Drew Peterson's Wives 3/20 to 4/25

[no1what]

Originally posted by Jpanda
I saw Drew on Greta last night too. I'm glad he keeps talking to the media. It keeps Stacy's name out in the public, reminds everyone what scum he is IMO, and the more he talks, the more he will slip up.

I can't wait for them to use his words against him in court.

All JMO [/*]

----------------------------------------------------------------

Well there is also that old saying: "loose lips sink ships" or something like that.

[Devotion]

Originally posted by lili


IMO, he didn't "wise up", but he certainly has turned down his clownish behavior. He's no longer laughing it up or throwing it in the media's faces. He walks with his head down and doesn't make like a clown when the cameras are on him - quite the contrary.

He went to the media in a different guise.... it's just that it was WAY to short of a guise to make any of his claims any more credible than they were before.

He clowned it up at first and he thought it was somehow "clever" and "funny".

Now, with one wife's death ruled as a homicide and the next wife "missing", it seems that the irony is catching up with him and that he doesn't find it so funny anymore.
Because it's getting much to close :big-grin:

I think he knows it, too. His facial expression was incredible to watch.
He could hardly keep his eyes on the camera at all, whereas before he couldn't get enough of it as he pushed his face and portable cam in the faces of the media crew when Stacy went "missing".

He's gone from cocky to cowering. Gee, I wonder why?...

JMO [/*]

It's my guess his PR firm is coaching him...

There's a word that keeps coming to my mind :

Chameleon...defination: a lizard that can change the color of their skin when the situation is needed....
a changeable and fickle person.:....jmo

[lonetraveler]

Does anyone know if Drew has been able to spend any of KS estate funds? Is there anything left for the boys? I wonder if any of the money he had transferred to his son was part of this estate??

[Anakerie]

Originally posted by lonetraveler
Does anyone know if Drew has been able to spend any of KS estate funds? Is there anything left for the boys? I wonder if any of the money he had transferred to his son was part of this estate?? [/*]

Thats a very good question... Something I wondered about too. The Savios and their lawyers, along with the attorney who will be looking out for the boys will no doubt have an audit done on the estate/trust fund.

On another topic, remember that 12th gun? The one that Ric Mims said Drew had strapped to his leg? I know we all wondered what happened to it, then not too long ago, it came out that the state police had "acquired it". Well, I was just watching a video that was linked over on the Find Stacy board... The news reporter says it came out in court that Drew either gave or sold the gun to someone and that person turned it over to LE after Drew's firearms card was pulled. So, Drew saying that Ric Mims lied about that gun back then was a LIE.

Here's the video:
http://www.myfoxchicago.com/myfox/pages/Home/Detail?contentId=6336436&version=1&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=VSTY&pageId=1.1.1

[lili]

Originally posted by Devotion


It's my guess his PR firm is coaching him...

There's a word that keeps coming to my mind :

Chameleon...defination: a lizard that can change the color of their skin when the situation is needed....
a changeable and fickle person.:....jmo [/*]

ITA! His current behaviour is so different. I've no doubt it's staged, but I think it's so much too little and so much too late and MUCH too obvious, IMO.

JMO

[lili]

Originally posted by Anakerie


Thats a very good question... Something I wondered about too. The Savios and their lawyers, along with the attorney who will be looking out for the boys will no doubt have an audit done on the estate/trust fund.

On another topic, remember that 12th gun? The one that Ric Mims said Drew had strapped to his leg? I know we all wondered what happened to it, then not too long ago, it came out that the state police had "acquired it". Well, I was just watching a video that was linked over on the Find Stacy board... The news reporter says it came out in court that Drew either gave or sold the gun to someone and that person turned it over to LE after Drew's firearms card was pulled. So, Drew saying that Ric Mims lied about that gun back then was a LIE.

Here's the video:
http://www.myfoxchicago.com/myfox/pages/Home/Detail?contentId=6336436&version=1&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=VSTY&pageId=1.1.1 [/*]

DrewP LIE??? Why am I not surprised?

JMO

[Top Cat 2]

Originally posted by lili


DrewP LIE??? Why am I not surprised?

JMO [/*]Dah!! I dunno! ...............
.just skepticle I guess!!:lol: moo

[Couviemom]

Originally posted by Anakerie


Thats a very good question... Something I wondered about too. The Savios and their lawyers, along with the attorney who will be looking out for the boys will no doubt have an audit done on the estate/trust fund.

