/templates/?a=567&z=4

According to the PR guy and Brodsky, that photo is going to help them get Drew off on the weapons charges...

"This photo should convince the state police that they've made a mistake with these charges," says Joel A. Brodsky, Peterson's criminal defense attorney. "If not we might need to subpoena Mr. Travolta when this case goes to court," Brodsky says jokingly.

The photo of Peterson and Travolta was taken in Bolingbrook when Sgt. Peterson was assigned to offer police protection to Mr. Travolta when he was in town on a book signing tour promoting the movie Battlefield Earth.

I don't see how this photo can really prove anything. You can't tell which gun Drew's holding... All I see is a picture of Drew watching Travolta sign an autograph for another cop who's also got a gun... Big whoop... Sometimes I really wonder about Drew, his lawyer AND the PR guy... lol [/*]

----------------------------------------------------------------

IMO Maybe:
1. he was holding someone else's gun because they were in the porta john
2. he borrowed a gun that day from the swat team department
3. he was using an illegal gun while on duty
4. It's not the same gun in question

IMO The picture can't prove anything.

north-eh

05-31-2008, 05:24 PM

lol, yes I have said the same thing myself, can't tell what type of gun he's holding, it's not a clear photo. The other one I saw had a stamp underneath it that it was released by Drew's PR guy. Anyhow, I doubt very much that Mr. Travolta would appreciate being subpoened to help Drew in any kind of case. Interesting, to say the least.;)
N

kimmy56

05-31-2008, 06:01 PM

Hey Paula

06-01-2008, 10:01 AM

Originally posted by Anakerie
Wow... I wonder what they can get from that bathtub after all this time...

Detectives Take Bathtub Where Savio Died
Drew Peterson's 3rd Wife's Death Was Reclassified As Homicide Earlier This Year
http://cbs2chicago.com/local/kathleen.savio.bathtub.2.737388.html [/*]

I think it might be related to the size and shape of the bathtub and the position of Kathy Savio's body to prove murder vs accident.

If the bathtub merely contained DNA evidence, it wouldn't have been necessary to seize it.

I wouldn't be surprised if the bathtub were brought into the courtroom at trial.

IMO

Hey Paula

06-01-2008, 10:04 AM

Originally posted by litchfield29

You're right. I think the guy is a skunk, but until they can prove he is guilty of harming or murdering either of his last two wives, he is presumed innocent, not only by me, but the law. This is why we have a judicial system in place.

my opinions [/*]

The presumption of innocence only applies in a court of law. If that weren't true, no one would ever be arrested because everyone would be presumed innocent.

IMO

Anakerie

06-01-2008, 07:27 PM

I just ran across another "news" item from Brodsky... Crocodile tear time:

Death Threats Constant for Drew Peterson
http://www.wbbm780.com/Death-Threats-Constant-for-Drew-Peterson/2287102

IMO, if Drew hadn't behaved the way he has from the beginning, back when Stacy first disappeared, the alleged "death threats" wouldn't be so numerous (If they really are. I have to take a lot of what Brodsky says with a huge grain of salt.)

If Drew had shown any kind of concern for his missing wife instead of parading around with his bandit bandanna and hat making sick jokes to the media there might have been more "sympathy" for him.

If Drew hadn't slammed his missing wife (and his other 3 wives!) so many times whenever a camera or microphone was pointed his direction, perhaps there would be more "sympathy" for him.

Drew has generated the "hatred" for himself, by himself, for the most part. As both Drew and Brodsky have said, "sinister sells", so Drew has painted a very "sinister" image of himself to fit the bill. And, up until the weapons charges were filed, he was gleefully selling his "sinister" image. Funny that we haven't seen nor heard the "sinister" stuff since he got arrested....

Hey Paula

06-01-2008, 09:45 PM

Originally posted by mcannie1965

It's the Red Queen approach to Alice In Wonderland: Verdict now, trial later. The trial comes after the jury pool has been poisoned by the court of public opinion.

When people are arrested, there is a "presumption of innocence," or there would be no trial.

mho [/*]

If LE were to presume everyone innocent, there would be no trials because no one would ever be arrested for any crime. If we were to presume everyone innocent on these message boards, discussion would be limited, mechanical, insincere and universal.

In general, juries are fairer, wiser and more diligent than some think. Most take their responsibility and duty seriously and don't want to convict anyone unless they truly believe that person is guilty, regardless of public opinion.

IMO

Land Shark®

06-01-2008, 10:41 PM

Originally posted by mcannie1965

snipped

When people are arrested, there is a "presumption of innocence," or there would be no trial.

mho

When people are arrested, there is a presumption of guilt.

Hence the arrest.

'Presumption of innocence' begins at trial.

In the courtroom.

And only in the courtroom.

Land Shark®

06-01-2008, 10:48 PM

Originally posted by mcannie1965

snipped

It is my opinion, that there should be no public opinion on the guilt of a person until after the verdict...or acquittal. It will come to that one day.

snipped
mho

It will never come to that in the United States of America.

Never.

Land Shark®

06-01-2008, 10:57 PM

Originally posted by mcannie1965

No, there is not a presumption of guilt when people are arrested--not in a court of law. If this was the case, the proscution wouldn't need to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and the defense wouldn't need to prove it's case beyond a reasonable doubt.
mho

snipped

I have no idea what country you're in but here in the United States of America the defense has absolutlely no responsibility to prove anything beyond a reasonable doubt.

Here in the U.S.A., the defense need not even put on a case.

Here in the U.S.A., the burden of proof is on the prosecution.

And only on the prosecution.

Land Shark®

06-01-2008, 11:02 PM

Originally posted by mcannie1965

Yes, it will.

mho

All I can do is bring your attention to the Constitution of The United States of America.

I can't make anyone understand the document. :shrug:

Hey Paula

06-01-2008, 11:12 PM

Originally posted by mcannie1965

I am not talking about jurors that are fairer, wiser and more diligent. I am talking about jury pools poisoned in the court of public opinion.

We are innocent until/unless proven guilty. I do not believe a future jury pool can presume a person guilty and then suddenly give the defendant a presumption of innocence. The court of public opinion make it very, very difficult to find a fair, wise, and diligent jury. The odds of finding a jury pool not poisoned by public opinion in a high profile case, hard to find. It shouldn't be that hard to find a untainted jury pool. It should be a given.

It is my opinion, that there should be no public opinion on the guilt of a person until after the verdict...or acquittal. It will come to that one day. Wouldn't you want for yourself or a loved one a jury pool not poisoned by public opinion? I would for myself and a loved one.

If a person is not presumed innocent in a court of law, there would be no need for a trial. And there would be no need for the prosecution to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This only occurs when there is a presumption of innocence.

mho [/*]

I don't believe jury pools are poisoned by public opinion, even though lawyers will argue it to obtain COVs and request dismissals of their cases. Freedom to think for ourselves and form our own opinions is cherished, and a celebration of our individuality.

What you are suggesting defies human nature and the human thought process. This might work for robots or androids, but not human beings.

What constitutes public opinion? Is the entire Nation polled on each issue? I don't think they are. To my mind, that would be the only true measure of public opinion. I think the media controls most of what is perceived as public opinion, not the people in general.

IMO

Land Shark®

06-01-2008, 11:38 PM

Originally posted by mcannie1965

snipped

Yes, the defense does need to prove it's case beyond a reasonable doubt.

mho

It doesn't really matter how many times you post the above untruth.

It will never be true.

Not in the U.S.A.. :patriot:

Land Shark®

06-02-2008, 12:23 AM

Originally posted by mcannie1965

It doesn't matter how many times I post it, it doesn't make it an untruth.

It is true. In the U.S.A:patriot:

mho

It could be left unwritten, unposted, & unsaid.

It will always be untrue.

Any defense lawyer in America will tell you exacty the same.

The defense doesn't need to prove anything.

No 'IMO' here.

It's fact. ;)

And it always will be. In the U.S.A.. :patriot:

Anakerie

06-02-2008, 02:51 AM

Stacy & Drew: The Irony of Legacies
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/63692

Drew Peterson--The Media Hound;
Drew Peterson--The Dating Game;
Drew Peterson--New Celebrity on eBay…

Drew Peterson: The Bored Game.

Isn´t his 15 minutes of fame up? Now he´s signing things? Is there no ceiling to his height of bad taste?

More at the link.....

aubrey04

06-02-2008, 03:00 AM

Originally posted by no1what

----------------------------------------------------------------

IMO Maybe:
1. he was holding someone else's gun because they were in the porta john
2. he borrowed a gun that day from the swat team department
3. he was using an illegal gun while on duty
4. It's not the same gun in question

IMO The picture can't prove anything. [/*]

The issue to me is the fact that the gun had been modified and the barrel of the gun was shortened, according to police. The picture really doesn't prove anything to me. Even IF the gun that Drew is being charged with - is the same as the gun in the picture.. That doesn't mean squat.

He could have modified it AFTER the picture was taken.

Also, I do NOT trust Brodsky one bit ---- this gun could be a completely different one that he got arrested for.

I have watched Brodsky dance around questions and give out far-fetched conspiracy theories too many times to believe ANYTHING he says.

aubrey04

06-02-2008, 03:16 AM

Originally posted by Land Shark®

Drew's right of innocence until proven guilty will begin as soon as he walks into a courtroom for his trial.

The courtroom is the only place where Drew has that right. :cool: [/*]

I completely agree with you. The presumption of innocence is for the COURTROOM, not public opinion. We are all entitled to our opinions on guilt or innocence based on the information has given out to the media, plus Brodsky and DP's own actions and interviews. And interviews by both Stacy and Kathleen's family.

Courtroom verdicts do NOT erase history -- OJ is still guilty (IMO) - even if the jury handed down a "not guilty" verdict.

And there have been numerous convictions and verdict overturned -- who were actually innocent of their crime. (IE- Cynthia Sommer and Clarence Harrison are probably two of the most famous cases like that).

12r average Joe, civilian jury members decide the fate of the accused and whether they are "guilty" or "not guilty" but it doesn't rewrite history. The jury members must abide by the "innocent until proven guilty".. not everyone else.

aubrey04

06-02-2008, 03:28 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by mcannie1965

snipped

It is my opinion, that there should be no public opinion on the guilt of a person until after the verdict...or acquittal. It will come to that one day.

snipped
mho
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**************************************************

Originally posted by Land Shark®

It will never come to that in the United States of America.

Never. [/*]

You're right -- it will NEVER happen because we have the 1st amendment that allows - "freedom of speech". Unless the gov't decides to do away with the 1st amendment -- then the public can express their opinion on whether someone is guilty or not.

I think the odds of the gov't pulling the first amendment and halting our "freedom of speech" aren't very good. I think getting hit my lightening 10 times in your life time is more likely to happen than the govt yanking "freedom of speech".

no1what

06-02-2008, 10:14 AM

IMO it feels as though it is always the victim who is on trial. The victim is at the mercy of the court, the jury and prosecutor to fight for their rights. It seems that the victim is the one who never gets a fair trial because there are two many pieces of evidence that are not allowed in court for various reasons.

