Why hasn't Drew Peterson been Arrested yet?

[iluvmua]

He's as guilty as sin, if he killed Kathleen then why would he not kill Stacy?

[Mamie]

Originally posted by grammybear
It is just my opinion, but I suspect the ISP is going through every stitch of circumstantial evidence to make sure they have not overlooked anything and I also believe they may be waiting to find her body. I also believe that if she is not found soon they will arrest him and move forward with their case against him. There has been other cases where victims have not been found and the person responsible has been found guilty and end up in prison.

jmoo [/*]

I suspect you're right in your assumption of this, and couple with all of Kathleen's happenings before, up to and including her murder, it just might be enough to put things right. I do believe that when they go to court, they want to have all their ducks lined up and that takes time for all that compilation to be in order from Kathleen's written documentation to depositions and video footage (if needed) from people involved in DP's life and all the witnesses they can get their hands on. That's my opinion anyway. And then maybe after this, they might pose a self-question-------are there more he may be responsible for? JMO

[johnielee333]

because he's a PIG ! :flamemad:

[AmyO]

I agree - his arrest should have already happened. Why all of a sudden is he willing to put up $25K as a reward for her return?? I wish Sandra would update her site. April is over and she still hasn't been found. :shrug:

[iluvmua]

Somebody out there KNOWS something, but I guess they are too afraid to talk.

[johnielee333]

Originally posted by Lyndawitha"Y



Now, why don't you tell how you really feel!...lOL

LMS:seeya: [/*]

:seeya: hey whats up ?

[bbub]

Originally posted by iluvmua
He's as guilty as sin, if he killed Kathleen then why would he not kill Stacy? [/*]

Please share the evidence linking Drew to either murder. He may be a butt-head, but I've not heard anything yet that proves beyond a reasonable doubt that he murdered anybody.

Can you tell by "looking in his eyes" or some dumb old-wifes crap like that?

If he is truly guilty of one or both crimes, he should pay, otheriwse he will remain free

[kizzzy]

Originally posted by bbub


Please share the evidence linking Drew to either murder. He may be a butt-head, but I've not heard anything yet that proves beyond a reasonable doubt that he murdered anybody.

Can you tell by "looking in his eyes" or some dumb old-wifes crap like that?

If he is truly guilty of one or both crimes, he should pay, otheriwse he will remain free [/*]


HUH???? :confused:

[unclezeek]

When is the last time someone has been covicted of murder without proving there was a death?

[pcaves]

Originally posted by Lyndawitha"Y


I think Hans Reiser was just convicted of murdering his wife..and no body ws ever found..Check out his thread here on this forum..Did I get that wrong?

LMS:seeya: [/*]

You're correct Lynda...

Guilty of first-degree murder

[unclezeek]

Originally posted by Lyndawitha"Y


I think Hans Reiser was just convicted of murdering his wife..and no body ws ever found..Check out his thread here on this forum..Did I get that wrong?

LMS:seeya: [/*]I understand no body.... But how does one get convicted of murder if you cannot prove there was a death?

[unclezeek]

Originally posted by Lyndawitha"Y


I think it's called circumstantial Evidence. The jury of his peers listened to all the evidence presented and convicted him of first degree murder of his wife.

Now, Hans Reiseris NOT the first to be convicted with such evidence..but now that I am on a laptop..not my home desktop..I am unable to locate and link to my post right now..However, maybe if you Google Murder Conviction without body..you may locate those cases.

You asked the question that I can not prove that Drew was at the scene of Kathleens murder...well, I say, according to Stacy's statement to her minister, she was witness to Drew washing clothes wee hours in morning , also stated Drew was not at home during the hours of her estimated time of death, ( she was originally his alibi) and he had all sorts of motive to get rid of her including money ..kids..alimony..etc.. So like they say in the movies..He had motive, opportunity and means to carry out this murder Course, I don't need to mention the fact he inserted himself into all this by finding her in the bathtub..and used friends to try and create a smoke screen and the LE fell for it back then..there may have been even a coverup..which with the current investigation could be exposed..So I guess we'll have to wait for the trial to get all the details, course wishful thinking on my part, huh?

LMS:seeya: [/*]So you are telling me that you could be convicted of murder even though nobody is actually dead???

And that doesn't bother you?