On another topic, remember that 12th gun? The one that Ric Mims said Drew had strapped to his leg? I know we all wondered what happened to it, then not too long ago, it came out that the state police had "acquired it". Well, I was just watching a video that was linked over on the Find Stacy board... The news reporter says it came out in court that Drew either gave or sold the gun to someone and that person turned it over to LE after Drew's firearms card was pulled. So, Drew saying that Ric Mims lied about that gun back then was a LIE.Here's the video:
http://www.myfoxchicago.com/myfox/pages/Home/Detail?contentId=6336436&version=1&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=VSTY&pageId=1.1.1 [/*]

[Couviemom]

Anakarie maybe just maybe Ric did not lie about the gun and Drew had someone take it and say that??? You never know with Drewpy JMO just putting my thoughts down.

[Couviemom]

Originally posted by Couviemom
Anakarie maybe just maybe Ric did not lie about the gun and Drew had someone take it and say that??? You never know with Drewpy JMO just putting my thoughts down. [/*]
Okay I misread he he So it meant Drew lied not Ric. I need to sleep and refresh my brain cells. :o

[legalease]

Originally posted by Couviemom

Okay I misread he he So it meant Drew lied not Ric. I need to sleep and refresh my brain cells. :o [/*]

Sweet Dreams Couviemom < for whenever you get the time to actually rest >

I always laugh at your acronym of 'Drewpy" because it gives me a visual of his hounddog face with those baggy eyes - how on earth he kept marrying and divorcing attractive and younger women is beyond the scope of my brain!!!!!

:confused:

[Zaun]

Originally posted by Kathy*Rae
:seeya:

Money, money, money honey!

A uniform....you know how some women love a man in one...

Power...

Thats how he gets 'em....but he can't keep 'em.. [/*]

He can't keep them because one slipped in a tub and the other likely got herself killed by getting in a relation with another guy.... who turned out to be a pyscho. jmo

[lili]

Originally posted by Zaun


He can't keep them because one slipped in a tub and the other likely got herself killed by getting in a relation with another guy.... who turned out to be a pyscho. jmo [/*]

Very careless of him.

What about the other two? :biggrin:

JMO

[Mamie]

Originally posted by lili


Very careless of him.

What about the other two? :biggrin:

JMO [/*]


Great response lili, I mean it! Perfect!:beer:

[lili]

Originally posted by Mamie



Great response lili, I mean it! Perfect!:beer: [/*]

Cheers, Mamie - thank you!

JMO :seeya:

[Anakerie]

Hearsay bill moves forward
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-drew-peterson-bill-21-apr21,0,6666536.story

Proposed legislation that could affect evidence allowed in a possible prosecution of Drew Peterson now moves to the Illinois House after passing the Senate with no opposition last week.

Brodsky made an interesting statement in this article...
"You can't say, 'I can't get Drew Peterson under the law, so I'm going to change the law,' " he said. "You can't change the rules of the game after a pitch has been made, so to speak."

What's with the "pitch", Brodsky? Drew hasn't been charged yet, has he? I guess Brodsky thinks that being called a suspect is enough to just freeze time and stuff. In my opinion, since Drew hasn't been charged with anything YET, the lawmakers can do what they deem necessary. Once he's charged, then they have to try him with the laws that time, right?

Ugh.. I just read that over.. It doesn't make much sense to me.. lol..

[spiritwolf46]

Don't know if any of this is true of not, but here it is. HOPEFULLY no one has alrready posted this and I overlooked it. I really did look to see if had already been posted.

http://petersonstory.wordpress.com/2008/04/18/the-search-for-stacy-week-in-review-17/#comment-607

If what these posters are saying is true, it is so hard to keep calm!!!!! What an SOB! :flamemad:

[AmndaRcknwth]

Why wouldn't you be calm reading this?

I'm sure the neighbor with binoculars will follow
him around and report pronto.

Besides... is he locked up? Is he indicted?
Does he have the rights our country gives him?

[Miss Behavin]

Hmmm... something in that sounds a little fishy to me. I don't know... didn't want to spend an hour reading the whole thing, but from what I did read it sounds to me like this guy named "John" might have a personal investment in this woman named "Denise". JMO

John sounds like he knows this Denise and is a little jealous; he's pretty much giving all her personal info online. Scary!