IMO the jury never really hears all testimony or knows the existence of key evidence which makes it harder for them to come up with a fair verdict.

Land Shark®

06-02-2008, 11:30 AM

Land Shark®

06-02-2008, 01:21 PM

Originally posted by gerald1
I did and they are absolutely correct and very clear.

snipped

If the Constitution of The United States of America ceased to exist.... then and only then would mccannie1965 be correct. :cool:

north-eh

06-02-2008, 07:02 PM

Originally posted by mcannie1965

No, that is not what I said. Not on every citizen in America. On public forums and media reports. The media in Canada and in England and public forums cannot discuss a case until after the verdict.

A law will be passed that will gag discussion of the case in the media until after the verdict.

Again, yes, 'IMO' here.

It will happen.

mho [/*]

In Canada we can discuss criminal cases before a verdict in forums and on message boards, if this is jist of your post? Cameras are NOT permitted in courtrooms, much to the dismay of a lot of us IMO.
N

aubrey04

06-02-2008, 08:55 PM

Originally posted by mcannie1965

It's not denying "Freedom of Speech." It's delaying it until the defendant has a fair and untainted public opinion trial.

A "gag" order denies "Freedom of Speech" until the judge lifts the "gag." This would be no different--except it would be lifted after the verdict...or acquittal. Then "opinions" on "guilt" can be publically expressed.

mho [/*]

Like that's gonna happen. LOL.

A gag order usually involves the parties involved with the crime --- all the lawyers, defendant(s), the families involved, etc.

NOT the general public. IMO- there is no way to shut down American citizens from expressing their opinion on a case, whether they be on TV, on the internet, or discussing cases with your neighbors... Or the media's right to report on it.

If someone in the govt tried to do that --- I guarantee it would be a cause a HUGE stink. Citizens do NOT like having their personal freedoms taken away --- and our voice/opinions is personal freedom that citizens take VERY seriously.

north-eh

06-02-2008, 09:04 PM

Originally posted by gerald1
Maybe they just like his stuff. They took the gun. Now the bathtub. Who knows what's next. [/*]

He maybe next! mo
N

aubrey04

06-02-2008, 09:15 PM

Originally posted by Hey Paula

I think it might be related to the size and shape of the bathtub and the position of Kathy Savio's body to prove murder vs accident.

If the bathtub merely contained DNA evidence, it wouldn't have been necessary to seize it.

I wouldn't be surprised if the bathtub were brought into the courtroom at trial.

IMO [/*]

Bringing in a bathtub to court wouldn't entirely surprise me. There was a famous case in Houston --- where a lady, Susan Wright, who tied up her husband on their bed and then stabbed him 192 times. The proseuctor, Kelly Siegler, hauled the entire bed into the courtroom, complete with the blood matress.. and then proceeded to re-enact what she thought happened.

It was a bit bizarre - to say the least. I just was looking for info on this case and realized that it had been shown on CTV in 2004.. I had no clue, as I didn't start watching CTV until the end of 2006...weird.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Lucille_Wright

Anyway -- nothing would surprise me anymore - when it comes to murder trials.

wandering

06-02-2008, 11:38 PM

On GVS right now. Greta said coming up, a new piece of evidence in this case.

wandering

06-02-2008, 11:44 PM

Police seized the bathtub. It's in storage. Possibly looking for DNA on it.

One of Kathleen's sisters appeared before the GJ. Also the 22 year old that has been involved with DP.

wandering

06-02-2008, 11:47 PM

Baden on now, he says it indicates that the GJ is seriously considering an indictment.

He says the bathtub is important, because of the bruises on Kathleen, and how they got there.

He stated emphatically that this is a homicide.

aubrey04

06-03-2008, 12:25 AM

Originally posted by wandering
Baden on now, he says it indicates that the GJ is seriously considering an indictment.

He says the bathtub is important, because of the bruises on Kathleen, and how they got there.

He stated emphatically that this is a homicide. [/*]

I believe the police are very serious about all of this. Removing a bathtub is no small task. I believe the dimensions of the bathtub are what is of interest to investigators. Could the fall in that bathtub result in the bruises she had on her body?

Interesting that he says the GJ is seriously considering an indictment.

Hey Paula

06-03-2008, 08:21 AM

Originally posted by wandering
Police seized the bathtub. It's in storage. Possibly looking for DNA on it.

One of Kathleen's sisters appeared before the GJ. Also the 22 year old that has been involved with DP. [/*]

I don't know what kind of DNA evidence they hope to find in the bathtub. They already know KS bled, and since DP once lived in the same house and used that bathtub too, finding his DNA won't really prove anything, IMO.

I still believe the tub was removed and is being held as evidence to prove KS didn't die accidentally from injuring herself in the bathtub, and that the position of her body in that tub is evidence of murder not an accident. That bathtub might very well be hauled into the courtroom once the trial begins, and I do believe Drew Peterson will be charged with Kathleen Savio's murder.

IMO

Hey Paula

06-03-2008, 08:26 AM

Originally posted by aubrey04

Bringing in a bathtub to court wouldn't entirely surprise me. There was a famous case in Houston --- where a lady, Susan Wright, who tied up her husband on their bed and then stabbed him 192 times. The proseuctor, Kelly Siegler, hauled the entire bed into the courtroom, complete with the blood matress.. and then proceeded to re-enact what she thought happened.

It was a bit bizarre - to say the least. I just was looking for info on this case and realized that it had been shown on CTV in 2004.. I had no clue, as I didn't start watching CTV until the end of 2006...weird.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Lucille_Wright

Anyway -- nothing would surprise me anymore - when it comes to murder trials. [/*]

I saw that reenactment too, and it truly was bizarre and weird. But it was effective. A picture (or reenactment) is worth a thousand words!

newbiee

06-03-2008, 11:03 AM

oops, posted wrong link!

http://tinyurl.com/4a94tc

no1what

06-03-2008, 11:14 AM

Originally posted by gerald1
Maybe they just like his stuff. They took the gun. Now the bathtub. Who knows what's next. [/*]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

It's their job to collect evidence.

Justice_Dawg

06-03-2008, 11:33 AM

I hope DP is shakin in his shoes. :biggrin:

kimmy56

06-03-2008, 11:48 AM

Originally posted by Justice_Dawg
I hope DP is shakin in his shoes. :biggrin: [/*]

If he is, I doubt he'll ever show it. He'll still have his arrogant, smart alecky demeanor that he puts on. However, he's been curiously quiet these last few days, hasn't he??? hee hee

witchywoman

06-03-2008, 11:49 AM

Originally posted by Justice_Dawg
I hope DP is shakin in his shoes. :biggrin: [/*]

I hope so to,mo

Justice_Dawg

06-03-2008, 11:54 AM

Originally posted by kimmy56

If he is, I doubt he'll ever show it. He'll still have his arrogant, smart alecky demeanor that he puts on. However, he's been curiously quiet these last few days, hasn't he??? hee hee [/*]
Yes he has. A person with even just part of a brain knows that bathtubs aren't taken from crime scenes for nothing. :eek:

:biggrin:

kimmy56

06-03-2008, 11:58 AM

I am trying to find the video or transcripts to what wandering said was on Greta last night. Did any one else see it?

MsBrown408

06-03-2008, 12:01 PM

Originally posted by Justice_Dawg

Yes he has. A person with even just part of a brain knows that bathtubs aren't taken from crime scenes for nothing. :eek:

:biggrin: [/*]

Very True, BUT it's only Tues. hee hee :D

north-eh

06-03-2008, 01:15 PM

Have no idea if this was posted before, but I sure hadn't seen it!
http://www.myspace.com/aginglothario
N:rolleyes:

no1what

06-03-2008, 01:18 PM

Originally posted by north-eh
Have no idea if this was posted before, but I sure hadn't seen it!
http://www.myspace.com/aginglothario
N:rolleyes: [/*]

-----------------------------------------------------------

I am not able to access this link. We have myspace blocked.

What is on the link?

kimmy56

06-03-2008, 01:30 PM

Originally posted by no1what

-----------------------------------------------------------

I am not able to access this link. We have myspace blocked.

What is on the link? [/*]

It's a cleverly done, over the top, bogus my space page for DP. Funny but tacky. (At least I hope this is not really his but he's so sleazy, I wouldn't put it past him!)

north-eh

06-03-2008, 01:30 PM

Originally posted by no1what

-----------------------------------------------------------

I am not able to access this link. We have myspace blocked.

What is on the link? [/*]

It's DP's myspace page. Has his likes and dislikes all set to music.
Lists some films he likes e.g. A Kiss Before Dying and Malice
Pretty sick stuff if you ask me. I don't know if that link was posted before, I hadn't seen it so I posted it anyway.
N

Land Shark®

06-03-2008, 01:31 PM

Originally posted by no1what

-----------------------------------------------------------

I am not able to access this link. We have myspace blocked.

What is on the link?

It's obviously a hoax page.

For the 'about me' section it says: 'Former police officer & bar owner. I love the ladies'.

For the 'who I'd like to meet' section it says: 'Highschool girls, Suri Cruise'.

For the 'general info' section it says: 'Bikes, barrels, babes, small planes, law enforcement'.

For the 'movies' section it says: 'A Kiss Before Dying, Malice'.

For the 'books' section it says: 'Police books & training materials, If I Did It by O.J. Simpson'.

For the 'heroes' section it says: 'Bill Wyman, Roman Polanski'.

Those last two... implying that Drew loves the young girls.

For the 'Here for' section it says: 'Networking, Dating, Serious Relationships, Friends'.

Oh yeah... the song that plays is 'Where Did You Sleep Last Night' by Leadbelly.

Jpanda

06-03-2008, 02:02 PM

Originally posted by newbiee
oops, posted wrong link!

http://tinyurl.com/4a94tc [/*]

That would be a HUGE break if Pastor Neil is able to testify about what Stacy told him. For me, that was one of the most compelling pieces of "evidence" I have heard so far regarding DP's guilt. After hearing the pastor tell his story on Greta, it gave me chills. Especially when the pastor came back from his meeting with Stacy to a voicemail from Drew, requesting to speak to him. Scary!!

JMO

aubrey04

06-03-2008, 06:13 PM

Originally posted by north-eh
Have no idea if this was posted before, but I sure hadn't seen it!
http://www.myspace.com/aginglothario
N:rolleyes: [/*]

OMG! I am still laughing -- my favorite part:

Books: Police books and training materials, "If I Did It" by OJ Simpson.

Who I'd like to meet:
high school girls, Suri Cruise

hahaha.. I am in tears, I am laughing so hard.

wandering

06-04-2008, 10:58 AM

Originally posted by kimmy56
I am trying to find the video or transcripts to what wandering said was on Greta last night. Did any one else see it? [/*]Apparently Greta doesn't post transcripts of everything. I did find this brief AP article about the bathtub.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,361761,00.html

kimmy56

06-04-2008, 02:10 PM

This isn't about personal preference - it's about making fun of a situation where a wife and mother is missing and her husband is the prime suspect in a homicide.

Anakerie

06-05-2008, 01:59 AM

According to the Chicago Tribune, Drew's son Steve now has "custody" of Drew's guns. Any bets on how long it will take for some of them to get back into Drew's hands?