[unclezeek]

Originally posted by Lyndawitha"Y


First, I am not a juror, just a lowly poster listing reasons, opinions, speculate of possibles..and yes if I hear all the evidence that proves to me that there is no other reasonable conclusion..I could very well conclude that Drew was responsible....Course Kathleen IS DEAD..and they do have a body, and they do have a cause of death as blunt force trauma..so Finding him guilty is a possibilty.

As for Stacy, I too wish they can find her..but to this point I have no credible evidence that she left that house on her own accord..the only thing that some hold on to is because Drew said so...and yes, a prosecutor will have to have evidence to discount that claim..but given Stacy could have been a big witness against him in Kathleen's case..so goes T.Morphey, who is in protective custody ( what does that tell you..someone feels he's at rick too).

Anyway, believing Drew is guilty does not bother me at all, however, remember we here are discussing our points of view and rationale only..we are not signing on the dotted line on a verdict form to convict..People in general do come to conclusions without proof all the time..but in a court of law, jurors must listen to all evidence presented and make a group decision not based on our speculations and opinions.

I know you stated you believe Drew did these things, but stop at the edge of convicting him in your mind..cudos to you, but you are not a juror that must reserve judgement, but a poster who can waffle one way or the other depending on whatever information you see or here.

If some wishto believe Stacy indeed run off with some man and left her home, children and family secrety, when there is no proof she went anywhere and basing this solely on Drew's claims..That is there perrogative, and go one to call Stacy trash, a ****, floozy and so on based on what? There is far less ( if any) evidence of this actually being plausible much less true.

Hope you have a nice soft pillow to sit on for that fense of yours, as it could be a while before things get aired for all to see and hear.

LMS
:seeya: [/*]I truly believe Stacy is dead and I truly believe Drew killed her
But you did not answer my question....

Are you willing to do time for murder when nobody is actually dead?

You keep talking about a body and I am talking about a death.

[unclezeek]

Originally posted by Lyndawitha"Y


I didn't realize you were asking if I would want to go to prison for murder if no death occurred..Now Unclezeek..that's a off the wall question..First I will never have to even consider such an option..I care, nurture lefe and some cases prevented death..so how would I ever be faced with that desicion? I did not googling and found an interesting article of the legal term "Death in Absentia" I will attempt to link..but is found on wikipedia..

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Death_in_absentia&oldid=209586988

hopefully this article will explain the many ways that a death can be declared by the legal system..having a body or not.

LMS

:seeya: :seeya: [/*]Now you're starting to get it. Regardless of if they find Stacys body, they still have to prove she is dead before they can charge Drew with her murder.....Correct?

[unclezeek]

Originally posted by Lyndawitha"Y
If there is not sufficient evidence that death has taken place, it may take somewhat longer, as simple absence does not necessarily prove death. The requirements for declaring an individual legally dead may vary depending on numerous details, including:

the jurisdiction in which the individual lived before death;
the jurisdiction in which he or she is presumed to have died;
how the individual is thought to have died (murder, suicide, accident, etc.);
the balance of probabilities making it more likely than not that the individual is dead.
Most countries have a set period of time (seven years in many common law jurisdictions) after which an individual is presumed to be dead if there is no evidence to the contrary. However, if the missing individual is the owner of a significant estate, the court may delay ordering a death certificate to be issued if there has been no real effort to locate the missing person. If the death is thought to have taken place in international waters or in a location without a centralized and reliable police force and/or vital statistics registration system, other laws may be in effect.

The above is a quote from the article about declaring "Death in Absentia"..So yes the prosecution can prove Stacy is dead..even without a body..it does take alot of circumstanital evidence..but can be done!
LMS

hammer [/*]I' am not saying you cannot prove death without a body. I am saying you cannot prove murder without a death.

[johnielee333]

Originally posted by bbub


Please share the evidence linking Drew to either murder. He may be a butt-head, but I've not heard anything yet that proves beyond a reasonable doubt that he murdered anybody.

Can you tell by "looking in his eyes" or some dumb old-wifes crap like that?

If he is truly guilty of one or both crimes, he should pay, otheriwse he will remain free [/*]

i was there,i saw him do it !
dont forget,i am the fly on the wall ! LOL :biggrin:

[johnielee333]

Originally posted by Lyndawitha"Y


I think it's called circumstantial Evidence. The jury of his peers listened to all the evidence presented and convicted him of first degree murder of his wife.

Now, Hans Reiseris NOT the first to be convicted with such evidence..but now that I am on a laptop..not my home desktop..I am unable to locate and link to my post right now..However, maybe if you Google Murder Conviction without body..you may locate those cases.