Guess we'll have to wait and see what comes of it.

[spiritwolf46]

Originally posted by AmndaRcknwth
Why wouldn't you be calm reading this?

I'm sure the neighbor with binoculars will follow
him around and report pronto.

Besides... is he locked up? Is he indicted?
Does he have the rights our country gives him? [/*]

Has nothing to do with the "rights" our country has given him. Just a moral thing here with his wife missing, is all. That is why I am not calm reading this.

If it were my husband missing, I know that I would not be dating, but would have my arse out there EVERYDAY looking for him.

Nuf said.

[spiritwolf46]

Originally posted by Miss Behavin
Hmmm... something in that sounds a little fishy to me. I don't know... didn't want to spend an hour reading the whole thing, but from what I did read it sounds to me like this guy named "John" might have a personal investment in this woman named "Denise". JMO

John sounds like he knows this Denise and is a little jealous; he's pretty much giving all her personal info online. Scary!

Guess we'll have to wait and see what comes of it. [/*]

It does and it doesn't sound fishy. All the info. in a way sure does make ya wonder, but given DP's antics on air and so on, it would not surprise me.

Who knows? You are right. We will have to see what comes of it.

[Zaun]

Originally posted by AnnieBean
He can't keep em because he keeps killing them. God help the next woman who crosses paths with him. imo [/*]

That's all media hype. imo

[lili]

Originally posted by Zaun


That's all media hype. imo [/*]

Is it? 3 wives lost to divorce, one of them a victim of homicide, then the fourth goes "missing". Those are facts, not "media hype". :rolleyes:

JMO

[lili]

Originally posted by AmndaRcknwth
Why wouldn't you be calm reading this?

I'm sure the neighbor with binoculars will follow
him around and report pronto.

Besides... is he locked up? Is he indicted?
Does he have the rights our country gives him? [/*]

Certainly. So did Kathleen and Stacy.

JMO

[Zaun]

Originally posted by lili


Is it? 3 wives lost to divorce, one of them a victim of homicide, then the fourth goes "missing". Those are facts, not "media hype". :rolleyes:

JMO [/*]

Never once was he brought to trial for murder let alone convicted.

[lili]

Originally posted by Zaun


Never once was he brought to trial for murder let alone convicted. [/*]

Give it time. Investigations take a while. ;)

JMO

[Zaun]

Originally posted by lili


Give it time. Investigations take a while. ;)

JMO [/*]

They will never have evidence but what I think they are going for is a tainted jury pool that will convict anyway because they sure don't have an actual case. IMO

[GentleBreeze]

Originally posted by spiritwolf46


Has nothing to do with the "rights" our country has given him. Just a moral thing here with his wife missing, is all. That is why I am not calm reading this.

If it were my husband missing, I know that I would not be dating, but would have my arse out there EVERYDAY looking for him.

Nuf said. [/*]

I would think most of us would if we truly loved and cherished the person but I have always felt Drew and Stacey were no longer a husband and wife that loved each other. This marriage was heading straight into the crapper. Being the mother of his children means absolutely nothing to him. He thinks he can raise his own kids without her help.

Whether Drew Peterson murdered her or didn't......I don't think he gives one tinker's dam about Stacey one way or the other. Even if she was alive to him she is history. To him it is time to move on.... in fact Drew probably thinks a lot of wasted time has passed.

You just cant put feelings into someone when they have no feelings for the other person who is no longer there. He is what he is and he has lost no love when it comes to Stacey imo. He is on the prowl again and he will find them just like he has always done. I will never understand why that happens but it seems some women are very willing to step up and date the bad guys of our society.

imo

[Anakerie]

Sgt. Drew Peterson files an appeal!!
http://gretawire.foxnews.com/2008/04/22/sgt-drew-peterson-files-an-appeal/


The text of the appeal is included in Greta's post.

[lili]

Originally posted by Zaun


They will never have evidence .................[snipped]

IMO [/*]

And you know that because...

JMO

[lili]

Originally posted by Anakerie
Sgt. Drew Peterson files an appeal!!
http://gretawire.foxnews.com/2008/04/22/sgt-drew-peterson-files-an-appeal/


The text of the appeal is included in Greta's post. [/*]

That's interesting, thanks Anakeire. HOw exactly does that affect any possible case against DrewP, IF such is made?