Illinois State Police give Drew Peterson's guns to his son
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-peterson-both-05-jun05,0,4647485.story

no1what

06-05-2008, 10:18 AM

Originally posted by grammybear
I imagine Drew will have the guns back within a month.

jmoo [/*]

----------------------------------------------------------------

If this is true imo that would show that Drew doesn't have respect for his son.

Land Shark®

06-05-2008, 10:31 AM

Originally posted by gerald1

snipped

BTW a judge ordered the guns returned to DP.

snipped

Wrong again.

Do you have a continuous urge to post blatantly false information?

Unbelievable.

MsBrown408

06-05-2008, 10:56 AM

TBH if I was Steve I wouldn't want to be put in that position. UNLESS he didn't have a choice. hmmmmmm

Anakerie

06-05-2008, 02:18 PM

Stacy's brother out of prison
http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/heraldnews/news/peterson/989077,4_1_JO05_PETERSON_S1.article

kimmy56

06-05-2008, 02:29 PM

Originally posted by Anakerie
Stacy's brother out of prison
http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/heraldnews/news/peterson/989077,4_1_JO05_PETERSON_S1.article [/*]

"He got out last time, I took him to Alexander's for prime rib," Peterson said. "I treated the whole cast of characters, as usual."

Whatta guy, huh? And as usual, it's all about DP!

MsBrown408

06-05-2008, 02:30 PM

kimmy56

06-05-2008, 02:35 PM

Originally posted by MsBrown408

WOW Kimmy I was going to post the same thing. ME ME ME ME ME ME ME :tongue: [/*]

He's beyond unbelieveable.

Anakerie

06-05-2008, 02:46 PM

Originally posted by kimmy56

He's beyond unbelieveable. [/*]

lol, Drew wouldn't be Drew if he didn't pull out the "poor me" card to make himself the main attraction... It's all about him, doncha know... Everyone else lies about him, everyone else is crazy, drugged, drunk, etc... It's not his fault that he's been so "unlucky" in love... ***gag***

not.another

06-05-2008, 02:47 PM

Please correct me if i'm wrong. So, Drew will let a sex offender brother-in-law over to spend time with his children. But anyone else in Stacy's family is not allowed? Even for thanksgiving? What a winner!

Anakerie

06-05-2008, 02:59 PM

Originally posted by not.another
Please correct me if i'm wrong. So, Drew will let a sex offender brother-in-law over to spend time with his children. But anyone else in Stacy's family is not allowed? Even for thanksgiving? What a winner! [/*]

Yeah.. I caught that too and wondered about it... Drew is one very odd duck. At least he did allow the aunt from California to visit before she went before the GJ from what the news reported. I wonder if she was allowed to see them after her testimony...

kimmy56

06-05-2008, 04:27 PM

http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/63692

Stacy & Drew: The Irony of Legacies
Rebekah Price

I love this woman.

not.another

06-05-2008, 06:21 PM

Originally posted by kimmy56
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/63692

Stacy & Drew: The Irony of Legacies
Rebekah Price

I love this woman. [/*]

That was a very well written article. Gotta love one with a little humor behind it! She has him pegged imo.

Anakerie: My bet the reason he let Stacy's aunt see the kids is because she lives in California and will most likely be leaving soon never to bother him again. How thoughtful of him.

aubrey04

06-05-2008, 07:11 PM

Originally posted by gerald1
Kelly Siegler also teaches a course on how to slip questions in past a judge before the judge has a chance to overrule the question. She admits she cheats and is proud to conduct classes on how to cheat to young prosecutors. For verification go to the Houston Chronicle it's in her own words. Perhaps that's why she lost the election for the DA's Office. Her boss had to resign that office in disgrace. The case you mention is infamous not famous. :rolleyes: [/*]

Kelly Siegler is uhmmmm something else. She's the Nancy Grace of Houston. If you're a criminal -- she's the last prosecutor you'd want to be in the courtroom prosecuting you..

I just read that she resigned from the Prosecutor's office on May 9th, 2008. I didn't even realize that - I knew she lost the bid to run for DA but I didn't realize she stepped down.

I am surprised a steam of air didn't blow my house over on May 9th-- when criminals exhaled a huge sigh of relief after she stepped down.

OT: It's Thursday, June 5th, someone needs to ask Drew Peterson where Stacy's body is.

aubrey04

06-05-2008, 07:28 PM

Originally posted by kimmy56

"He got out last time, I took him to Alexander's for prime rib," Peterson said. "I treated the whole cast of characters, as usual."

Whatta guy, huh? And as usual, it's all about DP! [/*]

I see the writer is Joe Hosey. Does Suburban Chicago News give ALL the Drew Peterson stories to Hosey?

That quote from Drew Peterson --- is so ... well, Drew Peterson. His sarcastic little quips are endless.

.. but this is weird. Why would Stacy's brother want to talk to Peterson?

Stacy's husband, embattled ex-Bolingbrook cop Drew Peterson, however, said his brother-in-law, Yelton Cales, has spoken to him a few times over the course of Cales' most recent incarceration. He said Cales called him and "just wanted to talk and stuff" and that he last heard from him "about a month ago."

Then it goes on to say that he would agree to let Yelton visit the kids, "It's going to be supervised, of course" -- says Peterson

tallcoolone

06-05-2008, 07:40 PM

Originally posted by gerald1
: *snipped*If you happened to watch a recent Sunday broadcast of 60 mins. there was a story depicting how over the top some police officers are willing to go in order to secure a conviction. Some were willing to lie, falsify reports, plant evidence, withhold evidence, unlawful search and seizures, and intimidate witnesses. One Sgt. was even willing to murder a couple of witnesses. All in the State of Ill. :( *unsnipped*[/*]Hmmmm........ is this former police Sgt. Drew Peterson of Illinois you're describing here?

MsBrown408

06-05-2008, 08:12 PM

Originally posted by tallcoolone
Hmmmm........ is this former police Sgt. Drew Peterson of Illinois you're describing here? [/*]

You mean that some were willing to lie, falsify reports, plant evidence, withhold evidence, unlawful search and seizures, and intimidate witnesses. even willing to murder a couple of witnesses.

To be honest a couple of those are still up in the air. I'm just waiting "To hear the rest of the story" ;)

Anakerie

06-05-2008, 08:29 PM

Originally posted by Kathy*Rae

Wht do you know! He got one right....

http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/heraldnews/news/peterson/989077,4_1_JO05_PETERSON_S1.article
From the article:

Guns given to son
Also Wednesday, Peterson's son, Oak Brook cop Stephen Peterson, took possession of eight firearms seized by state police as evidence in their investigation of Stacy's disappearance.
After confiscating the guns, the state police revoked Peterson's firearm owner's identification card, forcing him to transfer the weapons to his son's possession.

"I'm glad to see the police have finally complied with the court order," said Peterson's attorney, Joel Brodsky [/*]

No, he didn't get one right. The guns were not given to Drew. They were handed over to Drew's son. According to that poster, the judge ordered the guns returned to Drew and that is wrong. Drew does not have an FOID card. He can not be in possession of those guns by law which is why the judge ordered the guns be given to Drew's son Steve..

not.another: I think you are probably right.

unclezeek

06-05-2008, 09:25 PM

Originally posted by Anakerie

No, he didn't get one right. The guns were not given to Drew. They were handed over to Drew's son. According to that poster, the judge ordered the guns returned to Drew and that is wrong. Drew does not have an FOID card. He can not be in possession of those guns by law which is why the judge ordered the guns be given to Drew's son Steve..

not.another: I think you are probably right. [/*]Looking at trhe list, several of those guns are colletors items, that could be fired, but a couple turns of a scredriver

aubrey04

06-05-2008, 11:40 PM

Originally posted by kimmy56
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/63692

Stacy & Drew: The Irony of Legacies
Rebekah Price

I love this woman. [/*]

Exact link and great blog entry. I can not disagree with one word she wrote. She did a great job.

TY for posting that.

:patriot:

Mayasmimi

06-06-2008, 01:23 AM

Originally posted by kimmy56
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/63692

Stacy & Drew: The Irony of Legacies
Rebekah Price

I love this woman. [/*]

Excellent!!!! Wow!

newbiee

06-06-2008, 09:34 AM

Morning all.

sure hope something will break soon. I wander of Yelton will be talking to the media regarding Stacy. It will be interesting to hear what he says.

Justice_Dawg

06-06-2008, 09:37 AM

Originally posted by Anakerie

No, he didn't get one right. The guns were not given to Drew. They were handed over to Drew's son. According to that poster, the judge ordered the guns returned to Drew and that is wrong. Drew does not have an FOID card. He can not be in possession of those guns by law which is why the judge ordered the guns be given to Drew's son Steve..

not.another: I think you are probably right. [/*]

What judge would do that? I have never heard of things being "returned" to family members.

Odd.

Anakerie

06-06-2008, 10:50 AM

Originally posted by Justice_Dawg

What judge would do that? I have never heard of things being "returned" to family members.

Odd. [/*]

It was a Will County judge, Judge Richard Schoenstedt.

Police return Drew's guns -- to his son
http://www.suntimes.com/news/peterson/989406,CST-NWS-boling05.article

no1what

06-09-2008, 11:36 AM

Any news from the weekend? It seemed everything was really quite but maybe there was something I missed.

newbiee

06-09-2008, 11:50 AM

Originally posted by no1what
Any news from the weekend? It seemed everything was really quite but maybe there was something I missed. [/*]

As far as I know, nothing new to report.:(

watchu

06-09-2008, 11:57 AM

Let me add a little information about the bathtub.... I have a model that looks very similar. All the edges are rounded, so it would be hard to get bruises if you slipped and fell. Also, it is a deep, soaking tub. I'm 5'2" and I can see no way to drown in this tub.

I think obtaining the tub is more about being able to show jurors the strange position she was found in, than trying to find and dna......

....Is this the quiet before the storm? I feel an indictment in the works.....

newbiee

06-09-2008, 12:06 PM

Maybe it is quiet before the storm. I would hope so.

Seems it's quiet everywhere today.

Anakerie

06-09-2008, 01:47 PM

Originally posted by newbiee
Maybe it is quiet before the storm. I would hope so.

Seems it's quiet everywhere today. [/*]

:seeya: Hi Newbiee! Good to see you!

I've been looking for information about Drew every day, but there just hasn't been any new news...

I guess Drew and Brodsky are just being very quiet right now.

newbiee

06-09-2008, 02:31 PM

Hi Anakerie! :seeya:

I google DP every morning hoping for something, and never get anything good.

Jpanda

06-10-2008, 11:23 AM

Originally posted by grammybear
I come here often to see if there is any news about Stacy. It has felt very quiert lately to me. I suspect something is going on. The grand jury has been at it for awhile and I would guess there will be a decision coming soon. I seem to remember in Naomi Arnettes case it was really quiet just before she was found.
I am sure that the da is getting all their ducks in a row.

My hubby asks me about once a week if there is any news. As he said the le would not have named Drew as a suspect unless there was a lot of evidence. I also think the da will bring down an indictment for both Kathleens and Stacys death at once. There may also be other charges too. I am not sure but with him being a le and all the other charges may be involved also.