You asked the question that I can not prove that Drew was at the scene of Kathleens murder...well, I say, according to Stacy's statement to her minister, she was witness to Drew washing clothes wee hours in morning , also stated Drew was not at home during the hours of her estimated time of death, ( she was originally his alibi) and he had all sorts of motive to get rid of her including money ..kids..alimony..etc.. So like they say in the movies..He had motive, opportunity and means to carry out this murder Course, I don't need to mention the fact he inserted himself into all this by finding her in the bathtub..and used friends to try and create a smoke screen and the LE fell for it back then..there may have been even a coverup..which with the current investigation could be exposed..So I guess we'll have to wait for the trial to get all the details, course wishful thinking on my part, huh?

LMS:seeya: [/*]

no wishful thinking on your part,only truth. they will all see.
drew is a double murderer. YES HE IS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[johnielee333]

Originally posted by unclezeek
So you are telling me that you could be convicted of murder even though nobody is actually dead???

And that doesn't bother you? [/*]

who is nobody ? stacy was a human being NOT a nobody.
she was murdered by her husband Drew, who is an
a$$ho!e,liar,cheat,control freak,nut case,weirdo,abuser,sick mother f-eee r who needs to go straight down to he!! where he belongs with the rest of them & with the devil !! :flamemad:
may the good lord above see's to it !!!!!!!!!!!! i pray to you lord, please take stacy home to her family & put Drew Peterson where he belongs !!!!!!!! please jesus, please !!!!!!!!!!!! :rose:

AMEN

[johnielee333]

Originally posted by Lyndawitha"Y


Thankyou for making me LOL..Enjoyed the big ol' Chuckle!
LMS:D :D [/*]

:biggrin: I TRY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[johnielee333]

Originally posted by Lyndawitha"Y


First, I am not a juror, just a lowly poster listing reasons, opinions, speculate of possibles..and yes if I hear all the evidence that proves to me that there is no other reasonable conclusion..I could very well conclude that Drew was responsible....Course Kathleen IS DEAD..and they do have a body, and they do have a cause of death as blunt force trauma..so Finding him guilty is a possibilty.

As for Stacy, I too wish they can find her..but to this point I have no credible evidence that she left that house on her own accord..the only thing that some hold on to is because Drew said so...and yes, a prosecutor will have to have evidence to discount that claim..but given Stacy could have been a big witness against him in Kathleen's case..so goes T.Morphey, who is in protective custody ( what does that tell you..someone feels he's at rick too).

Anyway, believing Drew is guilty does not bother me at all, however, remember we here are discussing our points of view and rationale only..we are not signing on the dotted line on a verdict form to convict..People in general do come to conclusions without proof all the time..but in a court of law, jurors must listen to all evidence presented and make a group decision not based on our speculations and opinions.

I know you stated you believe Drew did these things, but stop at the edge of convicting him in your mind..cudos to you, but you are not a juror that must reserve judgement, but a poster who can waffle one way or the other depending on whatever information you see or here.

If some wishto believe Stacy indeed run off with some man and left her home, children and family secrety, when there is no proof she went anywhere and basing this solely on Drew's claims..That is there perrogative, and go one to call Stacy trash, a ****, floozy and so on based on what? There is far less ( if any) evidence of this actually being plausible much less true.

Hope you have a nice soft pillow to sit on for that fense of yours, as it could be a while before things get aired for all to see and hear.

LMS
:seeya: [/*]

:beer:

[johnielee333]

Originally posted by unclezeek
I truly believe Stacy is dead and I truly believe Drew killed her
But you did not answer my question....

Are you willing to do time for murder when nobody is actually dead?

You keep talking about a body and I am talking about a death. [/*]

LOOK, WAKE UP, THEY'VE CONVICTED PEOPLE FOR YRS NOW WITHOUT A BODY & MOST OF THESE BODYS HAVE NEVER BEEN FOUND. IT IS MORE REASONABLE TO BELIEVE THAT IF A PERSON IS NEVER FOUND THEN THEY MUST BE DEAD. IF THEY HAVE ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO PROVE THAT YOU KILLED THEM WITHOUT HAVING THEIR BODY THEN MORE THAN LIKELY THE JURY WILL FIND YOU GUILTY OF MURDER & BELIEVE ME , THEY REALLY ARE GUILTY OF MURDERING THE PERSON.