TIA

JMO

[not.another]

Some of you have probably already seen this. But, here it is anyway.

http://drx.typepad.com/psychotherapyblog/2007/11/separated-at-bi.html

:lol:

[lili]

A man who "loses" his fourth wife to a supposed "BF" doesn't go carrying around as though it were the 4th of July, Christmas and his birthday all together.

His lawyer said that there was no need for him to show grief [sic], because his wife just left him for a new "BF", not "disappeared".

Well, I don't know about anyone else, but if my DH left me for another woman, I WOULD be grieving, and I WOULDN'T go sticking my camera into news crew's faces and playing the clown. I'd be very sad and hiding in my house for privacy, a place to try to heal.

Guess DrewP is a lot different from me, and I thank God for that.

JMO

[Anakerie]

Originally posted by lili


That's interesting, thanks Anakeire. HOw exactly does that affect any possible case against DrewP, IF such is made?

TIA

JMO [/*]

I don't think it will affect much of anything concerning the prosecution of him making Stacy disappear. Nor do I think it will do much where Kathleen's case is concerned unless they find discrepancies in how Kathleen's estate was handled. I suppose it could go to motive? Follow the money?

I really don't know how this appeal would do anything other than delay the Savio's taking over the estate. I suppose we would need a legal expert to tell us.. Or at least to tell me.. lol

ETA: That appeal is worded strangely to me. But then I've never really read an appeal for something like this before. Anyone else think it's odd?

[lili]

Originally posted by Anakerie


I don't think it will affect much of anything concerning the prosecution of him making Stacy disappear. Nor do I think it will do much where Kathleen's case is concerned unless they find discrepancies in how Kathleen's estate was handled. I suppose it could go to motive? Follow the money?

I really don't know how this appeal would do anything. I suppose we would need a legal expert to tell us.. Or at least to tell me.. lol [/*]

Yeah - me too. Hope the legal eagles chime in.

I didn't get the impression that there was much money in the estate, though... Maybe it's a case of a little being better than none, or a case of mishandling?

None of that changes the second coroner's ruling of homicide, though... IMO.

JMO

[Anakerie]

Originally posted by lili


Yeah - me too. Hope the legal eagles chime in.

I didn't get the impression that there was much money in the estate, though... Maybe it's a case of a little being better than none, or a case of mishandling?

None of that changes the second coroner's ruling of homicide, though... IMO.

JMO [/*]

I remember reading that part of Kathleen's estate was a $1 million insurance policy with the children as beneficiaries. Then there was also a business sold? At the moment, I've got a massive headache and it's kind of hard to remember what all was in the estate.. I seem to remember it was a fairly good amount of money, though.

Did you read the appeal on Greta's site? Is it just me or is it worded oddly?

[Mamie]

Originally posted by Zaun


Never once was he brought to trial for murder let alone convicted. [/*]


Yet. Add the word, "yet" to the end of that sentence. JMO

[lili]

Originally posted by Anakerie


I remember reading that part of Kathleen's estate was a $1 million insurance policy with the children as beneficiaries. Then there was also a business sold? At the moment, I've got a massive headache and it's kind of hard to remember what all was in the estate.. I seem to remember it was a fairly good amount of money, though.

Did you read the appeal on Greta's site? Is it just me or is it worded oddly? [/*]

Well, if it's just you, then add me to it. I thought it was worded oddly - I'm not even quite sure what it means. I get the gist, but it's very confusing. :shrug:

I didn't realise Kathleen's estate was worth that much. At least, the children get it all.

JMO :seeya:

[AmyO]

This idiot just doesn't stop, does he? Drive me nuts. I wish Stacy would be found so DP's life as he knows it would come to a screeching halt. Brodsy is just spinning his wheels with that dumb appeal. It won't go anywhere. Everyone has Drew's number. imo

[Jinxie]

Originally posted by lili
A man who "loses" his fourth wife to a supposed "BF" doesn't go carrying around as though it were the 4th of July, Christmas and his birthday all together.

His lawyer said that there was no need for him to show grief [sic], because his wife just left him for a new "BF", not "disappeared".

Well, I don't know about anyone else, but if my DH left me for another woman, I WOULD be grieving, and I WOULDN'T go sticking my camera into news crew's faces and playing the clown. I'd be very sad and hiding in my house for privacy, a place to try to heal.