This has just been going on too long for them to have no evidence.

jmoo [/*]

Hi grammybear, I'm optimistic about it too. I don't think there was any real rush to take him into custody, and so IMO they are taking their time to make sure they have a solid case.

I also think that since they've officially named DP a suspect and and Stacy's disappearance a "potential homicide" that they wouldn't have done so if they didn't have some evidence that lead them to that conclusion.

One other thing I've been thinking about is that interview with Drew's supposed new girlfriend (or ex girlfriend I should say now). She says that LE sat her down and told her that they were 100% sure that DP is guilty and that she could be next, etc. How would they even know about a new girlfriend unless LE has been watching DP's every move? That makes me think that maybe they have him under surveillance and are waiting for him to either lead them to the body or do something else that may incriminate him.

Maybe it's just wishful thinking on my part, but I do believe that is the case.

JMO

Mamie

06-10-2008, 11:15 PM

Originally posted by kimmy56
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/63692

Stacy & Drew: The Irony of Legacies
Rebekah Price

I love this woman. [/*]

What a great article! Thanks for posting it kimmy!

Anakerie

06-11-2008, 12:45 AM

Oh goodie... Drew and Brodsky have given us some news... :rolleyes: And of course, the article is from Drew's "favorite" news writer, Joe Hosey... lol

DREW CAUGHT ON FILM?
DREW PETERSON SAYS STATE POLICE ARE USING CAMERAS ON HIS NEIGHBOR'S HOME TO WATCH HIM.
http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/heraldnews/news/998661,4_1_JO11_PETERSON_S1.article

tallcoolone

06-11-2008, 10:47 AM

Awwww...... poor Drew. Life's rough and about to get a whole lot rougher very soon.

Smile Drew, you're on candid camera!

Tee Hee!!

Nova

06-11-2008, 07:47 PM

Originally posted by Anakerie
Oh goodie... Drew and Brodsky have given us some news... :rolleyes: And of course, the article is from Drew's "favorite" news writer, Joe Hosey... lol

DREW CAUGHT ON FILM?
DREW PETERSON SAYS STATE POLICE ARE USING CAMERAS ON HIS NEIGHBOR'S HOME TO WATCH HIM.
http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/heraldnews/news/998661,4_1_JO11_PETERSON_S1.article [/*]
Gotta LUV Sharon, her response to JB, "bite me", LUV IT!!!!!
Haven't been around in awhile. I thought the GJ was going to decide by end of May about DP's sons testifying. I thought by now, they would have indicted him, this seems to be taking forever :( .
I apologize if this has already been discussed. I truly hope soon he is indicted for Kathleen's murder and that somehow, someway Stacy is found (I don't believe she is alive) ... so I'd like to see him indicted for her murder also.
:rose: For Kathleen, Stacy and the Kids!!!!

concernedmom

06-12-2008, 01:26 AM

yeah Drew. Sharon cant wait to see you naked so she can try out her new barf bag.
I can not see what attracts women to Drew. We have a new guy start at work with the arrogance and cockiness Of DB and after only a week and half I can not stand him. :cuss:

(Maybe Ill use Sharons line on him.):D

Cury-us Coyote

06-12-2008, 10:00 AM

Will County Board GOP members consider replacing the coroner with a medical examiner
Forensic pathologist to testify Thursday before the panel
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-coroner-12-jun12,0,4812862.story

north-eh

06-12-2008, 08:22 PM

check this out!

http://www.nationalenquirer.com/

N

watchu

06-12-2008, 10:45 PM

How hard up those girls must be! Drew is just showing who we all know he is.... A cad!

kimmy56

06-13-2008, 12:30 AM

Originally posted by watchu
How hard up those girls must be! Drew is just showing who we all know he is.... A cad! [/*]

OMG - he is SUCH white trash!

not.another

06-13-2008, 01:16 AM

Originally posted by north-eh
check this out!

http://www.nationalenquirer.com/

N [/*]

From looking at that picture a little closer, it looks like Drew came up behind the girls and then the photo was taken. See how the girls arms are linked together? They might not have even wanted him in the picture - imo. This guy is a sleezebag partying it up while his kids are home with who knows who? Certainly not their mom that's for sure. It's been so long it makes me wonder if Stacy will ever be found. This makes me very very sad. And seeing and hearing about Drew cavorting all over on his numerous nights out makes me want to
barf

Have a good evening everyone. I think our house is going to wash away with all the rain we are getting.

Anakerie

06-13-2008, 02:11 AM

Originally posted by north-eh
check this out!

http://www.nationalenquirer.com/

N [/*]

Oh good grief... From the link:
"Drew was acting like a celebrity - drinking and posing for pictures with the barmaids," bar manager Stephanie Reed told The ENQUIRER.

"He sure didn't seem like a man who missed his wife," said tattooed blonde waitress Corinne Walski.

I'll agree with the waitress.. He sure doesn't look like a man missing his wife. He looks like a dirty old man trying to get his hands on as many young females as he can... Ugh.

watchu

06-13-2008, 11:17 AM

I can see this blown up at his double murder trial.... Keep it up Drew.... and your mother must be so proud of you.... NOT!

Anakerie

06-13-2008, 12:10 PM

Grand Jury news:

Savio's divorce attorney testifies
http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/heraldnews/news/1003461,4_1_JO13_PETERSON_S1.article

The divorce attorney for Drew Peterson's third wife was called before the grand jury Thursday.

Harry Smith, a Wheaton lawyer who represented third wife Kathleen Savio in her divorce from Peterson, did not comment on his way into the closed hearing Thursday afternoon.

north-eh

06-13-2008, 08:32 PM

Originally posted by Anakerie
Grand Jury news:

Savio's divorce attorney testifies
http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/heraldnews/news/1003461,4_1_JO13_PETERSON_S1.article

The divorce attorney for Drew Peterson's third wife was called before the grand jury Thursday.

Harry Smith, a Wheaton lawyer who represented third wife Kathleen Savio in her divorce from Peterson, did not comment on his way into the closed hearing Thursday afternoon. [/*]

It's good to see they are hearing testimony from every single person who has had the slightest contact with DP or anyone associated with him. I still wonder where the boys fit in with all of this....will they testify I mean. I sure hope they are nearing the end tho.

:seeya:
N

spiritwolf46

06-13-2008, 10:41 PM

Originally posted by north-eh

It's good to see they are hearing testimony from every single person who has had the slightest contact with DP or anyone associated with him. I still wonder where the boys fit in with all of this....will they testify I mean. I sure hope they are nearing the end tho.

:seeya:
N [/*]

ITA!!! Just when you think that they are wrapping things up, they aren't.

I think that the fact they are being SO thorough is such a good sign. :)

Just hope that there is SOME kind of news soon!

Has anyone here known of a GJ to take this long (in a good way)?

Personally, I think that if they are taking each and every individual as they come along, sure has to say they have something!

Could be wrong, have been wrong a LOT in my life, but I pray that I am not wrong on this one.

:rose: For Stacy and all of her loved ones.

mdlm

06-14-2008, 01:15 PM

north-eh

06-14-2008, 08:57 PM

Originally posted by mdlm

The end will be near when Tom Morphy takes the stand.
jmo and imo and yada... [/*]

Well my goodness, I plum forgot out star witness imo!
Yes sir, that is a good point, that could be very telling indeed.
N

tallcoolone

06-15-2008, 09:35 PM

Originally posted by north-eh

Well my goodness, I plum forgot out star witness imo!
Yes sir, that is a good point, that could be very telling indeed.
N [/*]But hasn't Tom Morphy already appeared in front of the Grand Jury, or am I just loosing my mind????

~TCO~ knowing patience is a virtue, trying really hard to be virtuous (sp?) but failing miserably............

watchu

06-15-2008, 09:43 PM

Maybe I'm crazy, but I thought Tom was already in front of the GJ

tagalong

06-15-2008, 11:04 PM

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-peterson-stepbrothersapr16,0,1549239.story

John Morphey said his brother told him that he met Drew at a coffee shop near Peterson's home on the night of Oct. 28. They talked awhile, then Peterson drove Tom Morphey to a nearby park and left him with a cell phone and instructions not to answer if it rang, his brother said. Peterson drove off. After awhile, the phone rang, and the name "Stacy" appeared on the caller ID, Morphey said.

"I believe he set my brother up with that phone call," John Morphey said.

When Peterson returned, the two men reportedly went to his house and moved the container from the home to the back of Peterson's 2005 GMC Yukon. John Morphey said his brother told him Peterson seemed very nervous as he drove him back to his home, a few minutes away in Bolingbrook.

The following evening, Tom attempted suicide, John Morphey said.

"I was on the phone that night when my brother swallowed those pills," he said. "He told me, 'That's it, I'm done. I'm taking a bunch of pills. [Peterson] is going to get me anyway.'

"He said that he thought he may have inadvertently helped dispose of Stacy's body," John Morphey said. "I couldn't believe what I was hearing."

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I thought Tom and Drew were in the coffee shop, when Drew left the phone with Tom and told him not to answer it, if it rang.

Surely Tom's brother knows the correct story. I was just surfing looking to see if Tom Morphey had appeared before GJ and I ran across this info. Now, I'm puzzled.

mdlm

06-16-2008, 12:39 AM

********************
As far as I can tell per:
http://www.acandyrose.com/stacy_peterson_grand_jury.htm

Tom Morphy has not been before the GJ, and don't see how they can proceed without him in Stacy's case...Kathleen-???, they have the bathtub!

:read: hammer

I think Tom Morphy would have to be called in Stacy's case and the children too, then an arrest may come about...wish they could do it without the children though! :no:

...but there may be no choice.
...but that's the sign for a GJ decision either way.

imo and jmo and yada...!

mdlm

06-16-2008, 12:44 AM

Originally posted by tagalong
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-peterson-stepbrothersapr16,0,1549239.story

John Morphey said his brother told him that he met Drew at a coffee shop near Peterson's home on the night of Oct. 28. They talked awhile, then Peterson drove Tom Morphey to a nearby park and left him with a cell phone and instructions not to answer if it rang, his brother said. Peterson drove off. After awhile, the phone rang, and the name "Stacy" appeared on the caller ID, Morphey said.

"I believe he set my brother up with that phone call," John Morphey said.

When Peterson returned, the two men reportedly went to his house and moved the container from the home to the back of Peterson's 2005 GMC Yukon. John Morphey said his brother told him Peterson seemed very nervous as he drove him back to his home, a few minutes away in Bolingbrook.

The following evening, Tom attempted suicide, John Morphey said.

"I was on the phone that night when my brother swallowed those pills," he said. "He told me, 'That's it, I'm done. I'm taking a bunch of pills. [Peterson] is going to get me anyway.'

"He said that he thought he may have inadvertently helped dispose of Stacy's body," John Morphey said. "I couldn't believe what I was hearing."

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I thought Tom and Drew were in the coffee shop, when Drew left the phone with Tom and told him not to answer it, if it rang.