[johnielee333]

Originally posted by Lyndawitha"Y


Me thinks you are running in circles and NOT seeing the forest of information out there..The definition of death in a medical terms means, Brain Death..however that body can be kept viable by mechanical means for reasons of transplant or deferral for family to get to bedside..But you just said if they find Stacy's body, how can they prove she died..or is dead ? Read you statement out loud and you should realize that is a rediculous question.

Now if Stacy is found alive, which in my opinion is not likely, then dah..no there was no death..but if her body is found then physiologically she is representative of a death.

Enough, unclezeek..you are now being truly off the wall..and incoherent to me anyway..Guess, I'll just have to resort to shaking my head instead of attempting to respond with my particular rationale..It will neverbe rational to you it seems..so no more wasting my time.

:read: [/*]

:beer: You are right Lyndawitha"y. some people(unclezeek) & others do not get it. they twist it anyway than can to try their hardest justify the way they think. sometimes, i wonder about people. i just dont get it(them). :shrug:

[johnielee333]

Originally posted by Lyndawitha"Y
If there is not sufficient evidence that death has taken place, it may take somewhat longer, as simple absence does not necessarily prove death. The requirements for declaring an individual legally dead may vary depending on numerous details, including:

the jurisdiction in which the individual lived before death;
the jurisdiction in which he or she is presumed to have died;
how the individual is thought to have died (murder, suicide, accident, etc.);
the balance of probabilities making it more likely than not that the individual is dead.
Most countries have a set period of time (seven years in many common law jurisdictions) after which an individual is presumed to be dead if there is no evidence to the contrary. However, if the missing individual is the owner of a significant estate, the court may delay ordering a death certificate to be issued if there has been no real effort to locate the missing person. If the death is thought to have taken place in international waters or in a location without a centralized and reliable police force and/or vital statistics registration system, other laws may be in effect.

The above is a quote from the article about declaring "Death in Absentia"..So yes the prosecution can prove Stacy is dead..even without a body..it does take alot of circumstanital evidence..but can be done!
LMS

hammer [/*]

AND IT WILL BE DONE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[RayStar]

Thank you Lynda for your informative post. The query you endured is probably from the state of IL.
I hope before long DP will be behind bars. That smirk just makes one want to puke. Lisa S. is still missing also. I know there is a thread here for her. Just thought I would mention her also because using common sense would certainly make both of these cases soundly unreasonable. Neither just walked away.
I want LE to have a concrete case to leave no doubt that DP is guilty in both cases. Hopefully, a jury will convict DP real soon.

[pcaves]

hi all....

i don't know if this will make a difference to unclezeek, but i guess i'll post my thought anyway ....

there's a difference between "proving" a death has occurred and "declaring" a death has occurred ...

i think once someone has been "declared" dead, under suspicious circumstances, then a suspect can be tried for a murder.

(imo..)

:rose: for stacy

[johnielee333]

Originally posted by pcaves
hi all....

i don't know if this will make a difference to unclezeek, but i guess i'll post my thought anyway ....

there's a difference between "proving" a death has occurred and "declaring" a death has occurred ...

i think once someone has been "declared" dead, under suspicious circumstances, then a suspect can be tried for a murder.

(imo..)

:rose: for stacy [/*]

:rose: for stacy

[aubrey04]

Originally posted by unclezeek
So you are telling me that you could be convicted of murder even though nobody is actually dead???

And that doesn't bother you? [/*]

I know this wasn't directed at me, but I am going to jump in. I could certainly convict someone of murder without a body, if there is enough circumstantial evidence to warrant a conviction. There are a litany of convicted murderers who never had their victims body recovered..

Just last week, Hans Reiser was convicted of the murder of his wife,..even though her body hasn't been found.

Skylar and Jennifer (Henderson) Deleon are accused of killing a couple, Thomas and Jackie Hawks, and throwing them overboard into the ocean. Their bodies have never been recovered. Jennifer has already been convicted and received 2 sentences. Skylar will be tried soon.

http://www.crimelibrary.com/news/original/1106/1501_hawks_deleon.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skylar_Deleon

Diazien Hossencofft and Linda Henning were convicted of the murder of Girly Chew Hossencofft. Her body has never been found.
http://www.courttv.com/trials/henning/background.html

If the police and prosecutors can produce enough evidence against the defendant w/o a body present, I would no qualms about finding the defendant guilty.

Hopefully, LE can find enough to charge Drew with -- at some point and he will face punishment.