Guess DrewP is a lot different from me, and I thank God for that.

JMO [/*]

Excellently said and right on the money. I agree with you 100%. Regardless of whether a spouse supposedly took off with someone else or not you would think there would be grief and or sadness for the person and marriage. One would also think that regardless there would also be quite an amount of concern given the fact that Stacy was an absolutely loving and dedicated mommy. To utterly and completely abandon her own children I think not.

I believe that he is using the disappearance of her own mother to make it look as though Stacy has pulled that off as well. What an absolute narcissitic sociopath.

JMOO based on the solid facts of this case so far.

[lili]

Originally posted by AmyO
This idiot just doesn't stop, does he? Drive me nuts. I wish Stacy would be found so DP's life as he knows it would come to a screeching halt. Brodsy is just spinning his wheels with that dumb appeal. It won't go anywhere. Everyone has Drew's number. imo [/*]

Now he's got legal advice behind him, he'll just keep going, IMO. Not that I think it's any good, but he'll keep going for a while. Not for long, IMO.

As to spinning wheels - I had a personal experience with it this past week-end on a new gravel-way. Not nice. Ouch. Not my fault entirley, either. Ouch.

Just thought I'd load off, if you'all don't mind.

Cheers!

JMO

[bbub]

"A man who "loses" his fourth wife to a supposed "BF" doesn't go carrying around as though it were the 4th of July, Christmas and his birthday all together."

If
my wife left me for another guy, that's exactly what I'd be doing. I ain't gonna sit around and feel sorry for myself.

If Drew is truly responsible for her disappearance, what makes you think he would care enough to NOT act out in this manner?

[Anakerie]

I didn't watch Dan Abrams last night, but perhaps some of you folks did. I was reading on another forum where they are discussing who will be on tonight's "Verdict" show. Apparently there was a little mention of a guest who will be on tonight's show... Yup, Drew Peterson.

No mention of it on the MSNBC site, so I don't know if Drew will be on the show tonight. But, I'm sure if he is going to be on, he'll have his "faithful" lawyer with him...

:rolleyes:

[Nova]

Originally posted by flere


Yes, Anarkerie~ I saw on MSNBC-TV short while ago promo that "Verdict with Dan Abrams" will have 'live interview' with DP tonight. No mention of his side-kick lawyer -- maybe that's so we'll watch and see them :punch: each other again. [/*]
Good Evening All :seeya:
Haven't been around for awhile and wanted to check in, see if there was any new info.
I caught the promo for Dan Abrams show tonight ... looks like DP is making the "media rounds" :rolleyes: I sure would like to see Dan hit him with some tough questions, I think on LKing it was too much of a "cake walk" for DP and JB, same old BS.
Check with ya'll tonight during the show!!!

[Anakerie]

Since my internet service is rather sporadic today, I will be in the other room watching TV. And, of course, I'll see what kind of questions Dan Abrams has for Drew. Dan can be "tough" with his guests, but I have to wonder if he will be with Drew. Drew has walked off from an interview before, do you think he'll walk again tonight if Dan asks a question that Drew doesn't like?

I'm sure that Brodsky will be there as well. They seem to be joined at the hip when it comes to these high profile TV interviews. Brodsky is probably loving the exposure and most likely is positive that he's making a wonderful impression on all of us.. LOL

[north-eh]

Well I just saw the interview, and I can say in all honesty there was nothing new here. Just the same old BS from both of them, and DP spuing more slurs against Stacy saying in the last phone call she made to him she sounded snippy and cut their conversation short. I thought Dan made a few good points tho, but really I think DP and ole Brodsky enjoyed it as usual.barf

N

[Anakerie]

I'll have to wait until MSNBC puts transcripts or video up before I watch it.. lol, I got an invitation to go watch my granddaughter and her school chorus perform. I felt that would be something worth watching! And it was! The kids did a fantastic job...
:D

[Mamie]

Originally posted by Anakerie
I'll have to wait until MSNBC puts transcripts or video up before I watch it.. lol, I got an invitation to go watch my granddaughter and her school chorus perform. I felt that would be something worth watching! And it was! The kids did a fantastic job...
:D [/*]

Bless your heart------that's better any day of the week,------watching the grandkids at whatever they're doing!

I must have missed it too. So will have to catch it online or something.