Surely Tom's brother knows the correct story. I was just surfing looking to see if Tom Morphey had appeared before GJ and I ran across this info. Now, I'm puzzled. [/*]

************??????????

How did those little hammer head guys get in my post?
OMG...apologies!

:shrug:

tagalong

06-16-2008, 12:55 AM

:lol:
You clicked on one of the Smilies when writing your post.

spiritwolf46

06-16-2008, 08:30 PM

Originally posted by mdlm

************??????????

How did those little hammer head guys get in my post?
OMG...apologies!

:shrug: [/*]

That is so funny! Can't tell you how many times I have done this and had to edit!

Thanks for the laugh, though! :lol:

watchu

06-17-2008, 12:07 PM

Uh... There's only one thing that stinks here and it's Drew...

...emoticons are listed like this. :angry:
if they are entered wrong, sometimes just typing the word 'angry' will make the smiley take the place of the word....

Land Shark®

06-17-2008, 12:11 PM

Originally posted by june1943

snipped

Something about this whole thing stinks.

The stink emanates from Drew Peterson.

north-eh

06-17-2008, 04:52 PM

Good day everyone:seeya:
I have a question, I'm sure someone here can answer this for me, I would appreciate it thanks.
Do trial witnesses have to appear before the GJ prior to giving testimony in a trial? I ask because of Tom Morphey. So, if he hasn't testified yet, perhaps he doesn't have to....he's slated for the trial.
N

north-eh

06-17-2008, 09:31 PM

Originally posted by north-eh
Good day everyone:seeya:
I have a question, I'm sure someone here can answer this for me, I would appreciate it thanks.
Do trial witnesses have to appear before the GJ prior to giving testimony in a trial? I ask because of Tom Morphey. So, if he hasn't testified yet, perhaps he doesn't have to....he's slated for the trial.
N [/*]

Sorry to quote myself, but I just realized the last sentence was supposed to a questionhammer ....... not a statement. gawd!
N

tagalong

06-18-2008, 03:20 AM

Originally posted by june1943

Unclezeek don't know if you are still around but if you are i want to run this past you. You know Stacy, was she capable of trying to set DP up for killing KP? I find it strange that shortly before she disappears she seeks out a clergy and tells him something that she has susposedly known for years. That DP killed KP. Then She goes to the same attorney that KP used ,now remember Stacy was KP's worst enemy but she goes to this attorney seeking a divorce. Then she disappears. Do you think she thought DP would have been arrested for the murder of KP by now and she could come back and have all the family assets. She could always say she was laying low out of fear. Something about this whole thing stinks. [/*]

One question ... why would DP give Stacy an alibi as to why she is missing?? (DP said that Stacy called him to TELL HIM where she was.)

MsTuri

06-18-2008, 08:00 AM

Originally posted by Jpanda

Hi grammybear, I'm optimistic about it too. I don't think there was any real rush to take him into custody, and so IMO they are taking their time to make sure they have a solid case.

I also think that since they've officially named DP a suspect and and Stacy's disappearance a "potential homicide" that they wouldn't have done so if they didn't have some evidence that lead them to that conclusion.

One other thing I've been thinking about is that interview with Drew's supposed new girlfriend (or ex girlfriend I should say now). She says that LE sat her down and told her that they were 100% sure that DP is guilty and that she could be next, etc. How would they even know about a new girlfriend unless LE has been watching DP's every move? That makes me think that maybe they have him under surveillance and are waiting for him to either lead them to the body or do something else that may incriminate him.

Maybe it's just wishful thinking on my part, but I do believe that is the case.

JMO [/*]

If they follow him around long enough, they might be there when he attempts to murder another woman.
Anyone who would date this creep has a screw loose. I can't believe there are people stupid enough to date him- am I missing something? WHAT about him would attract a women in her 20's??
Hes NOT good looking and it cannot be his charming personality.
I think he acts like a horses hind end all of the time, not just when he has cameras pointed at him.

I live live live for the day they finally arrest him and make the bond so high he can't get out. I also live for the day they find Stacy so her family can have some closure.

Mamie

06-18-2008, 10:12 PM

I'm wondering with all the rain and the difficulty that is going on in a few states, Illinois being one of them, is that little town that had to be evacuated close to Bolingbrook, and could SP's poor body surface, and DP be shaking in this boots over this?:shrug: JMO

martha

06-18-2008, 11:36 PM

Maybe the rain is what will bring sp home. I sure hope so but I think dp is so smug because he knows no one will ever find her. I believe he planed this way ahead and tryed to think of everything. I keep praying he will let something slip. I know in my heart a mother would not go away and not get in touch with her babys. I think if she did leave she would have taken her babys. jmho:rose:

Anakerie

06-19-2008, 01:04 AM

Drew and Brodsky seem to be slipping. It seems like most weeks we get some little "tidbit" from them on Tuesdays. Here it is Wednesday and all I can find is an article about the Savio estate case.

Savio estate: 'They just don’t want us pawing around'
http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/napervillesun/news/1012334,jo18_savio_web.article

And what do you know... The article isn't by Joe Hosey or whatever his name is that usually writes up the Drew and Brodsky show.

martha

06-19-2008, 08:31 AM

I don't think drew is worried about any of this. on sp he has made darn sure no one finds her. He has prob spent the money he got from ks estate. I don;t know why any girl would want to date him looks like they would be scared to death of him. he may not pay here on earth but he will pay one of these days. God does not let people do what ever they want to do and not suffer some time or another.jmho:rose:

kizzzy

06-21-2008, 01:33 AM

Anyone wondering if all the flooding in that part of the country may unearth something unexpected? Sometimes from bad comes a little good! :)

Mamie

06-21-2008, 05:05 AM

Originally posted by kizzzy
Anyone wondering if all the flooding in that part of the country may unearth something unexpected? Sometimes from bad comes a little good! :) [/*]

A little "Devine Intervention" would be nice, wouldn't it? Atleast that's what I called it when Laci and her son showed up.

MystryPhobia

06-21-2008, 06:47 PM

Originally posted by kizzzy
Anyone wondering if all the flooding in that part of the country may unearth something unexpected? Sometimes from bad comes a little good! :) [/*]

I have wondered this too kizzzy.

Hopefully Drew Peterson has lost some sleep thinking about the possiblity too. Seems like he isn't losing much else anymore.

tagalong

06-23-2008, 03:36 AM

Please help...I cannot remember where DP said he was when Stacy called him to say she had "run off" with another man and told him where to find her car. Anyone know?

browser

06-23-2008, 03:40 PM

Originally posted by tagalong
Please help...I cannot remember where DP said he was when Stacy called him to say she had "run off" with another man and told him where to find her car. Anyone know? [/*]

I don't believe he has made that statement public. I'm assuming from what he told Cass that he was driving around BB looking for Stacy or at home. According to Morphey, he had Drews phone at Crisy Creme Donuts near Drews house when she called.

not.another

06-23-2008, 06:47 PM

Originally posted by tagalong
Please help...I cannot remember where DP said he was when Stacy called him to say she had "run off" with another man and told him where to find her car. Anyone know? [/*]

IIRC Drew was at home when Stacy called him to tell him she was running off with another man. This I remember from one of his interviews (possibly Greta).

Morphey and DP were at a coffee/donut shop and then went to a park where DP left him his phone and told Morphey not to answer it. It did in fact ring and it came up as "Stacy".

tagalong

06-23-2008, 06:52 PM

You know what doesn't make sense to me is, why would DP go with Morphey to a coffee house (out in a public place where I would think most people would recognize DP) and then say Morphey made the whole thing up, that he's a drunk and mentally ill. Am I wrong or is DP just denying that he didn't know anything about a blue barrel being moved from his house?

Anakerie

06-24-2008, 04:22 PM

State wants Drew's subpoena quashed
http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/napervillesun/news/1020712,4_1_JO24_PETERSON_S1.article

But the subpoena is "overly broad" and doesn't seek information related to the felony gun charge, Osterberger argued in the motion to quash.
Peterson will return to Will County Judge Richard Schoenstedt's courtroom at 9:30 a.m. June 30.

Peterson Subpoena Of Police Records Fought
http://www.postchronicle.com/news/breakingnews/article_212154326.shtml
Illinois prosecutors asked a judge to quash a subpoena filed by former police officer Drew Pearson, who is seeking evidence in a gun case against him.
The Will County State's Attorney's office contended the subpoena is overly broad and seeks evidence not strictly relevant to the firearms case against Pearson, who is also under scrutiny in the disappearance of his fourth wife last fall.

north-eh

06-25-2008, 10:29 PM

Hi Anakerie:seeya:
Sounds to me like Brodsky and Co. are fishing for any information they can get in MO....whatever works.
N

Mamie

06-26-2008, 01:24 AM

I'm fishing too!! Where in the heck is any new NEWS in this case??? (Okay, I feel better now that I've vented):seeya:

Anakerie

06-26-2008, 12:34 PM

It seems as though Drew and Brodsky have been unusually quiet the last couple of weeks. I google the news almost every day and rarely now does anything come up that has to do with the Bolingbrook Drew. I have been surprised at how many other Drew Peterson's there are. And I feel very sorry for all those other guys who happen to share the name.

spiritwolf46

06-26-2008, 07:49 PM

Originally posted by Anakerie
It seems as though Drew and Brodsky have been unusually quiet the last couple of weeks. I google the news almost every day and rarely now does anything come up that has to do with the Bolingbrook Drew. I have been surprised at how many other Drew Peterson's there are. And I feel very sorry for all those other guys who happen to share the name. [/*]

:seeya: God luv ya, Anakerie!!! Thanks for searching the web for some news for all of us and keeping us up to date on what you get.

Have a GREAT eve!!!!!

Mamie

06-26-2008, 10:06 PM

Originally posted by spiritwolf46

:seeya: God luv ya, Anakerie!!! Thanks for searching the web for some news for all of us and keeping us up to date on what you get.

Have a GREAT eve!!!!! [/*]

I second that, Anakerie!! I just don't want this case to go away like the Young case and the other poor woman in IL who has been missing so long. And I realize the other two haven't gone away but you sure don't hear anything at all about them or atleast I don't. JMO

not.another

06-26-2008, 11:16 PM

Originally posted by Mamie

I second that, Anakerie!! I just don't want this case to go away like the Young case and the other poor woman in IL who has been missing so long. And I realize the other two haven't gone away but you sure don't hear anything at all about them or atleast I don't. JMO [/*]

======================
The other missing in Illinois is Lisa Stebic. Missing longer than Stacy and her husband was a cop also (must be something in the water). Is there even a Lisa Stebic thread on here somewhere?

We haven't even heard any GJ news since May right? This is just going way too slow for me. IMO

:shrug:

Snicker

06-27-2008, 01:36 AM

Drew Peterson's 15-year-old son talks to grand jury
Will County panel investigates death of his mother, disappearance of stepmother

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-drew-peterson_27jun27,0,1841014.story

By Erika Slife | Chicago Tribune reporter
8:28 PM CDT, June 26, 2008

Drew Peterson's teenage son testified Thursday before a Will County grand jury investigating the 2004 death of his mother and the Oct. 28 disappearance of his stepmother.

Wearing a suit and tie and appearing composed, Thomas Peterson, 15, left the courthouse garage at about 4:15 p.m. in the passenger seat of his attorney's car.

For months, the grand jury has been looking into the death of his mother, Kathleen Savio, who was found dead in an empty bathtub in her Bolingbrook home. She was only weeks away from a divorce settlement with Drew Peterson when she died.

Authorities decided to take another look at her death—which had been initially ruled an accident—after Peterson's current wife, Stacy, disappeared. Police named Drew Peterson, 54, as a suspect in Stacy's disappearance. In February, Will County State's Atty. James Glasgow said Savio had been murdered.

Peterson has denied any wrongdoing in either case. Reached by phone Thursday, he said he was concerned about the welfare of his son.

"He's been at the grand jury for what? Four hours?" Peterson said. "That's concerning [to me that] they'd put any 15-year-old kid through all that grilling."

A spokesman for Glasgow's office, Charles Pelkie, said he could not comment on grand jury proceedings. However, he said that in all investigations, young witnesses are always treated with care.

"What I can say is that any time young people are questioned with regard to any investigation, I'm speaking broadly here, we take every extra step to make sure they're treated properly and respectfully," he said. "We do everything that we can to limit the stress and the anxiety that may be caused in any interview."

Thomas, and his younger brother, Kristopher, 13, were interviewed in the Will County Children's Advocacy Center in November.

eslife@tribune.com

Jpanda

06-27-2008, 11:07 AM

Another one:

"Drew Peterson criticized authorities for calling his 15-year-old son before the grand jury investigating the October disappearance of Peterson's fourth wife and the 2004 death of his third wife."

http://www.nbc5.com/news/16725185/detail.html?rss=chi&psp=news

Jpanda

06-27-2008, 11:10 AM

I'd like to add that anything that ticks Drew Peterson off makes me happy. :D

I'm sure LE knows what they're doing, as far as interviewing a 15-year-old is concerned. If his father is guilty, he deserves to know the truth. Hopefully that will all come out soon.

jmo

mdlm

06-27-2008, 11:46 AM

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Snicker
Drew Peterson's 15-year-old son talks to grand jury
Will County panel investigates death of his mother, disappearance of stepmother

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-drew-peterson_27jun27,0,1841014.story

By Erika Slife | Chicago Tribune reporter
8:28 PM CDT, June 26, 2008

Drew Peterson's teenage son testified Thursday before a Will County grand jury investigating the 2004 death of his mother and the Oct. 28 disappearance of his stepmother.

Wearing a suit and tie and appearing composed, Thomas Peterson, 15, left the courthouse garage at about 4:15 p.m. in the passenger seat of his attorney's car.

For months, the grand jury has been looking into the death of his mother, Kathleen Savio, who was found dead in an empty bathtub in her Bolingbrook home. She was only weeks away from a divorce settlement with Drew Peterson when she died.

Authorities decided to take another look at her death—which had been initially ruled an accident—after Peterson's current wife, Stacy, disappeared. Police named Drew Peterson, 54, as a suspect in Stacy's disappearance. In February, Will County State's Atty. James Glasgow said Savio had been murdered.

Peterson has denied any wrongdoing in either case. Reached by phone Thursday, he said he was concerned about the welfare of his son.

"He's been at the grand jury for what? Four hours?" Peterson said. "That's concerning [to me that] they'd put any 15-year-old kid through all that grilling."
*snip

One may also question who put this child in this position in the first place.

:flamemad: jmo and imo and yada...

mdlm

06-27-2008, 12:08 PM

http://www.drewpeterson1.blogspot.com/

This is bizzare, I just ran across it.
Is this THE Ashley Drew was involved with? Well, just thought I'd share and have not made or formed an opinion of my own.
jmo and imo and yada...

not.another

06-27-2008, 12:21 PM

Thank you Cury for the updates on the links only thread. The fact
that his son stood before the GJ for over 4 hours is very telling. Sounds like they might be getting close to wrapping up! Thank
you for keeping us all in the loop and informed. I was just saying upthread that we hadn't heard from the GJ in awhile. They must have heard my prayers!

:beer:

Three cheers from me for sure!
IMO

Anakerie

06-27-2008, 12:25 PM

Thank you for the links Snicker and Jpanda... It's good to know that the GJ is still looking into the case. I was beginning to wonder. I also am wondering if the GJ is also still calling witnesses about the Stebic case. We hardly hear of anything about it anymore.

In the link Jpanda put up, Drew talks says that the appearance before the GJ didn't "traumatize" his son much... Uhm.. Wouldn't the poor kid be more traumatized by the fact that his mother is dead and his stepmother is missing?

Anakerie

06-27-2008, 12:31 PM

Originally posted by mdlm
http://www.drewpeterson1.blogspot.com/

This is bizzare, I just ran across it.
Is this THE Ashley Drew was involved with? Well, just thought I'd share and have not made or formed an opinion of my own.
jmo and imo and yada... [/*]

Wow.. That is bizarre! I wonder how many more posts this Ashley will be putting up for the world to see.... lol

Nova

06-27-2008, 01:05 PM

THANKS Snicker, Cury-us, mdlm and anyone else for posting updates and links ... very much appreciated.
I was just thinking the other day about the GJ ... I thought things were supposed to wrap up towards end of May, obviously I was wrong, here it is the end of June!!!!
I truly thought by now the GJ would have indicted DP for the murders of Kathleen and Stacy, but alas NADA. I just checked out the DPblogspot link ... and although rather interesting, I could not stomach seeing DP's "Smug Mug".
Again thanks to all for constantly updating ... just waiting and hoping like the rest of us for this case to break wide open.
:rose: As always for Kathleen, Stacy and the children

Jpanda

06-27-2008, 01:54 PM

Originally posted by Anakerie

Wow.. That is bizarre! I wonder how many more posts this Ashley will be putting up for the world to see.... lol [/*]

OH MY GOD - I just went to that site....If you read in the comments, it doesn't sound like the girl he was actually dating (the one that slept over - ew) but she says they "chatted online."

Sounds like this chick was just using him for 15 seconds of fame, hence the blog.

Wow.

tallcoolone

06-27-2008, 07:56 PM

Originally posted by Jpanda

OH MY GOD - I just went to that site....If you read in the comments, it doesn't sound like the girl he was actually dating (the one that slept over - ew) but she says they "chatted online."

Sounds like this chick was just using him for 15 seconds of fame, hence the blog.

Wow. [/*]Hmmmm....... from my perspective, if it were I that had made contact with him over the net, I would likely have done something along the same line and expose him for the disgusting pig he is. But it wouldn't be for the fame. It would be to expose him for the disgusting pig that he is............:shrug:

north-eh

06-27-2008, 09:08 PM

:seeya:
FYI Nancy Grace will be doing a segment on DP, regarding his frolicing with young women in local bars, blah blah
N

north-eh

06-27-2008, 09:25 PM

Originally posted by mdlm
http://www.drewpeterson1.blogspot.com/

This is bizzare, I just ran across it.
Is this THE Ashley Drew was involved with? Well, just thought I'd share and have not made or formed an opinion of my own.
jmo and imo and yada... [/*]

Well thank you mdlm!
I have my opinion formed already, and now I KNOW he's one sick SOB! I just had to say it, this truly capped his mental capacity for me.....whewww there.barf

Mamie

06-27-2008, 11:23 PM

Originally posted by north-eh

Well thank you mdlm!
I have my opinion formed already, and now I KNOW he's one sick SOB! I just had to say it, this truly capped his mental capacity for me.....whewww there.barf [/*]

You got my attention with your comment----lol----and I agree!

I also can hardly wait to read ALL of her posts and the emails from him. (It's entertainment-----truly, entertainment):seeya:

north-eh

06-28-2008, 08:31 PM

Originally posted by Mamie

You got my attention with your comment----lol----and I agree!

I also can hardly wait to read ALL of her posts and the emails from him. (It's entertainment-----truly, entertainment):seeya: [/*]

Hi Mamie, yes I have even bookmarked her site, don't want to miss anything she posts.....why, as you say, it's entertainment. But somewhere in all of this madness..... it's sounds just like him.
jmo of course
N

Adalena935

06-29-2008, 12:50 AM

I pray they find Stacy. Her poor family and loved ones especially her children.

aubrey04

06-29-2008, 01:01 AM

Originally posted by mdlm
http://www.drewpeterson1.blogspot.com/

This is bizzare, I just ran across it.
Is this THE Ashley Drew was involved with? Well, just thought I'd share and have not made or formed an opinion of my own.
jmo and imo and yada... [/*]

:eek: wow :eek:

I don't know if that's for real or not. I can't tell?!? If it is, she's bold... and if it's not, s/he's still bold. LOL.

:chicken:

aubrey04

06-29-2008, 01:04 AM

I feel sorry for his 15 year old kid who had to testify at the grand jury hearing. How awful for him. This is going to haunt him for a long time to come. VERY sad. :(

watchu

06-29-2008, 11:52 AM

The poor kid has lost a mother and a step mother at the hands of his father.... Way more troubling than testifying....

not.another

06-29-2008, 12:47 PM

Originally posted by aubrey04
I feel sorry for his 15 year old kid who had to testify at the grand jury hearing. How awful for him. This is going to haunt him for a long time to come. VERY sad. :( [/*]

==============

Drew had to have known ahead of time that his older sons would be testifying. So, I'm sure that he was told what to say. Four hours is a long time and I'm hoping that his son broke down and finally told what he knew about what went on with both his mothers. And he probably was grilled afterwards by his dad about the things he said and what was asked of him. That alone had to be sad for his son! Anyway, it's nice to see that progress is being made with the GJ.
IMO

Mamie

06-29-2008, 05:45 PM

Originally posted by not.another

==============

Drew had to have known ahead of time that his older sons would be testifying. So, I'm sure that he was told what to say. Four hours is a long time and I'm hoping that his son broke down and finally told what he knew about what went on with both his mothers. And he probably was grilled afterwards by his dad about the things he said and what was asked of him. That alone had to be sad for his son! Anyway, it's nice to see that progress is being made with the GJ.
IMO [/*]

And hopefully the GJ saw through that and let him know they saw through it I agree, most tragic that the older ones have to go through this. Maybe their experience will help to make them better adults and not put themselves in a position to become like their father. JMO

Justice_Dawg

06-29-2008, 05:47 PM

Originally posted by aubrey04

:eek: wow :eek:

I don't know if that's for real or not. I can't tell?!? If it is, she's bold... and if it's not, s/he's still bold. LOL.

:chicken: [/*]ITA!

aubrey04

06-29-2008, 10:08 PM

Originally posted by not.another

==============

Drew had to have known ahead of time that his older sons would be testifying. So, I'm sure that he was told what to say. Four hours is a long time and I'm hoping that his son broke down and finally told what he knew about what went on with both his mothers. And he probably was grilled afterwards by his dad about the things he said and what was asked of him. That alone had to be sad for his son! Anyway, it's nice to see that progress is being made with the GJ.
IMO [/*]

Yes, I agree. I just feel sorry for all the kids involved in this mess. They didn't ask to be born into all of it and it's very troubling. I don't know how Drew can live with himself after all the damage he has done and continues to do. If he had any bit of compassion in his heart, he'd come clean and stop all his three-ring circus act.

aubrey04

06-29-2008, 10:37 PM

Uhm, well I came across this youtube video via that Ashley girl's website and there is a journalist named Matthew Phelps, who was on a radio show hosted by a guy named Denny Griffin. Phelps claims that Drew Peterson and Brodsky approached him about writing a book which would try to place the blame of Kathleen Savio's death onto Stacy Peterson. He says that Peterson wanted the journalist to trash Stacy and Savio.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WRWtTyuILfs

north-eh

06-30-2008, 03:10 PM

Originally posted by aubrey04
Uhm, well I came across this youtube video via that Ashley girl's website and there is a journalist named Matthew Phelps, who was on a radio show hosted by a guy named Denny Griffin. Phelps claims that Drew Peterson and Brodsky approached him about writing a book which would try to place the blame of Kathleen Savio's death onto Stacy Peterson. He says that Peterson wanted the journalist to trash Stacy and Savio.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WRWtTyuILfs [/*]

Quite frankly, it's disgusting isn't it. There is no doubt in my mind that DP will go to any lengths, oh and don't forget Brodsky, to make whatever they can off of these two cases. It still surprises me but doesn't shock me anymore..... to hear whatever these two scheme up in their warped minds. jmo.
N

aubrey04

07-01-2008, 04:48 AM

Originally posted by Justamama
Ok, so this is my first post on this thread but I want to go down in history as putting it in print somewhere, (and I'm not even going to preface it by saying "I think")...

But...Dru Peterson's SON commited this crime, he's completely mentally ill. Dru Peterson is also mentally ill but the son has been committing these murders all along to "protect" daddy.

I'll be back later to post all the research I've been doing.

I know this sounds like a completely crazy rant but have you ever found out the truth about something and you announce to friends and family "SEE! I told you so!!!" and they look at you like they have never even heard you mention it before?

Well, heh, heh now I have it in print. [/*]

His name is -- DREW peterson, not DRU.

Please come back when you have information to back up your statements. I am sure we will all be waiting for it.. Just what motive would one of his son's have to kill Stacy (Or Kathleen)?

martha

07-01-2008, 07:53 AM

Originally posted by Justamama
Ok, so this is my first post on this thread but I want to go down in history as putting it in print somewhere, (and I'm not even going to preface it by saying "I think")...

But...Dru Peterson's SON commited this crime, he's completely mentally ill. Dru Peterson is also mentally ill but the son has been committing these murders all along to "protect" daddy.

I'll be back later to post all the research I've been doing.

I know this sounds like a completely crazy rant but have you ever found out the truth about something and you announce to friends and family "SEE! I told you so!!!" and they look at you like they have never even heard you mention it before?

Well, heh, heh now I have it in print. [/*] I would love to know what son you or talking about. Does one of his sons love him enought to kill for him. Has a doc said one of his sons is mental ill? please give us the inf on the son you or talking about.:rose:

Anakerie

07-01-2008, 11:42 AM

Originally posted by grammybear

I am curious justmama, how did you come to this conclusion. I have been following this case very closely, and I agree about Drew having mental conditions but the other part has thrown me completely.
Which son are you talking about? Drew has four sons two minors and two adults. His one sone I believe his name is Eric from what I understand he has mothing to do with Drew. His other son is Steven. He is also a police officer and his other two sons are minors. So lets start with which son and then we can go fron there. Ir is an interesting theory and lets see if we can talk it through. [/*]

Just a minor correction. Drew has 5 sons and 1 daughter (That we know of.). 2 adult sons (1st wife), 2 teenage sons (3rd wife, Kathleen) and the youngest son and daughter (4th wife, Stacy).

Anakerie

07-01-2008, 02:29 PM

I found an interesting "boo hoo" from Mr. Brodsky over on the SYM boards.. He wrote that he had been "blacklisted" from "crimrant"... So.. Off to google I go and I corrected Mr. Brodsky's spelling and searched for Crime Rant...

Here it is.. A lovely entry about the interview with M. William Phelps about that book that Drew and Brodsky allegedly wanted him to write to slam Kathleen and Stacy. (Someone posted a Youtube link to the recording above.)

Drew Peterson: Liar, Liar Pants on Fire (http://www.crimerant.com/?p=1711)

north-eh

07-01-2008, 03:27 PM

north-eh

07-01-2008, 03:38 PM

Originally posted by Anakerie
I found an interesting "boo hoo" from Mr. Brodsky over on the SYM boards.. He wrote that he had been "blacklisted" from "crimrant"... So.. Off to google I go and I corrected Mr. Brodsky's spelling and searched for Crime Rant...

Here it is.. A lovely entry about the interview with M. William Phelps about that book that Drew and Brodsky allegedly wanted him to write to slam Kathleen and Stacy. (Someone posted a Youtube link to the recording above.)

Drew Peterson: Liar, Liar Pants on Fire (http://www.crimerant.com/?p=1711) [/*]

Sickening, just sickening!
One poster at Crime Rant( thank you BTW, for spelling it correctly)was right......it is a good thing they have each other, they are both disgusting. I really have no more to say.
Just my opinion, of course
N

north-eh

07-01-2008, 03:53 PM

Oh I also meant to add that Brodsky's spelling and grammer are pathetic.
N

aubrey04

07-01-2008, 04:32 PM

Originally posted by Anakerie
I found an interesting "boo hoo" from Mr. Brodsky over on the SYM boards.. He wrote that he had been "blacklisted" from "crimrant"... So.. Off to google I go and I corrected Mr. Brodsky's spelling and searched for Crime Rant...

Here it is.. A lovely entry about the interview with M. William Phelps about that book that Drew and Brodsky allegedly wanted him to write to slam Kathleen and Stacy. (Someone posted a Youtube link to the recording above.)

Drew Peterson: Liar, Liar Pants on Fire (http://www.crimerant.com/?p=1711) [/*]

Thanks for the link. I hope that Matt Phelps will release some of the conversation -- like he said he might. If Brodsky keeps egging him on, I bet he will. A lot of things are making sense to me right now. I think Phelps is credible because Joe Hosey IS writing a book about Drew Peterson and he does continue to write articles which seem to be biased in favor of Peterson.

It's all starting to click together in my mind.. Why would anyone be in cahoots with Drew Peterson and make money off the deaths of two people?

:confused: :confused:

aubrey04

07-01-2008, 04:35 PM

Originally posted by north-eh

Quite frankly, it's disgusting isn't it. There is no doubt in my mind that DP will go to any lengths, oh and don't forget Brodsky, to make whatever they can off of these two cases. It still surprises me but doesn't shock me anymore..... to hear whatever these two scheme up in their warped minds. jmo.
N [/*]

It is sickening. I really hope that Stacy's body is found soon. Her body is out there somewhere. Where is she? I wish her family/searchers would somehow get a sign to where she's at.. and could lead them to her.

There has to be closure for Stacy's family... this can't continue on.

Anakerie

07-01-2008, 05:03 PM

Originally posted by Justamama

Martha;

Your post is so inviting and curious. Thank you for that.

If I thought I could post my stuff on this thread without getting ATTACKED I would do so.

I'll be back tonight. [/*]

:rolleyes: I'm sure we'll all be here waiting for your breathtaking revelations about your theory of Drew's son being a murderer... Oh yeah.. And WHICH son is it? He has 5 of them.

BTW, there is nothing in my post that is confrontational or aggressive. We are merely curious as to how you found this theory in your "research".

aubrey04

07-01-2008, 05:12 PM

Originally posted by Justamama

:no: Fighting, name calling and rude behavior is against the rules on this forum. I refuse to get into it with you as I can see from your post that you are monitoring this thread.

A small mis-spell on my behalf, I was also thinking of ANOTHER Dru that I have known.

Everything about your post is confrontational and aggressive.

I can see now why so many people just "lurk" and read here and don't dare post.

barf [/*]

Nothing in my post was rude, confrontational or aggressive.. nor did I call you names. I corrected your misspelling of Drew's name.

I was curious if you had some basis to have that theory/opinion -- that is why I responded. Hopefully you will come back and explain what you meant.

Anakerie

07-01-2008, 05:14 PM

Originally posted by north-eh
Oh I also meant to add that Brodsky's spelling and grammer are pathetic.
N [/*]

I completely agree. I've read a lot of his posts on various sites and have trouble believing the man made it through college and got a degree without learning how to type. Maybe he should think about what he posts before he puts his fingers on the keyboard? And then perhaps do a bit of a spell check? lol

Anakerie

07-01-2008, 05:20 PM

Originally posted by aubrey04

Nothing in my post was rude, confrontational or aggressive.. nor did I call you names. I corrected your misspelling of Drew's name.

I was curious if you had some basis to have that theory/opinion -- that is why I responded. Hopefully you will come back and explain what you meant. [/*]

:shrug: I saw nothing confrontational or aggressive in your post either. I am admitting I'm curious about her theory and what kind of research she's done to back it up.

aubrey04

07-01-2008, 05:55 PM

Originally posted by Anakerie

:shrug: I saw nothing confrontational or aggressive in your post either. I am admitting I'm curious about her theory and what kind of research she's done to back it up. [/*]

Thank you.

Yes, I will be checking back to see what info s/he has to support that theory. It should be interesting.

:patriot:

Nova

07-01-2008, 06:14 PM

Originally posted by Justamama

Martha;

Your post is so inviting and curious. Thank you for that.

If I thought I could post my stuff on this thread without getting ATTACKED I would do so.

I'll be back tonight. [/*]
Your entire post is like a "teaser" for an up and coming TV show or movie :shrug:
Why would you assume if you posted your so-called "stuff" you would be attacked on this thread??? Any news, whether it be about DPeterson himself or even any or all of his sons that would HELP in finding out the truth concerning Kathleen's death and Stacy's disappearance would not warrant any attacks.
The only way I see you getting attacked ... would be if you posted something ridiculous such as "Kathleen killed herself" or "Stacy tossed herself into a blue container, and disappeared".
I too, look forward to what you have to say!!!!!

mdlm

07-01-2008, 09:15 PM

Originally posted by aubrey04

Thanks for the link. I hope that Matt Phelps will release some of the conversation -- like he said he might. If Brodsky keeps egging him on, I bet he will. A lot of things are making sense to me right now. I think Phelps is credible because Joe Hosey IS writing a book about Drew Peterson and he does continue to write articles which seem to be biased in favor of Peterson.

It's all starting to click together in my mind.. Why would anyone be in cahoots with Drew Peterson and make money off the deaths of two people?