[tallcoolone]

Originally posted by june1943


Vincent Doan is sitting in prison and several witnesses said they had seen the missing girl since she disappeared. [/*]Yeah, and Elvis has been sighted how many times?

[Anakerie]

I have a request. Please ignore the sarcastic and childish posts by a certain poster. And PLEASE don't quote him if you must get into his infantile arguments.

[north-eh]

Originally posted by Anakerie
I have a request. Please ignore the sarcastic and childish posts by a certain poster. And PLEASE don't quote him if you must get into his infantile arguments. [/*]

Agreed, lets "weed" not "feed" them. ;)

N

[Justice_Dawg]

Originally posted by johnielee333


LOOK, WAKE UP, THEY'VE CONVICTED PEOPLE FOR YRS NOW WITHOUT A BODY & MOST OF THESE BODYS HAVE NEVER BEEN FOUND. IT IS MORE REASONABLE TO BELIEVE THAT IF A PERSON IS NEVER FOUND THEN THEY MUST BE DEAD. IF THEY HAVE ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO PROVE THAT YOU KILLED THEM WITHOUT HAVING THEIR BODY THEN MORE THAN LIKELY THE JURY WILL FIND YOU GUILTY OF MURDER & BELIEVE ME , THEY REALLY ARE GUILTY OF MURDERING THE PERSON. [/*]

Need some help here buddy? No need to yell. BTY, How are you?? :D
--------------------------------
"No body” murder trials in the United States (http://nobodycases.blogstream.com/v1/p21.html)

AS OF: March 21, 2008- 246 (47 states, DC and Virgin Islands)(Missing: VT, NH, IDAHO) (Approximately 23 acquittals or reversals on appeal)
-----------------------------------
Looks like a pretty good success rate.

[bbub]

Originally posted by Lyndawitha"Y


It's possible they will come foreward when he gets charged with Kathleen's murder!..I can only hope anyway!

LMS:seeya: [/*]

There's no/not enough evidence to bring him to trial for this either.

If being an asshole was the only evidence needed to convict someone, the may as well fence us all in at the borders

[johnielee333]

Originally posted by unclezeek
I truly believe Stacy is dead and I truly believe Drew killed her
But you did not answer my question....

Are you willing to do time for murder when nobody is actually dead?

You keep talking about a body and I am talking about a death. [/*]

no i would not be willing to do time for murder when nobody is actually dead? drew basically said awhile back that he was pretty much ready to go to jail. was he admitting that he killed stacy without actually coming straight out & saying it ? i think so because we all know that if he didnt kill stacy then he wouldnt of said that he was ready to go to jail. i wouldnt of said anything like that if i did not kill someone. he killed her & we all know it.

[johnielee333]

Originally posted by Justice_Dawg


Need some help here buddy? No need to yell. BTY, How are you?? :D
--------------------------------
"No body” murder trials in the United States (http://nobodycases.blogstream.com/v1/p21.html)

AS OF: March 21, 2008- 246 (47 states, DC and Virgin Islands)(Missing: VT, NH, IDAHO) (Approximately 23 acquittals or reversals on appeal)
-----------------------------------
Looks like a pretty good success rate. [/*]

hey justice, whats up ? :biggrin: sorry, wasnt really meaning to yell. just trying to get my point out there. i need to go to this link & read it. i do know that there has been some people missing & declared dead & later have been found but it doesnt happen very often.
glad to see youre still around ! ;)

[johnielee333]

Originally posted by Justice_Dawg


Need some help here buddy? No need to yell. BTY, How are you?? :D
--------------------------------
"No body” murder trials in the United States (http://nobodycases.blogstream.com/v1/p21.html)

AS OF: March 21, 2008- 246 (47 states, DC and Virgin Islands)(Missing: VT, NH, IDAHO) (Approximately 23 acquittals or reversals on appeal)
-----------------------------------
Looks like a pretty good success rate. [/*]

i went to the link & wow, more people have been convicted without a body than i thought. but i wonder how many of them was later found to be not guilty after all. i havent read it all yet but i will.

[Barbara fl.]

I know that many people have been wrongly accused of a crime BUT I really never heard of anyone that has been convicted of murder and then the victim reappears years later.

I believe when there is NO body the evidence has too be pretty much unquestionable to convict. Or maybe a confession.

I could be wrong BUT I really never heard of anything like that happening.