[north-eh]

Originally posted by Anakerie
I'll have to wait until MSNBC puts transcripts or video up before I watch it.. lol, I got an invitation to go watch my granddaughter and her school chorus perform. I felt that would be something worth watching! And it was! The kids did a fantastic job...
:D [/*]

Glad to hear it Anakerie....grandchildren are sooo worth it! Dan put out some good questions, but they both sat there like the idots they are IMO, and said the same ole thing, boooring!!!!

N:seeya:

[bbub]

and how, pray tell, does the fact that Drew is "carrying on" negatively affect his and Stacy's children?

[Rainkiss]

Originally posted by bbub
and how, pray tell, does the fact that Drew is "carrying on" negatively affect his and Stacy's children? [/*]

Well, there's "how much did Dad really care about Mom if he can joke around about her being gone?" "How much did Dad love Mom if he's moving on to someone else so soon?"

And, of course,

"If he didn't love Mom, does he love US?"

[tagalong]

Originally posted by Rainkiss


Well, there's "how much did Dad really care about Mom if he can joke around about her being gone?" "How much did Dad love Mom if he's moving on to someone else so soon?"

And, of course,

"If he didn't love Mom, does he love US?" [/*]

I'm sorry to say, but without some kind of intervention the children will grow up to be just like "dear old dad". Let's make the intervention be our prayers for the children.

[not.another]

Did Mr. Abrams think he would get different answers this time? I mean, come on....he asked Drew the same questions he has been asked numerous times before! Mr. Abrams...a day late and a dollar short. Drew mentioned Stacy being "snotty" when she called him that night. Wow, way to go DrewP. Slam her some more.

IMO, the only reason DrewP won't answer the timeline question is because he doesn't want to say something even a little bit different than what he told LE already. I can understand that. However, if he's telling the truth about this whole thing...why would his timeline be any different?

Personally, I'm sick of the interviews. It is just the same thing, same questions over and over again. Yuck.

[tagalong]

[QUOTE]Originally posted by not.another
[ Drew mentioned Stacy being "snotty" when she called him that night. Wow, way to go DrewP. Slam her some more.


I think Stacy may have been "snotty" the morning of 10/28/07, around 10:30, after her phone call from Bruce, right before DP killed her (IMO, JMO)[/*] . DP is trying to stick to the truth as close as he can without actually giving himself away.

[spiritwolf46]

Originally posted by bbub
"A man who "loses" his fourth wife to a supposed "BF" doesn't go carrying around as though it were the 4th of July, Christmas and his birthday all together."

If
my wife left me for another guy, that's exactly what I'd be doing. I ain't gonna sit around and feel sorry for myself.

If Drew is truly responsible for her disappearance, what makes you think he would care enough to NOT act out in this manner? [/*]

Very simply.......to prove to people that he did not do the crime and he is a bigger man and is looking for her. Not only to find her, but to CLEAR HIS NAME! Now, he has done none of this, has he??

[spiritwolf46]

Originally posted by Anakerie
I'll have to wait until MSNBC puts transcripts or video up before I watch it.. lol, I got an invitation to go watch my granddaughter and her school chorus perform. I felt that would be something worth watching! And it was! The kids did a fantastic job...
:D [/*]

There is nothing that would keep me away from something my granddaughter was in either, Anakerie! Good for you and I will bet it was SUPERB!

By the waym Drew and Brodsky was up to the same old same old. Did not miss much anyway. :)

[spiritwolf46]

Originally posted by spiritwolf46


There is nothing that would keep me away from something my granddaughter was in either, Anakerie! Good for you and I will bet it was SUPERB!

By the way Drew and Brodsky was up to the same old same old. Did not miss much anyway. :) [/*]

[Anakerie]

Originally posted by spiritwolf46


There is nothing that would keep me away from something my granddaughter was in either, Anakerie! Good for you and I will bet it was SUPERB!

By the waym Drew and Brodsky was up to the same old same old. Did not miss much anyway. :) [/*]

I saw the video of Drew and Brodsky on Dan Abrams page... Nothing new, same old stuff... Except for Brodsky trying to explain away calling everyone liars... That was a giggle... His explanations sure didn't work...

BTW, yes, the program my granddaughter was in was definitely superb... We've got DVD's of the performance ordered from the college film crew that were filming last night too! hehe

[spiritwolf46]

Originally posted by Anakerie


I saw the video of Drew and Brodsky on Dan Abrams page... Nothing new, same old stuff... Except for Brodsky trying to explain away calling everyone liars... That was a giggle... His explanations sure didn't work...

BTW, yes, the program my granddaughter was in was definitely superb... We've got DVD's of the performance ordered from the college film crew that were filming last night too! hehe [/*]


SWEEEEEEEET!!!!!!! :)

[bbub]

Originally posted by spiritwolf46


Very simply.......to prove to people that he did not do the crime and he is a bigger man and is looking for her. Not only to find her, but to CLEAR HIS NAME! Now, he has done none of this, has he?? [/*]

why would he look for her if he doesn't think she's dead?

My mom left my dad when I was six, he looked all over hell's half-acre for her, never did find her, even though her family knew where she was, proved to be nothing more than one big heartache and huge waste of time.

[spiritwolf46]

Originally posted by bbub


why would he look for her if he doesn't think she's dead?

My mom left my dad when I was six, he looked all over hell's half-acre for her, never did find her, even though her family knew where she was, proved to be nothing more than one big heartache and huge waste of time. [/*]


Again, to see if he can find her if nothing more than to completely clear himself of being a poi or suspect.



I am very sorry to hear that this happened to you and your dad. Very sad, indeed. :rose: For you all.

[Mamie]

Originally posted by bbub


why would he look for her if he doesn't think she's dead?

My mom left my dad when I was six, he looked all over hell's half-acre for her, never did find her, even though her family knew where she was, proved to be nothing more than one big heartache and huge waste of time. [/*]

I, too, am very sorry that your mother left you and your dad in the way she did. But that isn't Stacy----Stacy loved her children and loved Drew's children enough to adopt them so that they'd have a mother. By the looks of the home she made, and by Drew's own words that he had changed very little in the house since she left----Stacy made a wonderful, warm and comfortable home for her husband and family. Her family has said time and time again that Stacy would not just take off like that and not have any contact with anyone!! So in this case, she's missing and now possibly presumed dead, so why wouldn't Drew want to look for her? You can't honestly say he has the best track record with his female relationships now, can you???:shrug: JMO

[bbub]

I don't think you're getting my point. The last thing I want to do is defend Drew Peterson.

He's law enforcement, he's probably seen every trick in the book. Did any of you hear about the case where one husbadn did exactly what you advocate, actually lead LE to the body and was promptly arrested and charged with her murder.

Of course her family is going to defend her, whether she deserves their support or not. But people do strange things for strange reasons. Every character witness ever called to the court room who testifies on behalf of the litigant swears to the fact that he/she would NEVER be capable of this or that ........ I'm not making a judgement, 'cause I really don't know about any of that.

All I'm saying is that the perception that Drew seems to be perpetuating doesn't fit what some of you would like to see, but that doesn't mean that he isn't doing what is in HIS best interest ....

Again, why look for a person who ain't dead and hidden somewhere? That would be stupid to do if he's trying to make people believe that she ran off with another man. If she wants to stay hidden, she will NEVER be found

[Devotion]

Originally posted by spiritwolf46

Don't know if any of this is true of not, but here it is. HOPEFULLY no one has alrready posted this and I overlooked it. I really did look to see if had already been posted.

http://petersonstory.wordpress.com/2008/04/18/the-search-for-stacy-week-in-review-17/#comment-607

If what these posters are saying is true, it is so hard to keep calm!!!!! What an SOB!....... :flamemad: [/*]
I'm not surprised if D. has a girlfriend!
It is amazing what you can find under the ROCKS!!!jmo

[spiritwolf46]

Originally posted by Devotion

I'm not surprised if D. has a girlfriend!
It is amazing what you can find under the ROCKS!!!jmo [/*]

AMEN to THAT!

[north-eh]

Originally posted by bbub


why would he look for her if he doesn't think she's dead?

My mom left my dad when I was six, he looked all over hell's half-acre for her, never did find her, even though her family knew where she was, proved to be nothing more than one big heartache and huge waste of time. [/*]

I don't post much on these boards, but I have followed this case and read these boards every day. Now, I too am sorry your mom left you and your dad, but the difference in your situation then is the fact that your mom's family knew where she was, apparently you did not. So at least they knew she was alive and must have had contact with them. That is significant. In this case however, nothing, not a peep, so IMO Stacy did not survive to come home to talk about it.

N