:confused: :confused: [/*]

http://drewpeterson1.blogspot.com/

"If She Didn't Want Me She Could Have Just Left"

But, I thought she did according to DP! Am I confused or didn't DP say Stacy left him for another man??? Isn't this a non-hearsay public back peddle? It's his words from his IP, isn't it? OK, if you are telling Ashley she could of just left what exactly did happen if she didn't?

north-eh

07-01-2008, 10:11 PM

Originally posted by mdlm

http://drewpeterson1.blogspot.com/

"If She Didn't Want Me She Could Have Just Left"

But, I thought she did according to DP! Am I confused or didn't DP say Stacy left him for another man??? Isn't this a non-hearsay public back peddle? It's his words from his IP, isn't it? OK, if you are telling Ashley she could of just left what exactly did happen if she didn't? [/*]

I've been thinking about this statement, and I think this is one that could very well come back to haunt DP, I really do IMO. I find her website troubleing, but still I read it, and am waiting for some sort of reply from Brodsky regarding these IM's. I guess we shall see.
N

mdlm

07-01-2008, 11:46 PM

North-eh-
I don't know what to make of it all. JB seems to be focusing attention on the book deal flap...maybe to distract from the fact his client has publicly given two very contradictory statements...1. His wife is not missing, she ran off with another man and called him and told him so, OR, 2. "She Could Have Just Left If She Wanted..."
as told to Ashely.

This speaks volumes IMO and JMO of course.

spiritwolf46

07-02-2008, 08:05 AM

Originally posted by mdlm
North-eh-
I don't know what to make of it all. JB seems to be focusing attention on the book deal flap...maybe to distract from the fact his client has publicly given two very contradictory statements...1. His wife is not missing, she ran off with another man and called him and told him so, OR, 2. "She Could Have Just Left If She Wanted..."
as told to Ashely.

This speaks volumes IMO and JMO of course. [/*]

This IS all so confusing, isn't it? Sheeeesh! BUT, if this
Ashley's website is right, then I sure hope, as you all have stated, that these statements come back and bite both DB and JB right in the arse! Here is hoping that the investigators have seen this and have questioned this Ashley in great length!

:beer:

spiritwolf46

07-02-2008, 08:37 AM

blog site and saw where he tugged his ear, it meant that he loved Ashley. :eek: Man! If this thing is true, he is bigger scum than I could have EVER thought. I mean, I did not think that he could get any worse, but if true, he is worse than the worse.

Good thing that I cannot phathom such eveilness. If I could, I would be worried about myself! ;)

He makes me barf

Anakerie

07-02-2008, 10:47 AM

Originally posted by spiritwolf46
blog site and saw where he tugged his ear, it meant that he loved Ashley. :eek: Man! If this thing is true, he is bigger scum than I could have EVER thought. I mean, I did not think that he could get any worse, but if true, he is worse than the worse.

Good thing that I cannot phathom such eveilness. If I could, I would be worried about myself! ;)

He makes me barf [/*]

The ear tugging thing makes me wonder... How many other women has Drew been talking to on the internet and how many of those other women thought those ear tugs were for them?

tallcoolone

07-02-2008, 10:55 AM

Originally posted by Anakerie

The ear tugging thing makes me wonder... How many other women has Drew been talking to on the internet and how many other women thought those ear tugs were for them? [/*]Hmmm...... now that you mention it, I would venture a guess that there most likely were others who thought those ear tugs were 'just for them'.

He's about as smooth as Ex-lax isn't he? What a charmer..... GACK!

From reading his messages to Ashley, it appears that he considers himself the silver tongued devil......... but in reality, thats what puts the ewwwww in Drew, huh?

north-eh

07-02-2008, 11:14 AM

Originally posted by Anakerie

The ear tugging thing makes me wonder... How many other women has Drew been talking to on the internet and how many of those other women thought those ear tugs were for them? [/*]

You have a very good point there....and I thought they were just for me! j/k of course, but yes it's quite possible those "tugs of love"were meant for more than just Ashley......of all the gaul! This is becoming too much even for me!
N

north-eh

07-02-2008, 11:18 AM

Originally posted by mdlm
North-eh-
I don't know what to make of it all. JB seems to be focusing attention on the book deal flap...maybe to distract from the fact his client has publicly given two very contradictory statements...1. His wife is not missing, she ran off with another man and called him and told him so, OR, 2. "She Could Have Just Left If She Wanted..."
as told to Ashely.

This speaks volumes IMO and JMO of course. [/*]

Oh yes, as I have said, something is so wrong with this IMO.
I'm still waiting for that reply from Brodsky about it, but I agree it does look like a distraction because usually Brodsky is all over anything regarding his lame client.
N

Lyndawitha"Y

07-02-2008, 12:21 PM

Originally posted by north-eh

Oh yes, as I have said, something is so wrong with this IMO.
I'm still waiting for that reply from Brodsky about it, but I agree it does look like a distraction because usually Brodsky is all over anything regarding his lame client.
N [/*]

Oh Man..Ive been searching all morning looking for the satus of any searches going on...nadda but did come across a site called "Bad Cop News"..It seems 90% of articles are about Drew..Kinda gives a blow by blow accounting for his stupid behavior..Its also a refresher to get the timeline of events since Stacy went missing..Good read:

http://www.badcopnews.com/index.php?s=%22Drew+Peterson%22&x=0&y=0

LMS:eek:

aubrey04

07-02-2008, 06:02 PM

I didn't realize that Joe Hosey's book is already out. I just found it on Amazon.com --- it is going for $113.02 -- hardcover... Who would buy a true crime book for $113??? There are no reviews on it.. I wonder if Drew Peterson is profiting off of this book?

http://www.amazon.com/Fatal-Vows-Tragic-Sergeant-Peterson/dp/0451226224/ref=pd_bbs_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1215032204&sr=8-1

aubrey04

07-02-2008, 06:10 PM

Originally posted by mdlm
North-eh-
I don't know what to make of it all. JB seems to be focusing attention on the book deal flap...maybe to distract from the fact his client has publicly given two very contradictory statements...1. His wife is not missing, she ran off with another man and called him and told him so, OR, 2. "She Could Have Just Left If She Wanted..."
as told to Ashely.

This speaks volumes IMO and JMO of course. [/*]

Keen observation.. those statements do not mesh. They contradict each other. I really think this man is 100% guilty of the murder of both women.... He's so arrogant and smug, too. barf

I am not sure if that site is for real or not.. Honestly, I am more inclined to believe that it is a real site. I don't know it's a strange site...

I am like north-eh ~ I am troubled by it but I keep going back to read it.

aubrey04

07-02-2008, 06:12 PM

Originally posted by Lyndawitha"Y

Oh Man..Ive been searching all morning looking for the satus of any searches going on...nadda but did come across a site called "Bad Cop News"..It seems 90% of articles are about Drew..Kinda gives a blow by blow accounting for his stupid behavior..Its also a refresher to get the timeline of events since Stacy went missing..Good read:

http://www.badcopnews.com/index.php?s=%22Drew+Peterson%22&x=0&y=0

LMS:eek: [/*]

Interesting site. He has a real strong fan base, eh? He might just become one of the most despised people in America - next to OJ. (if he's not already).

north-eh

07-02-2008, 07:15 PM

Originally posted by Lyndawitha"Y

Oh Man..Ive been searching all morning looking for the satus of any searches going on...nadda but did come across a site called "Bad Cop News"..It seems 90% of articles are about Drew..Kinda gives a blow by blow accounting for his stupid behavior..Its also a refresher to get the timeline of events since Stacy went missing..Good read:

http://www.badcopnews.com/index.php?s=%22Drew+Peterson%22&x=0&y=0

LMS:eek: [/*]

Thanks for the link, it was mindblowing to be able to go back and reread some of the idiotic things DP and Brodsky have done over time.....will this ever end. *sigh*
N

north-eh

07-02-2008, 08:06 PM

FYI on searches, they appear to be ongoing.

Volunteer Land Search-Sat. July 5 & Sun. July 6, 2008
Volunteer land searches will continue, please meet at the Aquatic Centre at 8:30a.m.
Please remember to wear footwear for muddy or rocky terrain. Tennis shoes NOT recommended. Boots or hiking footwear for your own safety.
Please meet at Bolingbrook Aquatic Centre-click here for map
200 Lindsey Lane
Bolingbrook, IL 60440
Time 8:30 a.m.

N

Anakerie

07-02-2008, 10:30 PM

Originally posted by north-eh
FYI on searches, they appear to be ongoing.

Volunteer Land Search-Sat. July 5 & Sun. July 6, 2008
Volunteer land searches will continue, please meet at the Aquatic Centre at 8:30a.m.
Please remember to wear footwear for muddy or rocky terrain. Tennis shoes NOT recommended. Boots or hiking footwear for your own safety.
Please meet at Bolingbrook Aquatic Centre-click here for map
200 Lindsey Lane
Bolingbrook, IL 60440
Time 8:30 a.m.

N [/*]

Thank you, North-eh. I'm glad they are still searching. I keep hoping that the searchers will find something. Anything. Stacy's family need to have her back.
:rose:

north-eh

07-02-2008, 10:42 PM

Originally posted by Anakerie

Thank you, North-eh. I'm glad they are still searching. I keep hoping that the searchers will find something. Anything. Stacy's family need to have her back.
:rose: [/*]

Absolutely, and the sooner the better!
N

Mamie

07-02-2008, 11:04 PM

Originally posted by Anakerie

The ear tugging thing makes me wonder... How many other women has Drew been talking to on the internet and how many of those other women thought those ear tugs were for them? [/*]

It's too bad he can't even be original on that little sign for his women or woman-----Carol Burnett used to do it on her show to say goodnight to her kids, Lyle Waggoner used to do (I guess---I just saw him do it on a rerun of the Golden Girls recently) and there are probably countless others who do it, some I've forgotten. But geez, where's his originality?:shrug:

kimmy56

07-03-2008, 12:12 AM

Originally posted by aubrey04

Interesting site. He has a real strong fan base, eh? He might just become one of the most despised people in America - next to OJ. (if he's not already). [/*]

Interesting that you brought up OJ as I watched a rerun of Oprah today of the Goldman's and the ghost writer who wrote with OJ the book "If I Did It". What hit me is how much alike DP is to the description of OJ, ie, arrogant, that he was the good partner as opposed to the wife who he did everything for (remember DP's tales of how he spent all that $$ getting Stacy's boobs, etc.?), and who, if this really happened, it was her fault - much like what DP said in the email to this Ashley person when he said "she coulda just left". It was very eerie listening to OJ's description and seeing DP in it. I'm sure that most abusers have the same personality descriptions.

aubrey04

07-03-2008, 01:12 AM

Originally posted by kimmy56

Interesting that you brought up OJ as I watched a rerun of Oprah today of the Goldman's and the ghost writer who wrote with OJ the book "If I Did It". What hit me is how much alike DP is to the description of OJ, ie, arrogant, that he was the good partner as opposed to the wife who he did everything for (remember DP's tales of how he spent all that $$ getting Stacy's boobs, etc.?), and who, if this really happened, it was her fault - much like what DP said in the email to this Ashley person when he said "she coulda just left". It was very eerie listening to OJ's description and seeing DP in it. I'm sure that most abusers have the same personality descriptions. [/*]

It is pure arrogance and entitlement. They're both sexist and controlling. These men think they own their wives because they have spent money on them.. and when the women want to leave them, they decide it is their right to kill them.

Yes, they are very similar. They have the same mindset. Hopefully, DP will
not get off like OJ Simpson did.

Another search will be underway this week and maybe this will be the lucky trip.

I prayed earlier that they would find her or somehow send the searchers in the right direction.