:shrug:

[not.another]

Originally posted by grammybear
There is also the case of Sam Parker whose wife Teresa has never been found. But he has been arrested and will go to trial. He kept saying he knew where she was but he was not going to say where she went. As far as I am concerned Drew saying she ran away with another man. Yes they probably know where the wives are because they put them there.

jmoo [/*]

grammybear - there has been a body found near where Theresa Parker went missing (just in the last couple days). Some believe it is her but no announcement has been made as of yet. If it is her, it will be an interesting case to follow. Her husband is a cop as well. Sorry, I don't have a link. I saw it a couple days ago and now it has disappeared.

[MichelleP]

I don't think they have enough evidence in either case to convict him yet. That's why I think Drew hasn't been arrested yet.

I was a bit surprised to see the warning by Coldwater today for this forum.

[magpie1]

I know of one "no body" case that happened in November 2002. A friend's sister went missing in South Carolina, after telling her husband that she was going to Walmart to do some shopping. She never returned home. The family made a missing person report that evening.

Two days later, Walmart reviewed their surveillance tapes and caught on tape was the woman driving into the Walmart parking lot, and before her car came to a complete stop, two men had rushed the car and got in. She had been carjacked.

The two suspects went to West Virginia and abducted a young college girl, and then on to Kentucky where the two suspects split up, one remaining in Kentucky. He was captured first. The second suspect was captured in Indiana, still driving the woman's car.

The bodies of the woman and the college girl were never found, but the two suspects stood trial in a federal court, were convicted, and both received the death penalty.

[kimmy56]

Originally posted by MichelleP
I don't think they have enough evidence in either case to convict him yet. That's why I think Drew hasn't been arrested yet.

I was a bit surprised to see the warning by Coldwater today for this forum. [/*]

what warning? the only one I saw was about not calling DP any stupid names. That was on the sixth. Is there another one?

[not.another]

Originally posted by kimmy56


what warning? the only one I saw was about not calling DP any stupid names. That was on the sixth. Is there another one? [/*]
No, that's the last warning that was posted by Coldwater.

[bearwds]

Saw the headline today, "Drew Peterson Arrested", and my mouth dropped open. Thought they had found his wife.

Turns out it was just a weapons violation which was discovered shortly after her death.

I don't do URL's so maybe someone could bring the news Item forward.


bearwds

[no1what]

Originally posted by johnielee333


no i would not be willing to do time for murder when nobody is actually dead? drew basically said awhile back that he was pretty much ready to go to jail. was he admitting that he killed stacy without actually coming straight out & saying it ? i think so because we all know that if he didnt kill stacy then he wouldnt of said that he was ready to go to jail. i wouldnt of said anything like that if i did not kill someone. he killed her & we all know it. [/*]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
IMO it is hard for me to believe that anyone from Stacy's family would spend this much time debating a Drew (rights) issue. Guilty or not I would think they would leave that to JB since he loves doing it and also gets paid for it.

[no1what]

IMO I think the number one reason that no one has been arrested in conviction of Stacy's death is because the Grand Jury has not concluded it's investigation per Illinois law.

[unclezeek]

Originally posted by no1what


-----------------------------------------------------------------------
IMO it is hard for me to believe that anyone from Stacy's family would spend this much time debating a Drew (rights) issue. Guilty or not I would think they would leave that to JB since he loves doing it and also gets paid for it. [/*]Drews rights are mine and yours as well and I would spend just as much time defending yours.

[magpie1]

I think Drew Peterson will be arrested soon. According to the article below, Illinois State Police removed the bathtub from the home where Kathleen Savio was murdered.

"The state police removed the bathtub from the home where Kathleen Savio was found dead," police spokesman Charles Pelkie told the newspaper. "It's our belief that the tub will be a key piece of evidence in the prosecution of this case when charges are filed."[/*]

Note that it states "when charges are filed", not if.

http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/Top_News/2008/05/31/bathtub_seized_in_peterson_investigation/8235/

[kimmy56]

Originally posted by magpie1
I think Drew Peterson will be arrested soon. According to the article below, Illinois State Police removed the bathtub from the home where Kathleen Savio was murdered.

"The state police removed the bathtub from the home where Kathleen Savio was found dead," police spokesman Charles Pelkie told the newspaper. "It's our belief that the tub will be a key piece of evidence in the prosecution of this case when charges are filed."[/*]

Note that it states "when charges are filed", not if.

http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/Top_News/2008/05/31/bathtub_seized_in_peterson_investigation/8235/ [/*]

This is very encouraging news!:beer: